11.07.2015 Views

Clinical Textbook of Addictive Disorders 3rd ed - R. Frances, S. Miller, A. Mack (Guilford, 2005) WW

Clinical Textbook of Addictive Disorders 3rd ed - R. Frances, S. Miller, A. Mack (Guilford, 2005) WW

Clinical Textbook of Addictive Disorders 3rd ed - R. Frances, S. Miller, A. Mack (Guilford, 2005) WW

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

24. Family-Bas<strong>ed</strong> Treatment 543fears about relapse, and facilitate minor structural changes in the family toallow adequate parenting (Bepko & Krestan, 1985). Changes in parenting practicesare especially vital when the recovering substance abuser is an adolescent(Alexander & Parsons, 1982; Fishman et al., 1982; Henggeler & Borduin, 1990;Landau & Garrett, 1998; Liddle & Hogue, 2001; Piercy & Frankel, 1989;Stanton & Landau-Stanton, 1990; Szapocznik & Kurtines, 1989; Todd &Selekman, 1991; Waldron et al., 2001).Whenever a relapse into drinking or drug taking occurs, the question <strong>of</strong>responsibility arises. Who is responsible for the relapse? Although conventionaldrug treatment programs and many individual therapists either thrust theresponsibility on the substance abuser or accept it themselves, family therapiststend to assign the responsibility to the abuser’s family. As Stanton and Todd(1992) suggest<strong>ed</strong>, “It should be remember<strong>ed</strong> that the addict<strong>ed</strong> individual wasrais<strong>ed</strong> by, and in most cases is still being maintain<strong>ed</strong> by, his family <strong>of</strong> origin. It isthus with the family that responsibility rests, and the therapist should help thefamily either to accept it or to effectively disengage from the addict so that theaddict must accept it on his or her own” (p. 55, original emphasis).Similarly, the therapist must assign cr<strong>ed</strong>it to the entire family when cr<strong>ed</strong>itis due (Stanton, 1981c). Each member, particularly the <strong>of</strong>ten-neglect<strong>ed</strong> spouse,is prais<strong>ed</strong> for his or her contribution to the growing “health” <strong>of</strong> the family. Byidentifying and rewarding individual contributions, family therapists spread theglory that is usually bestow<strong>ed</strong> on recovering abusers and promote long-lastingchanges in family interaction.Stage 5: Family Reorganization and RecoveryWhereas families in Stage 4 remain<strong>ed</strong> organiz<strong>ed</strong> around substance abuse andtherapy was focus<strong>ed</strong> on resolving difficulties with substance abuse, Stage 5 isconcern<strong>ed</strong> with helping families move away from interaction focus<strong>ed</strong> on substanceabuse issues and toward fundamentally better relationships. Here, thesubstance abuser is stabiliz<strong>ed</strong> and “clean and sober.” Therapy now focuses ondeveloping a better marriage, establishing more satisfactory parent–child relationships,and perhaps confronting long-standing family-<strong>of</strong>-origin and codependenceissues.Steinglass and colleagues (1987) call<strong>ed</strong> this process “family reorganization”(p. 344). Although some families restabilize before reaching this phase andremain organiz<strong>ed</strong> around alcohol issues (“dry alcoholic” families), we haveobserv<strong>ed</strong> that for others, the previous stages <strong>of</strong> therapy culminate in a seriousfamily crisis. This crisis then leads to disorganization and ultimately to a fundamentallydifferent organizational pattern that is encourag<strong>ed</strong> in this stage <strong>of</strong>therapy.Bepko and Krestan (1985) enumerat<strong>ed</strong> four goals for their analogue <strong>of</strong> thisstage, which they have term<strong>ed</strong> “rebalancing” (p. 135):

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!