11.07.2015 Views

Clinical Textbook of Addictive Disorders 3rd ed - R. Frances, S. Miller, A. Mack (Guilford, 2005) WW

Clinical Textbook of Addictive Disorders 3rd ed - R. Frances, S. Miller, A. Mack (Guilford, 2005) WW

Clinical Textbook of Addictive Disorders 3rd ed - R. Frances, S. Miller, A. Mack (Guilford, 2005) WW

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1. The Neurobiology <strong>of</strong> Substance Dependence 13that produce feelings <strong>of</strong> pleasure (Kosten & Kleber, 1984). An individual whois adequately dos<strong>ed</strong> with naltrexone does not obtain any pleasure from addictiveopioids and is less motivat<strong>ed</strong> to use them. An interesting neurobiologicaleffect <strong>of</strong> naltrexone is that it appears to increase the number <strong>of</strong> available muopiate receptors, which may help to renormalize the imbalance between thereceptors and G-protein coupling to cyclic AMP (Kosten, 1990). Naltrexone isalso sometimes us<strong>ed</strong> to detoxify patients rapidly from opioid dependence. Inthis situation, while naltrexone keeps the addictive opioid molecules away fromthe mu receptors, clonidine may help to suppress the opioid-induc<strong>ed</strong> excessiveNA output that is a primary cause <strong>of</strong> withdrawal (Kosten, 1990). Clonidine iscapable <strong>of</strong> this withdrawal relief because alpha-adrenergic autoreceptors are colocaliz<strong>ed</strong>with mu opiate receptors on the neurons <strong>of</strong> the LC, and both receptortypes inhibit cyclic AMP synthesis through similar inhibitory G proteins.Buprenorphine’s action on the mu opioid receptors elicits two differenttherapeutic responses within the brain cells, depending on the dose. At lowdoses, buprenorphine has effects like methadone, but at high doses, it behaveslike naltrexone, blocking the receptors so strongly that it can precipitate withdrawalin highly dependent patients (i.e., those maintain<strong>ed</strong> on more than 40mg methadone daily). Several clinical trials have shown that buprenorphine isas effective as methadone, when us<strong>ed</strong> in sufficient doses (Kosten, Schottenfeld,Zi<strong>ed</strong>onis, & Falcioni, 1993; Oliveto, Feingold, Schottenfeld, Jatlow, & Kosten,1999; Schottenfeld, Pakes, Oliveto, Zi<strong>ed</strong>onis, & Kosten, 1997). Buprenorphinehas a safety advantage over methadone, since high doses precipitate withdrawalrather than the suppression <strong>of</strong> consciousness and respiration seen in overdoses<strong>of</strong> methadone and heroin. Thus, buprenorphine has less overdose potentialthan methadone, since it blocks other opioids and even itself as the dosageincreases. Finally, buprenorphine can be given three times per week, simplifyingobserv<strong>ed</strong> ingestion during the early weeks <strong>of</strong> treatment.SUMMARYDependence and addiction are most appropriately understood as chronic m<strong>ed</strong>icaldisorders, with frequent recurrences to be expect<strong>ed</strong>. The neurobiology <strong>of</strong>these disorders is becoming well understood, but much remains unknown aboutthe genomic mechanisms that pr<strong>ed</strong>ispose to addictions and that are activat<strong>ed</strong>,perhaps irreversibly, by long-term drug use. The mesolimbic reward systemappears to be central to the development <strong>of</strong> the direct clinical consequences <strong>of</strong>chronic abuse, including tolerance, dependence, and addiction. Other brainareas and neurochemicals, including cortisol, also are relevant to dependenceand relapse. Pharmacological interventions for addiction are highly effective foropiates, and we have illustrat<strong>ed</strong> three different approaches using an agonist, anantagonist, or a partial agonist. However, given the complex biological, psycho-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!