multipurpose tree species research for small farms: strategies ... - part
multipurpose tree species research for small farms: strategies ... - part
multipurpose tree species research for small farms: strategies ... - part
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
the mother <strong>tree</strong>s <strong>for</strong> their homegardens. The<br />
e.;amples of selection and propagation of <strong>tree</strong>s<br />
on private lands in Thailand strongly sugest<br />
that this may be a more common practice than<br />
ordinarily recognized. Where this is the case,<br />
the barefoot <strong>tree</strong> breeder has a base population<br />
to select from which has already started through<br />
the process of selection.<br />
Cooperation between trained <strong>tree</strong> breeders<br />
and this new class of barefoot <strong>tree</strong> breeders is<br />
essential. Table I provides an example of the<br />
division of responsibilities between traditional<br />
and community-based <strong>tree</strong> breeders that has<br />
been employed with <strong>for</strong>estry plantation workers<br />
and <strong>part</strong>-time farmers in eastern Thailand.<br />
Methodology<br />
Many different approaches might be taken to<br />
encourage and assist farmers in improving<br />
MPTS. The methodology outlined in this paper<br />
provides a detailed division of responsibilities<br />
between farmer or "barefoot <strong>tree</strong> breeder" and<br />
<strong>for</strong>est geneticist.<br />
Asby et al. (1989) asked farmers to rank ten<br />
bush bean varieties in Colombia, then asked a<br />
trained plant breeder from the International<br />
Center <strong>for</strong> Tropical Agriculture (CIAT) to do<br />
the same. The final ranking of bean varieties by<br />
farmers and the plant breeder in this<br />
pre-screening were similar, yet differed<br />
primarily because farmers felt the most<br />
important criterion <strong>for</strong> selection was grain size.<br />
The plant breeder ranked the varieties in terms<br />
of anticipated acceptability to farmers.<br />
A similar method was tested in the field with<br />
farm workers from the Thai Plywood Company<br />
on the Lad Krating Plantation. Farmers were<br />
asked to identify pus <strong>tree</strong>s of Eucalyptus<br />
catnaldudensis,then the sanie population of<br />
<strong>tree</strong>s was screened by a trained <strong>for</strong>est geneticist.<br />
The general steps in this process arc outlined<br />
in Table 2. This procedure was tested at Lad<br />
Krating as the methodology was developed. A<br />
key to the development of enhanced <strong>tree</strong><br />
selection skills of farmers or barefoot <strong>tree</strong><br />
breeders is the use of appropriate resources of<br />
both farmer/breeder and <strong>for</strong>est geneticist.<br />
Results<br />
Case One<br />
Plus <strong>tree</strong>s were selected from MPTS<br />
network trials in Lad Krating, Chachoengsaeo<br />
Province. The trials include Acacia<br />
auriculi<strong>for</strong>nnis (genotypes 15477 and 15648),<br />
Acacia mangitwn (genotypes 15677 and 15642),<br />
Leucaena diversifolia (K156) and aL.<br />
leucocephalax L. diversifolia hybrid (K743) as<br />
<strong>part</strong> of a factorial treatment design. Farmers<br />
were asked to select plus <strong>tree</strong>s with vigorous<br />
rowth, straight stem, <strong>small</strong> size of low live<br />
granches, and no pest damage. Farmers<br />
marked the plus <strong>tree</strong>s with plastic tape which<br />
were later checked and reselected by trained<br />
<strong>tree</strong> breeders.<br />
Selection per<strong>for</strong>mance varied little between<br />
farmers and trained <strong>for</strong>est geneticists, with<br />
rejection of only a few <strong>tree</strong>s due to the poor<br />
leader development in A. maniqtni. Table 3<br />
shows the number of selected <strong>tree</strong>s and the<br />
superiority of plus <strong>tree</strong>s compared to the base<br />
porulatior,. High genetic variability in the<br />
Leucaena hyibrid demonstrated high superiority<br />
of the selected plus <strong>tree</strong>s. This exercise<br />
indicated the ability of barefoot <strong>tree</strong> breeders to<br />
carry out effective mass selection with little<br />
additional training.<br />
Case Two<br />
Barefoot <strong>tree</strong> farmers were asked to select<br />
superior clones of E. catnaldulensis, the main<br />
<strong>tree</strong> <strong>species</strong> at the Lad Krating Plantation.<br />
Trees were planted at a spacing of 2x4 and<br />
4x4m. In the early ycars 1982-1984), the seeds<br />
were from unclassified seed sources and<br />
superior local <strong>tree</strong>s. Seed from Australia<br />
(Pct<strong>for</strong>d and Gilbert provenances) have been<br />
used since 1987. The total population is about<br />
one million <strong>tree</strong>s.<br />
Barefoot <strong>tree</strong> breeders were asked to select<br />
<strong>tree</strong>s with vigorous growth, straight round<br />
stems, symmetry in crown development, which<br />
were pest free and superior to adjacent <strong>tree</strong>s.<br />
The first intensive selection was carried out by<br />
six farmers over three weeks and resulted in 540<br />
selected <strong>tree</strong>s, or about 1:1,850. After the first<br />
evaluation, the barefoot <strong>tree</strong> breeders were<br />
asked to further refine the screeiiing, being<br />
more selective. The second, more intensive<br />
selection yielded 250 <strong>tree</strong>s, or about 1:4,000.<br />
The results of the second selection were very<br />
The results of the plus <strong>tree</strong> selection exercise similar to those of the trained <strong>tree</strong> breeder.<br />
by barefoot <strong>tree</strong> breeders and <strong>for</strong>est geneticists<br />
are presented in Table 3.<br />
151