11.07.2015 Views

Clinical Textbook of Addictive Disorders 3rd ed - R. Frances, S. Miller, A. Mack (Guilford, 2005) WW

Clinical Textbook of Addictive Disorders 3rd ed - R. Frances, S. Miller, A. Mack (Guilford, 2005) WW

Clinical Textbook of Addictive Disorders 3rd ed - R. Frances, S. Miller, A. Mack (Guilford, 2005) WW

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

598 V. TREATMENTS FOR ADDICTIONSKhan, Mumford, Rogers, and Beckford (1997) report<strong>ed</strong> that l<strong>of</strong>exidine, analpha 2adrenergic agonist that produces less hypotension than clonidine, can bea useful adjunctive m<strong>ed</strong>ication during methadone detoxification. L<strong>of</strong>exidinewas equal to clonidine in r<strong>ed</strong>ucing symptoms <strong>of</strong> opioid withdrawal, andside effects <strong>of</strong> hypotension and lethargy were report<strong>ed</strong> by substantially fewerpatients in the l<strong>of</strong>exidine group. Clonidine can also be us<strong>ed</strong> as an adjunctivem<strong>ed</strong>ication to assist with emerging withdrawal symptoms during detoxification,but m<strong>ed</strong>ical complications relat<strong>ed</strong> to hypotension and s<strong>ed</strong>ation can limit tolerancefor this drug. Methadone detoxification should be complet<strong>ed</strong> within 3weeks (Van den Brink, Goppel, & van Ree, 2003). Detoxification protocols aresummariz<strong>ed</strong> in Figure 26.1.Opioid detoxification can also be undertaken with buprenorphine, anopioid partial agonist (Kosten & Kleber, 1988; Lewis, 1985). In one study, heroinaddicts and methadone-maintain<strong>ed</strong> patients were convert<strong>ed</strong> to buprenorphinefor a month <strong>of</strong> stabilization at once-daily doses ranging from 2 to 8 mgsublingually. Following this period, buprenorphine was abruptly stopp<strong>ed</strong>, andthe patient was given a high dose <strong>of</strong> intravenous naloxone (35 mg) to precipitatewithdrawal from the buprenorphine (Kosten et al., 1989). This withdrawalsyndrome was relatively mild and treat<strong>ed</strong> with clonidine, if ne<strong>ed</strong><strong>ed</strong>. Followingprecipitat<strong>ed</strong> withdrawal, it was possible for the patient to be start<strong>ed</strong> onnaltrexone the same day. Additional studies in which the sublingual formulations<strong>of</strong> buprenorphine are us<strong>ed</strong> for detoxification are ongoing at this time.Buprenorphine can also be combin<strong>ed</strong> with clonidine and naltrexone for ahighly successful rapid detoxification that is m<strong>ed</strong>ically safe and preferr<strong>ed</strong> bypatients to the alternative <strong>of</strong> clonidine alone or clonidine plus naltrexone inheroin- or methadone-stabiliz<strong>ed</strong> patients. The details for such a buprenorphineprotocol are also provid<strong>ed</strong> in Figure 26.1.Another method <strong>of</strong> opiate detoxification has been term<strong>ed</strong> “rapid” or“ultrarapid” detoxification in which withdrawal is precipitat<strong>ed</strong> by administration<strong>of</strong> either naloxone or naltrexone, with heavy s<strong>ed</strong>ation or anesthesia to easewithdrawal symptoms. This proc<strong>ed</strong>ure produces more severe withdrawal thanstandard opioid detoxification proc<strong>ed</strong>ures, but the hypothesis is that the use <strong>of</strong>an opioid antagonist to induce withdrawal will curtail the duration <strong>of</strong> the withdrawalsyndrome. This proc<strong>ed</strong>ure has been associat<strong>ed</strong> with severe adverseevents, including complications <strong>of</strong> anesthesia, severe withdrawal symptomslasting for several days following the proc<strong>ed</strong>ure, and, rarely, death (Badenoch,2002; Cucchia, Monat, Spagnoli, Ferrero, & Gertschy, 1998; O’Connor &Kosten, 1998; Rabinowitz, Cohen, & Atias, 2002; Scherbaum et al., 1998).Furthermore, this proc<strong>ed</strong>ure has not been associat<strong>ed</strong> with better long-term outcomesin terms <strong>of</strong> relapse to opiate dependence, calling into question theexpense and risk <strong>of</strong> the proc<strong>ed</strong>ure relative to other proc<strong>ed</strong>ures for opioidwithdrawal (Cucchia et al., 1998; Lawental, 2000; Rabinowitz et al., 2002;Scherbaum et al., 1998).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!