multipurpose tree species research for small farms: strategies ... - part
multipurpose tree species research for small farms: strategies ... - part
multipurpose tree species research for small farms: strategies ... - part
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>small</strong>-scale charcoal manufacturing. Trees<br />
selected <strong>for</strong> the project include Eucal)ptus<br />
camaldulensis and Lcucaena leucocephala,with<br />
Calliandracalothyrsus and Eucalyptus deghpta<br />
planted <strong>for</strong> beekeeping.<br />
According to an FAO study of the project,<br />
the farmers' response "was lukewarm at first <strong>for</strong><br />
several reasons. As there was no critical shortage<br />
of fuelwood in the area, there was little perceived<br />
need to plant <strong>tree</strong>s <strong>for</strong> this purpose. In addition,<br />
people felt it wonld not benefit them to plant <strong>tree</strong>s,<br />
<strong>for</strong> in their experience it was illegal to fell <strong>tree</strong>s in a<br />
reserved <strong>for</strong>est area. The very concept of<br />
agro<strong>for</strong>estry was alien to these maize farmers who<br />
felt that planting <strong>tree</strong>s in their fields would<br />
interfere with tractor plowing."<br />
But as the project was implemented over the<br />
years, it was found that "56 percent of the farmers<br />
had established hedgerows around their homelots<br />
and 51 percent started to plant non-fruit <strong>tree</strong>s.<br />
However, only three percent had at any time<br />
<strong>part</strong>icipated in establishing or managing village<br />
woodlots."<br />
Charcoal production was initiated by installing<br />
a beehive kiln to demonstrate improved charcoal<br />
production technology. It appeared to motivate<br />
few farmers to install kilns of their own.<br />
The most product vc activity of the project was<br />
the introduction of pasture grasses to provide<br />
fodd" <strong>for</strong> cattle. A study showed that compared<br />
with the insignificant cattle raising at the start of<br />
the project, it had become " a rather important<br />
activity.., herds of 40-50 head were not unusual if<br />
not yet very common."<br />
Fruit <strong>tree</strong>swere readily accepted ad vere<br />
producing income <strong>for</strong> the farmers who had<br />
received the grafting materials in the earlier phase<br />
of the project.<br />
Beekeeping was an introduced innovation.<br />
Interested farmers were trained in basic<br />
techniques. A <strong>small</strong>-scale local industry<br />
developed, producing beekeeping boxes and<br />
frames, new bee colonies, and honey. Theby<br />
fm roduction was so successful that the <strong>part</strong>icipating<br />
Farmers expressed interest in marketing the honey<br />
on a wider scale.<br />
These instances of <strong>tree</strong>-related activities indicate<br />
that the adoption of <strong>tree</strong> based innovations are<br />
likely to be successful when ihe activity generates<br />
an income. The aim should focus more on income<br />
generation, as in the example of the honeybees,<br />
than on the wood produced from woodlots.<br />
107<br />
The project also illustrates the futility of<br />
implementing community-blased projects which<br />
do not attract the <strong>part</strong>icipation of tie villagers<br />
in the area. One reason <strong>for</strong> this may be hat the<br />
<strong>for</strong>est village communities are new settlements<br />
created by the project and do not have the<br />
Lommunity spirit found in older, more<br />
established villages. The villagers in the project<br />
area did not face the same fuclwood constraints<br />
as in other villages. Hence the lack of<br />
involvement in the community ,voodlot idea.<br />
In conclusion, the factors that seem to be<br />
important in determining the adoptioti of<br />
innovations involving <strong>tree</strong>s in <strong>small</strong> farm systems<br />
include:<br />
- a clear demonstration of prolitabilitv o<br />
the adopter, <strong>part</strong>icularly in terms of cash<br />
gains, relative to other income earning<br />
opportunities;<br />
- availability of technical support to help<br />
with problems in the early stages of<br />
adoption;<br />
- the innovation may be individually focused<br />
or community based, depending on the status<br />
of the <strong>part</strong>icular resource: and<br />
- trce-bascd innovations should be consideced<br />
<strong>for</strong> adoption using the same criteria as <strong>for</strong><br />
other agricultural innovations.<br />
A Logit Framework <strong>for</strong> Anal)zing<br />
Farmers' Responses to MPTS<br />
(;ivcn the importance of individual responses<br />
in the adoption process,<br />
analyze<br />
it is<br />
the<br />
useful<br />
likely<br />
to be able to<br />
outcome of an extension<br />
program in order t:) t;iilor the program to meet<br />
the farmers' needs. A statistical model is<br />
proposed <strong>for</strong> this purpose.<br />
The Logit Model<br />
The Iogit model is an instrument <strong>for</strong><br />
st gitsmodlli an instme fo<br />
individuals. The distinct advantage of this<br />
dependent<br />
model is that variable it allows is discrete, an analysis either where yes the or no,<br />
deedn and not the vaibei-icee relative magnitude of ihryso the response. o<br />
The use of this analytical technique is well<br />
knoki in bioassay, and was adopted in the late<br />
1970s to study economic behavior in ,uch fields<br />
as urban transportation and in the analysis of<br />
the labor market.