Ethical issues in engineering design - 3TU.Centre for Ethics and ...
Ethical issues in engineering design - 3TU.Centre for Ethics and ...
Ethical issues in engineering design - 3TU.Centre for Ethics and ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g ethics <strong>and</strong> <strong>design</strong> processes<br />
As the example of the bolt <strong>and</strong> the new transportation device suggests,<br />
eng<strong>in</strong>eers are confronted with different degrees of external constra<strong>in</strong>t <strong>in</strong> different<br />
<strong>design</strong> processes. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to V<strong>in</strong>centi [V<strong>in</strong>centi, 1992], this degree of external<br />
constra<strong>in</strong>t depends ma<strong>in</strong>ly on two dimensions: the level of <strong>design</strong> hierarchy <strong>and</strong><br />
the type of <strong>design</strong> (normal versus radical). 6<br />
Design hierarchy<br />
Most modern products consist of several parts, subassemblies <strong>and</strong> subsystems. 7<br />
In many cases these subsystems <strong>and</strong> parts are more or less <strong>in</strong>dependently<br />
<strong>design</strong>ed. Depend<strong>in</strong>g on how the <strong>design</strong> process is organised, different teams<br />
<strong>and</strong> eng<strong>in</strong>eers work on different parts of the product. There is communication<br />
<strong>and</strong> co-operation between the teams or at least there usually is. These <strong>design</strong><br />
teams can be from the same or from different companies. The parts,<br />
subassemblies <strong>and</strong> subsystems are ordered hierarchically. The complete product<br />
is <strong>design</strong>ed at the highest levels of the <strong>design</strong> hierarchy; subsystems <strong>and</strong> parts are<br />
<strong>design</strong>ed at lower levels. V<strong>in</strong>centi divides the <strong>design</strong> hierarchy of the <strong>design</strong><br />
process of an airplane <strong>in</strong> the follow<strong>in</strong>g levels.<br />
‘1. Project def<strong>in</strong>ition: translation of some usually ill-def<strong>in</strong>ed military or<br />
commercial requirement <strong>in</strong>to a concrete technical problem <strong>for</strong> level 2.<br />
2. Overall <strong>design</strong>: layout of arrangement <strong>and</strong> proportions of the airplane to<br />
meet the project def<strong>in</strong>ition.<br />
3. Major-component <strong>design</strong>: division of project <strong>in</strong>to w<strong>in</strong>g <strong>design</strong>, fuselage<br />
<strong>design</strong>, l<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g-gear <strong>design</strong>, electrical-system <strong>design</strong> etc.<br />
4. Subdivision of areas of component <strong>design</strong> from level 3 accord<strong>in</strong>g to<br />
eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g discipl<strong>in</strong>e required (e.g., aerodynamic w<strong>in</strong>g <strong>design</strong>, structural<br />
w<strong>in</strong>g <strong>design</strong>, mechanical w<strong>in</strong>g <strong>design</strong>).<br />
5. Further division of categories <strong>in</strong> level 4 <strong>in</strong>to highly specific problems e.g.<br />
aerodynamic w<strong>in</strong>g <strong>design</strong> <strong>in</strong>to problems of plat<strong>for</strong>m, airfoil section <strong>and</strong><br />
high-lift devices).’ [V<strong>in</strong>centi, 1990, 9].<br />
There are similarities between V<strong>in</strong>centi’s ideas of <strong>design</strong> hierarchy <strong>and</strong> the<br />
<strong>design</strong> hierarchy levels def<strong>in</strong>ed by Disco et al. [Disco et al., 1992]. Disco et al.<br />
dist<strong>in</strong>guish the follow<strong>in</strong>g levels of hierarchy:<br />
• systems, like a plant, electricity or cable networks<br />
• functional artefacts, like cars, etc<br />
• devices like pumps, motors etc<br />
• components, like materials, nuts, condensers etc<br />
——————————————————————————————————<br />
6<br />
V<strong>in</strong>centi uses the term “technical constra<strong>in</strong>ts” <strong>in</strong>stead of external constra<strong>in</strong>t, but this is a<br />
mislead<strong>in</strong>g term <strong>in</strong> my view s<strong>in</strong>ce some of the constra<strong>in</strong>ts mentioned by V<strong>in</strong>centi are not<br />
technical but rather social <strong>in</strong> nature. V<strong>in</strong>centi seems to use the term technical constra<strong>in</strong>ts <strong>for</strong> all<br />
constra<strong>in</strong>ts that the eng<strong>in</strong>eer s of a <strong>design</strong> team cannot change [V<strong>in</strong>centi, 1992].<br />
7<br />
Walton, <strong>for</strong> example, estimates that there are about 30.000 parts <strong>in</strong> the Ford Taurus [Walton,<br />
1997].<br />
33