29.11.2012 Views

multipurpose tree species research for small farms: strategies ... - part

multipurpose tree species research for small farms: strategies ... - part

multipurpose tree species research for small farms: strategies ... - part

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>small</strong>-scale charcoal manufacturing. Trees<br />

selected <strong>for</strong> the project include Eucal)ptus<br />

camaldulensis and Lcucaena leucocephala,with<br />

Calliandracalothyrsus and Eucalyptus deghpta<br />

planted <strong>for</strong> beekeeping.<br />

According to an FAO study of the project,<br />

the farmers' response "was lukewarm at first <strong>for</strong><br />

several reasons. As there was no critical shortage<br />

of fuelwood in the area, there was little perceived<br />

need to plant <strong>tree</strong>s <strong>for</strong> this purpose. In addition,<br />

people felt it wonld not benefit them to plant <strong>tree</strong>s,<br />

<strong>for</strong> in their experience it was illegal to fell <strong>tree</strong>s in a<br />

reserved <strong>for</strong>est area. The very concept of<br />

agro<strong>for</strong>estry was alien to these maize farmers who<br />

felt that planting <strong>tree</strong>s in their fields would<br />

interfere with tractor plowing."<br />

But as the project was implemented over the<br />

years, it was found that "56 percent of the farmers<br />

had established hedgerows around their homelots<br />

and 51 percent started to plant non-fruit <strong>tree</strong>s.<br />

However, only three percent had at any time<br />

<strong>part</strong>icipated in establishing or managing village<br />

woodlots."<br />

Charcoal production was initiated by installing<br />

a beehive kiln to demonstrate improved charcoal<br />

production technology. It appeared to motivate<br />

few farmers to install kilns of their own.<br />

The most product vc activity of the project was<br />

the introduction of pasture grasses to provide<br />

fodd" <strong>for</strong> cattle. A study showed that compared<br />

with the insignificant cattle raising at the start of<br />

the project, it had become " a rather important<br />

activity.., herds of 40-50 head were not unusual if<br />

not yet very common."<br />

Fruit <strong>tree</strong>swere readily accepted ad vere<br />

producing income <strong>for</strong> the farmers who had<br />

received the grafting materials in the earlier phase<br />

of the project.<br />

Beekeeping was an introduced innovation.<br />

Interested farmers were trained in basic<br />

techniques. A <strong>small</strong>-scale local industry<br />

developed, producing beekeeping boxes and<br />

frames, new bee colonies, and honey. Theby<br />

fm roduction was so successful that the <strong>part</strong>icipating<br />

Farmers expressed interest in marketing the honey<br />

on a wider scale.<br />

These instances of <strong>tree</strong>-related activities indicate<br />

that the adoption of <strong>tree</strong> based innovations are<br />

likely to be successful when ihe activity generates<br />

an income. The aim should focus more on income<br />

generation, as in the example of the honeybees,<br />

than on the wood produced from woodlots.<br />

107<br />

The project also illustrates the futility of<br />

implementing community-blased projects which<br />

do not attract the <strong>part</strong>icipation of tie villagers<br />

in the area. One reason <strong>for</strong> this may be hat the<br />

<strong>for</strong>est village communities are new settlements<br />

created by the project and do not have the<br />

Lommunity spirit found in older, more<br />

established villages. The villagers in the project<br />

area did not face the same fuclwood constraints<br />

as in other villages. Hence the lack of<br />

involvement in the community ,voodlot idea.<br />

In conclusion, the factors that seem to be<br />

important in determining the adoptioti of<br />

innovations involving <strong>tree</strong>s in <strong>small</strong> farm systems<br />

include:<br />

- a clear demonstration of prolitabilitv o<br />

the adopter, <strong>part</strong>icularly in terms of cash<br />

gains, relative to other income earning<br />

opportunities;<br />

- availability of technical support to help<br />

with problems in the early stages of<br />

adoption;<br />

- the innovation may be individually focused<br />

or community based, depending on the status<br />

of the <strong>part</strong>icular resource: and<br />

- trce-bascd innovations should be consideced<br />

<strong>for</strong> adoption using the same criteria as <strong>for</strong><br />

other agricultural innovations.<br />

A Logit Framework <strong>for</strong> Anal)zing<br />

Farmers' Responses to MPTS<br />

(;ivcn the importance of individual responses<br />

in the adoption process,<br />

analyze<br />

it is<br />

the<br />

useful<br />

likely<br />

to be able to<br />

outcome of an extension<br />

program in order t:) t;iilor the program to meet<br />

the farmers' needs. A statistical model is<br />

proposed <strong>for</strong> this purpose.<br />

The Logit Model<br />

The Iogit model is an instrument <strong>for</strong><br />

st gitsmodlli an instme fo<br />

individuals. The distinct advantage of this<br />

dependent<br />

model is that variable it allows is discrete, an analysis either where yes the or no,<br />

deedn and not the vaibei-icee relative magnitude of ihryso the response. o<br />

The use of this analytical technique is well<br />

knoki in bioassay, and was adopted in the late<br />

1970s to study economic behavior in ,uch fields<br />

as urban transportation and in the analysis of<br />

the labor market.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!