11.07.2015 Views

Clinical Textbook of Addictive Disorders 3rd ed - R. Frances, S. Miller, A. Mack (Guilford, 2005) WW

Clinical Textbook of Addictive Disorders 3rd ed - R. Frances, S. Miller, A. Mack (Guilford, 2005) WW

Clinical Textbook of Addictive Disorders 3rd ed - R. Frances, S. Miller, A. Mack (Guilford, 2005) WW

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

200 III. SUBSTANCES OF ABUSEIQ scores (though still in the normal range) on the Stanford–Binet for childrenprenatally expos<strong>ed</strong> to cocaine in combination with other drugs; this study alsoidentifi<strong>ed</strong> m<strong>ed</strong>iating variables such as home environment, head circumference,and child behavior. In addition, a large study found that cocaine-expos<strong>ed</strong> childrenwere twice as likely to be significantly delay<strong>ed</strong> developmentally throughoutthe first 2 years <strong>of</strong> life and were twice as likely to require intervention as thenoncocaine polydrug-expos<strong>ed</strong> comparison group. These cognitive delays werenot due to exposure to other drugs or to covariates. Furthermore, poorer cognitiveoutcomes were relat<strong>ed</strong> to higher levels <strong>of</strong> prenatal cocaine exposure(Singer et al., 2002). In addition to cognitive delays, 2-year-olds who had beenprenatally expos<strong>ed</strong> to both PCP and cocaine were found to utilize less matureplay strategies and to evidence less sustain<strong>ed</strong> attention, more deviant behaviors,and poorer quality interactions with caregivers (Beckwith et al., 1994).In summary, findings on the consequences <strong>of</strong> prenatal cocaine exposurerelative to child development are inconsistent. Early concerns about severe,permanent neurobehavioral deficits appear to have been exaggerations; however,evidence remains that prenatal exposure to cocaine may contribute to th<strong>ed</strong>evelopment <strong>of</strong> more mild or subtle neurobehavioral difficulties, such as poorerlanguage functioning. In studying this population, it will be essential forresearchers to control for confounding factors such as age, race, socioeconomicstatus, and other drug use; this is especially true, because some studies havefound environmental factors to be equal even more important determinants <strong>of</strong>functioning.ASSESSMENTInitial evaluation <strong>of</strong> the cocaine abuser begins with a m<strong>ed</strong>ical, psychiatric, andpsychosocial history, as well as a physical examination. Confirming and augmentingthe patient’s history through collateral reports <strong>of</strong> family members andsignificant others is <strong>of</strong>ten helpful. On an emergency basis, the following laboratorytests ne<strong>ed</strong> to be consider<strong>ed</strong>, bas<strong>ed</strong> on the patient’s clinical presentation:complete blood count, chemical pr<strong>of</strong>ile (SMA-12), urinalysis, urine and/orblood toxicology, electrocardiogram, and chest X-ray. Indications for acute hospitalizationinclude (1) serious m<strong>ed</strong>ical or psychiatric problems either caus<strong>ed</strong> bythe stimulant drugs or independently coexisting, and (2) concurrent dependenceon other drugs, such as alcohol or s<strong>ed</strong>ative hypnotics, necessitating a moreclosely supervis<strong>ed</strong> withdrawal. A validat<strong>ed</strong>, widely accept<strong>ed</strong> tool to assess addictionseverity specifically to cocaine has not yet been develop<strong>ed</strong>. However,DSM-IV-TR (American Psychiatric Association, 2000) diagnostic criteria forcocaine intoxication, withdrawal, delirium, delusional disorder, dependence,and abuse are bas<strong>ed</strong> on the symptoms describ<strong>ed</strong> in this chapter. Evaluation to

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!