11.07.2015 Views

Clinical Textbook of Addictive Disorders 3rd ed - R. Frances, S. Miller, A. Mack (Guilford, 2005) WW

Clinical Textbook of Addictive Disorders 3rd ed - R. Frances, S. Miller, A. Mack (Guilford, 2005) WW

Clinical Textbook of Addictive Disorders 3rd ed - R. Frances, S. Miller, A. Mack (Guilford, 2005) WW

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

250 IV. SPECIAL POPULATIONSdisorder diagnoses is increas<strong>ed</strong> when comparing clinical to community samples,and the highest rates <strong>of</strong> comorbid mental disorders–SUDs are typically found ininstitutional populations, including psychiatric units, substance abuse programs,and jails and prisons (Hien, Zimberg, Weisman, First, & Ackerman,1997; Jordan, Schlenger, Fairbank, & Caddell, 1996; Kokkevi & Stefanis, 1995;Regier et al., 1990). This is due in part to the selection bias that those mostlikely admitt<strong>ed</strong> to treatment programs are people with impairment due to theirdrug use. Because <strong>of</strong> higher severity, they are at higher risk for an additionalsubstance use diagnosis than other drug users.Comorbidity <strong>of</strong> various substance use and other mental disorders tends tocluster among certain subsets <strong>of</strong> the general population, such that more thanhalf <strong>of</strong> the lifetime alcohol, drug, and mental disorders diagnoses can be foundamong about 14% <strong>of</strong> the population (Kessler et al., 1994). In any year, almost59% <strong>of</strong> the community sample with an alcohol, drug, or other mental (ADM)disorder meet criteria for three or more lifetime ADM disorders (Kessler et al.,1994). Therefore, compar<strong>ed</strong> to the community, treatment settings that aggregatethose with SUDs are also most likely to cohort people at the highest riskfor multiple SUDs. This is borne out in large-scale family genetics studies. Forexample, in the Collaborative Study on the Genetics <strong>of</strong> Alcoholism (COGA),among 1,212 subjects with definite alcohol dependence, recruit<strong>ed</strong> from addictiontreatment centers, 62% had an additional diagnosis <strong>of</strong> cannabis and/orcocaine dependence (Bierut et al., 1998).Treatment Episode Data Set (TEDS) data over the period 1992–2001 consistentlyreveal<strong>ed</strong> that about half <strong>of</strong> treatment admissions have report<strong>ed</strong> multipleSUDs (SAMHSA, 2003b). This means that in addition to the index substancefor which the patient was admitt<strong>ed</strong> to treatment, a substantial portion <strong>of</strong>patients are also abusing other substances. The SAMHSA-sponsor<strong>ed</strong> NationalSurvey <strong>of</strong> Substance Abuse Treatment Services (NSSATS) demonstrat<strong>ed</strong> that<strong>of</strong> the 1,123,239 people receiving treatment in 13,720 responding facilities in2002, 48% were being treat<strong>ed</strong> for abuse or dependence on both alcohol and atleast one other substance (SAMHSA, 2003a). Thirty-one percent were intreatment for drug use disorders only, while the remaining 21% were in treatmentfor alcohol use disorders only. Similarly, data from the 2001 TEDSreveal<strong>ed</strong> that 54% <strong>of</strong> all persons admitt<strong>ed</strong> to substance abuse treatmentreport<strong>ed</strong> multiple substance use, and approximately 42% <strong>of</strong> all admissionsreport<strong>ed</strong> problems with both alcohol and drugs (SAMHSA, 2003b). Alcoholand opiates were report<strong>ed</strong> more <strong>of</strong>ten as primary substances than as secondarysubstances (TEDS; SAMHSA, 2003b). The most commonly report<strong>ed</strong> secondarysubstances were alcohol, marijuana/hashish, and cocaine.Multiple Substance Use <strong>Disorders</strong>The increas<strong>ed</strong> risk <strong>of</strong> comorbidity among treatment-seeking populations overthat <strong>of</strong> the general population has clinical implications for the outcome <strong>of</strong> treat-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!