11.07.2015 Views

Clinical Textbook of Addictive Disorders 3rd ed - R. Frances, S. Miller, A. Mack (Guilford, 2005) WW

Clinical Textbook of Addictive Disorders 3rd ed - R. Frances, S. Miller, A. Mack (Guilford, 2005) WW

Clinical Textbook of Addictive Disorders 3rd ed - R. Frances, S. Miller, A. Mack (Guilford, 2005) WW

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3. Psychological Evaluation 45substance use disorder between childhood and young adulthood (Tarter et al.,2003). These findings indicate that a core disorder <strong>of</strong> psychological selfregulationunderlies the risk for substance abuse (Tarter, Kirisci, Habeych,Reynolds, & Vanyukov, 2004). It should be emphasiz<strong>ed</strong>, however, that there issubstantial population heterogeneity with respect to the expression <strong>of</strong> thesethree domains <strong>of</strong> psychological functioning. At the individual level, therefore,a disturbance may be confin<strong>ed</strong> to only one area <strong>of</strong> functioning, may pervade allpsychological domains, or (theoretically, at least) may not be present to a significantdegree in any <strong>of</strong> the three areas.METHODS OF PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENTThe overarching purpose <strong>of</strong> a psychological evaluation is to identify and quantifyseverity <strong>of</strong> problems integral to substance abuse that are amenable tomodification. Bas<strong>ed</strong> on evaluation results, interventions can thus be direct<strong>ed</strong> atchanging the individual, the environment, or the quality <strong>of</strong> person–environmentinteraction to assist the client in terminating substance consumptionfrom the person’s behavioral repertoire.In addition to promoting an intervention strategy, psychological assessment<strong>of</strong>fers the opportunity to monitor quantitatively changes occurring duringthe course <strong>of</strong> treatment. The use <strong>of</strong> brief standardiz<strong>ed</strong> self-report checklists orrating scales, for example, facilitates objective and quantitative documentation<strong>of</strong> therapeutic progress. One multivariate instrument design<strong>ed</strong> for this purposeis the revis<strong>ed</strong> Drug Use Screening Inventory (Tarter, 1990). The obtain<strong>ed</strong>information not only provides ongoing fe<strong>ed</strong>back to the clinician but also servesthe purpose <strong>of</strong> goal setting for the client. Furthermore, demonstrating to the clientvia objective and quantitative indices that he or she is benefiting fromtreatment serves the important purpose <strong>of</strong> sustaining motivation for continu<strong>ed</strong>investment in the rehabilitation. The following discussion reviews the mostcommonly us<strong>ed</strong> instruments for drug and alcohol assessment.Alcohol and Drug UseConsumption <strong>of</strong> alcohol and other drugs is closely link<strong>ed</strong> to developmental processes.Not surprisingly, therefore, it unfolds in a more or less regular order.Typically, consumption begins with licit compounds (alcohol, tobacco) andprogresses, if at all, to the use <strong>of</strong> illicit drugs. Although much has been writtenabout the gateway hypothesis, in which drug use staging is presumably influenc<strong>ed</strong>by prior history <strong>of</strong> drug use (Kandel, 1975), the evidence to support thisspeculation is at best equivocal (Morral, McCaffrey, & Paddock, 2002). Rather,the progression across stages <strong>of</strong> substance use is most parsimoniously explain<strong>ed</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!