11.07.2015 Views

Clinical Textbook of Addictive Disorders 3rd ed - R. Frances, S. Miller, A. Mack (Guilford, 2005) WW

Clinical Textbook of Addictive Disorders 3rd ed - R. Frances, S. Miller, A. Mack (Guilford, 2005) WW

Clinical Textbook of Addictive Disorders 3rd ed - R. Frances, S. Miller, A. Mack (Guilford, 2005) WW

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

362 IV. SPECIAL POPULATIONSdrawal from any substance, but especially alcohol, benzodiazepines, or others<strong>ed</strong>atives. It is common for those who are surrendering to have had a “last hit”before entering incarceration. For long-term users who are not actively intoxicat<strong>ed</strong>or in withdrawal, the opportunity to be referr<strong>ed</strong> to rehabilitation programscan be miss<strong>ed</strong>. M<strong>ed</strong>ical screening at intake can likewise be <strong>of</strong> greatimportance, because it alone may produce evidence <strong>of</strong> an SUD. Conversely, ahistory <strong>of</strong> an SUD prompts further, specializ<strong>ed</strong> m<strong>ed</strong>ical assessment. These individualsare at high risk for infectious diseases such as human immunodeficiencyvirus (HIV) and the viral hepatidities, especially hepatitis C (Baillargeon et al.,2003).Screening instruments and other manner <strong>of</strong> case finding ne<strong>ed</strong> to be appropriatefor the setting. In general, searching for SUDs among the incarcerat<strong>ed</strong> isdifficult because <strong>of</strong> a high degree <strong>of</strong> antisocial personality style, which includesdenial and sometimes the wish not to attend to one’s addiction. For this reason,the authority must use instruments or simple assumptions to lead to the case.Instruments such as the Michigan Alcoholism Screening Test (MAST) and theCAGE Questionnaire are helpful in the assessment <strong>of</strong> alcohol use in the primarycare setting but have not been specifically assess<strong>ed</strong> for use among prisoners.It is likely that the single best means <strong>of</strong> finding cases is through face-to-faceclinical evaluations with nonaggressive interviewing styles. Additionally, findingson physical examinations, such as spider angiomata, ne<strong>ed</strong>le tracks, nasalseptum injuries, or autonomic arousal may trigger suspicion. Testing <strong>of</strong> bodyfluids or hair is seen as costly and inefficient, since it basically serves to confirmeither use in the past days or at some point in the past 3 months. Nonetheless,urine, blood, and hair testing, which all have high rates <strong>of</strong> sensitivity and specificityfor cannabis, opiates, benzodiazepines, and alcohol, can help (see Chapter4, this volume). Screening for SUDs must also be gear<strong>ed</strong> to detect comorbidpsychiatric conditions, which are common among the addict<strong>ed</strong> incarcerat<strong>ed</strong>population.Long-Term IncarcerationFor those who remain in custody for months or years, another approach isne<strong>ed</strong><strong>ed</strong>. In this setting, there is the opportunity for treatment and possibly rehabilitation.On the other hand, drugs and alcohol also make their way to prisoners.Authorities and clinicians must be ready to address both issues.There is great variation in the available resources given to long-term treatment<strong>of</strong> addictions among the incarcerat<strong>ed</strong>. Unfortunately, many prison systemsdo not address addiction in long-term inmates. Or in some systems, addictionis address<strong>ed</strong> only in the last months <strong>of</strong> incarceration. On the other hand,other systems have ongoing Alcoholics Anonymous (AA) meetings, <strong>ed</strong>ucation,and group, and even individual, psychotherapies.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!