11.07.2015 Views

Clinical Textbook of Addictive Disorders 3rd ed - R. Frances, S. Miller, A. Mack (Guilford, 2005) WW

Clinical Textbook of Addictive Disorders 3rd ed - R. Frances, S. Miller, A. Mack (Guilford, 2005) WW

Clinical Textbook of Addictive Disorders 3rd ed - R. Frances, S. Miller, A. Mack (Guilford, 2005) WW

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

25. Adolescent Substance Abuse 561<strong>of</strong> users in sixth grade or earlier. These “gateway drugs” were alcohol, tobacco,and inhalants (O’Malley, Johnston, & Bachman, 1995).Gender and Ethnic GroupIn general, male students use more substances <strong>of</strong> all kinds than female students;however, the differences are consistently getting smaller (Wallace et al., 2003).O’Malley and colleagues (1995) suggest<strong>ed</strong> that “closing the gap” by adolescentfemales may have to do with slightly earlier female maturation and with theirtendency to associate with older male students. Excluding Native Americanyouth, Hispanic students score highest among all other ethnic subpopulationsat 8th grade for all illicit drug classes. At 12th grade, they are the highest forcocaine, heroin, and steroids. Hispanic males and females manifest the highestlevels <strong>of</strong> marijuana use and binge drinking similar to white youth (in excess <strong>of</strong>40% for 10th graders). Asian American students manifest the lowest rates <strong>of</strong>use.NOSOLOGYSubstance use and abuse occurs on a continuum, and the cut<strong>of</strong>f point for makinga diagnosis <strong>of</strong> abuse/dependence is somewhat arbitrary, particularly in adolescents(Rohde, Lewinsohn, & Seeley, 1996). <strong>Clinical</strong> psychiatry has traditionallyfollow<strong>ed</strong> the dichotomous paradigm <strong>of</strong> the DSM nosology regardless <strong>of</strong>its limitation providing information in terms <strong>of</strong> pathogenesis and treatmentresponse (Bukstein & Kaminer, 1994). In addition, the serious negative impact<strong>of</strong> drugs on adolescents or adults who experience subdiagnostic levels <strong>of</strong> problematicsubstance use has been recogniz<strong>ed</strong> but has not been address<strong>ed</strong> by theDSM system (Lewinsohn et al., 1996).The same DSM-IV-TR diagnostic criteria are utiliz<strong>ed</strong> for both adolescentsand adults in the diagnosis <strong>of</strong> substance abuse and dependence. Empirical datagenerally support the utility <strong>of</strong> DSM-IV-TR criteria for alcohol dependenceamong adolescents (Martin et al., 1995). Lewinsohn and colleagues (1996)report<strong>ed</strong> on the strong similarity between adolescents and adults in the frequency<strong>of</strong> 8 <strong>of</strong> the 11 symptoms in DSM-IV-TR criteria for abuse and dependence.Among adolescents with a diagnosis, the most frequently report<strong>ed</strong> symptomswere r<strong>ed</strong>uc<strong>ed</strong> activities, tolerance, consuming more than intend<strong>ed</strong>, anddesire to cut down (Lewinsohn et al., 1996; Stewart & Brown, 1995).Abuse and dependence are distinctly separate (Hasin, Grant, & Endicott,1990). A majority <strong>of</strong> adults diagnos<strong>ed</strong> as abusers never progress to dependence.Abuse is not necessarily a prodrome, and it may be developmentally limit<strong>ed</strong> inmany adolescents. “Diagnostic orphans” are those youth who have subthresholdsymptomatology <strong>of</strong> alcohol dependence (i.e., one or two symptoms only) but no

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!