11.07.2015 Views

Clinical Textbook of Addictive Disorders 3rd ed - R. Frances, S. Miller, A. Mack (Guilford, 2005) WW

Clinical Textbook of Addictive Disorders 3rd ed - R. Frances, S. Miller, A. Mack (Guilford, 2005) WW

Clinical Textbook of Addictive Disorders 3rd ed - R. Frances, S. Miller, A. Mack (Guilford, 2005) WW

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

24. Family-Bas<strong>ed</strong> Treatment 549(Stanton & Todd, 1981; Stanton, Todd, et al., 1982). The families <strong>of</strong> addictsare particularly difficult to engage in such an endeavor. Fathers, in particular,<strong>of</strong>ten appear threaten<strong>ed</strong> by treatment and defensive about their contribution tothe problem. Because many have drinking problems themselves, they may als<strong>of</strong>ear being blam<strong>ed</strong>.Experienc<strong>ed</strong> family therapists, recognizing this hesitancy to participate intherapy, work hard to recruit families into therapy. They do not rely on otherfamily members to do the recruiting, because this approach <strong>of</strong>ten fails. Instead,they work energetically and enthusiastically to extend personal invitations tothe reluctant. With emotionally healthier families, one telephone call mayenable a therapist to reassure family members that their contributions areimportant to the solution <strong>of</strong> the substance abuse. With less healthy families, itmay be necessary to meet on “neutral turf” (e.g., a restaurant), to write multipleletters, or even (Stanton, Steier, & Todd, 1982) to pay family members for participationin treatment. Wermuth and Scheidt (1986) and Stanton and associates(Stanton & Todd, 1981; Stanton, Todd, et al., 1982) have describ<strong>ed</strong>engagement proc<strong>ed</strong>ures in considerable detail, the latter group also presenting21 principles for getting reluctant families into therapy.Control <strong>of</strong> the CaseTo shift the responsibility for dealing with the substance abuser’s problems tothe family, a family therapist ne<strong>ed</strong>s to have command <strong>of</strong> the case. The familytherapist must be allow<strong>ed</strong> (e.g., by other elements in the treatment system) todirect the overall case management, including the treatment plan, the use <strong>of</strong>m<strong>ed</strong>ication and drug tests (see below), and decisions about hospitalization.When one therapist is in charge, substance abusers are less likely to manipulaterelationships among treatment pr<strong>of</strong>essionals.Stanton, Todd, and colleagues (1982) estimat<strong>ed</strong> that approximately halfthe effectiveness <strong>of</strong> treatment <strong>of</strong> drug addicts and their families depends on theefficiency and cohesiveness <strong>of</strong> the treatment system. If family members receivevari<strong>ed</strong> advice, they <strong>of</strong>ten end up arguing about the therapy rather than workingtoward recovery. Cohesion in the treatment system <strong>of</strong> substance abusers necessarilyincludes the self-help programs us<strong>ed</strong> by their families. Again, it is vital fortherapists to know the local self-help groups and to collaborate with them forthe sake <strong>of</strong> their clients.M<strong>ed</strong>ication and ManagementFamily therapists who work with substance abusers and their families must haveat least a basic knowl<strong>ed</strong>ge <strong>of</strong> pharmacology. This information aids them duringthe detoxification process and r<strong>ed</strong>uces the overcaution in the use <strong>of</strong> m<strong>ed</strong>icationsthat sometimes occurs among less inform<strong>ed</strong> therapists.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!