29.11.2012 Views

multipurpose tree species research for small farms: strategies ... - part

multipurpose tree species research for small farms: strategies ... - part

multipurpose tree species research for small farms: strategies ... - part

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

the project and at an interest rate of 10%, the<br />

EIRR is27%, the switching vah,e, also at 10%,<br />

foi bcniefits of -65% and costs of 190%.<br />

Fourth Tree Crops Project, Sri Lanka<br />

Economic analysis. The financial return <strong>for</strong><br />

tea and rubber has been rpted as acceptable<br />

while <strong>for</strong> coconuts it is marginal. FIRR <strong>for</strong> the<br />

corporations is estimated to be 18-19%. The<br />

economic analysis studied the economic<br />

benefits from increased production of tea,<br />

rubber, coconuts, and the costs. The EIRR <strong>for</strong><br />

the proect as a whole is 26%, and <strong>for</strong> fuelwood<br />

it is 50 %. The switching value at the 10%<br />

cutoff rate <strong>for</strong> Sri Lanka <strong>for</strong> incremental<br />

benefits is -86% with investment costs at 613%.<br />

Northeast Region Woodfuels Supply<br />

Preinvestment Study, Thailand<br />

Cost recovery. A portion of the project<br />

seedlingproduction and other plantation<br />

establis ment costs would be recovered through<br />

seedling sales and collection of timber harvests.<br />

Appendix. List of projects.<br />

ADB. 1977. Nepal: Sagarnath Forestry Development Project. NEP:AP-18.<br />

ADB. 1981. Bangladesh: Community Forestry Project. BAN:AP-36.<br />

This would represent about 44% of the total<br />

cost of the seedling supply. Plantation<br />

establishment costs incurred by I - government<br />

would be about 22%. The rest v, uld be paid by<br />

the private sector or <strong>part</strong>icipatio-, institutions<br />

and community groups. The goernment could<br />

recover about 50% of the estah::hment costs<br />

<strong>for</strong> the rehabilitation and re<strong>for</strong>estation of<br />

encroached <strong>for</strong>est reserve land through<br />

intermediate and final timber harvest proceeds<br />

under one option, and up to 97% under another.<br />

Economic analysis. The FIRR is.estimated<br />

from 23-44% depending on the activity, ie. farm<br />

<strong>for</strong>estry under agro<strong>for</strong>estry yields a return of<br />

44%, while a village woodlot is only 23%. The<br />

EIRR <strong>for</strong> planting isestimated from 24% <strong>for</strong><br />

commercial woodfuel plantations to 38% <strong>for</strong><br />

rehabilitation of encroached <strong>for</strong>est reserve land.<br />

For the entire project, the EIRR would be 18%,<br />

without <strong>research</strong> and development activities the<br />

rate would be 19%. The switching value would<br />

be a 36% increase in cost and a 26% decrease in<br />

benefits at an interest rate of 12%.<br />

UNDPIBRD. 1987. Thailand: Northeast Regional Woodfuels Supply Pre-investment Study. (Draft).<br />

IBRD Staff appraisal reports:<br />

1979. India: Uttar Fradesh Social Forestry Project. No. 2386a-IN.<br />

1980. India: Kandi Watershed and Area Development Project, Punjab. No. 2174a-IN.<br />

1981. India: West Bengal Social Forestry Froject. No. 3434-IN.<br />

1983. India: Karnataka Social Forestry Project. No. 4590a-IN.<br />

1983. India: Himalayan Watershed Management Project, Uttar Pradesh. No. 4317-IN.<br />

1985. India: National Social Forestry Project. No. 5591b-IN.<br />

1980. Nepal: Community Forestry Development and Training Project. No. 2663a-NEP.<br />

1983. Nepal: Second Forestry Project. No. 4353-NEP.<br />

1985. Sri Lanka: Fourth Tree Crops Project. No. 5265-CE.<br />

73

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!