27.11.2012 Views

Ethical issues in engineering design - 3TU.Centre for Ethics and ...

Ethical issues in engineering design - 3TU.Centre for Ethics and ...

Ethical issues in engineering design - 3TU.Centre for Ethics and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g ethics <strong>and</strong> <strong>design</strong> processes<br />

As the example of the bolt <strong>and</strong> the new transportation device suggests,<br />

eng<strong>in</strong>eers are confronted with different degrees of external constra<strong>in</strong>t <strong>in</strong> different<br />

<strong>design</strong> processes. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to V<strong>in</strong>centi [V<strong>in</strong>centi, 1992], this degree of external<br />

constra<strong>in</strong>t depends ma<strong>in</strong>ly on two dimensions: the level of <strong>design</strong> hierarchy <strong>and</strong><br />

the type of <strong>design</strong> (normal versus radical). 6<br />

Design hierarchy<br />

Most modern products consist of several parts, subassemblies <strong>and</strong> subsystems. 7<br />

In many cases these subsystems <strong>and</strong> parts are more or less <strong>in</strong>dependently<br />

<strong>design</strong>ed. Depend<strong>in</strong>g on how the <strong>design</strong> process is organised, different teams<br />

<strong>and</strong> eng<strong>in</strong>eers work on different parts of the product. There is communication<br />

<strong>and</strong> co-operation between the teams or at least there usually is. These <strong>design</strong><br />

teams can be from the same or from different companies. The parts,<br />

subassemblies <strong>and</strong> subsystems are ordered hierarchically. The complete product<br />

is <strong>design</strong>ed at the highest levels of the <strong>design</strong> hierarchy; subsystems <strong>and</strong> parts are<br />

<strong>design</strong>ed at lower levels. V<strong>in</strong>centi divides the <strong>design</strong> hierarchy of the <strong>design</strong><br />

process of an airplane <strong>in</strong> the follow<strong>in</strong>g levels.<br />

‘1. Project def<strong>in</strong>ition: translation of some usually ill-def<strong>in</strong>ed military or<br />

commercial requirement <strong>in</strong>to a concrete technical problem <strong>for</strong> level 2.<br />

2. Overall <strong>design</strong>: layout of arrangement <strong>and</strong> proportions of the airplane to<br />

meet the project def<strong>in</strong>ition.<br />

3. Major-component <strong>design</strong>: division of project <strong>in</strong>to w<strong>in</strong>g <strong>design</strong>, fuselage<br />

<strong>design</strong>, l<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g-gear <strong>design</strong>, electrical-system <strong>design</strong> etc.<br />

4. Subdivision of areas of component <strong>design</strong> from level 3 accord<strong>in</strong>g to<br />

eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g discipl<strong>in</strong>e required (e.g., aerodynamic w<strong>in</strong>g <strong>design</strong>, structural<br />

w<strong>in</strong>g <strong>design</strong>, mechanical w<strong>in</strong>g <strong>design</strong>).<br />

5. Further division of categories <strong>in</strong> level 4 <strong>in</strong>to highly specific problems e.g.<br />

aerodynamic w<strong>in</strong>g <strong>design</strong> <strong>in</strong>to problems of plat<strong>for</strong>m, airfoil section <strong>and</strong><br />

high-lift devices).’ [V<strong>in</strong>centi, 1990, 9].<br />

There are similarities between V<strong>in</strong>centi’s ideas of <strong>design</strong> hierarchy <strong>and</strong> the<br />

<strong>design</strong> hierarchy levels def<strong>in</strong>ed by Disco et al. [Disco et al., 1992]. Disco et al.<br />

dist<strong>in</strong>guish the follow<strong>in</strong>g levels of hierarchy:<br />

• systems, like a plant, electricity or cable networks<br />

• functional artefacts, like cars, etc<br />

• devices like pumps, motors etc<br />

• components, like materials, nuts, condensers etc<br />

——————————————————————————————————<br />

6<br />

V<strong>in</strong>centi uses the term “technical constra<strong>in</strong>ts” <strong>in</strong>stead of external constra<strong>in</strong>t, but this is a<br />

mislead<strong>in</strong>g term <strong>in</strong> my view s<strong>in</strong>ce some of the constra<strong>in</strong>ts mentioned by V<strong>in</strong>centi are not<br />

technical but rather social <strong>in</strong> nature. V<strong>in</strong>centi seems to use the term technical constra<strong>in</strong>ts <strong>for</strong> all<br />

constra<strong>in</strong>ts that the eng<strong>in</strong>eer s of a <strong>design</strong> team cannot change [V<strong>in</strong>centi, 1992].<br />

7<br />

Walton, <strong>for</strong> example, estimates that there are about 30.000 parts <strong>in</strong> the Ford Taurus [Walton,<br />

1997].<br />

33

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!