multipurpose tree species research for small farms: strategies ... - part
multipurpose tree species research for small farms: strategies ... - part
multipurpose tree species research for small farms: strategies ... - part
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
the project and at an interest rate of 10%, the<br />
EIRR is27%, the switching vah,e, also at 10%,<br />
foi bcniefits of -65% and costs of 190%.<br />
Fourth Tree Crops Project, Sri Lanka<br />
Economic analysis. The financial return <strong>for</strong><br />
tea and rubber has been rpted as acceptable<br />
while <strong>for</strong> coconuts it is marginal. FIRR <strong>for</strong> the<br />
corporations is estimated to be 18-19%. The<br />
economic analysis studied the economic<br />
benefits from increased production of tea,<br />
rubber, coconuts, and the costs. The EIRR <strong>for</strong><br />
the proect as a whole is 26%, and <strong>for</strong> fuelwood<br />
it is 50 %. The switching value at the 10%<br />
cutoff rate <strong>for</strong> Sri Lanka <strong>for</strong> incremental<br />
benefits is -86% with investment costs at 613%.<br />
Northeast Region Woodfuels Supply<br />
Preinvestment Study, Thailand<br />
Cost recovery. A portion of the project<br />
seedlingproduction and other plantation<br />
establis ment costs would be recovered through<br />
seedling sales and collection of timber harvests.<br />
Appendix. List of projects.<br />
ADB. 1977. Nepal: Sagarnath Forestry Development Project. NEP:AP-18.<br />
ADB. 1981. Bangladesh: Community Forestry Project. BAN:AP-36.<br />
This would represent about 44% of the total<br />
cost of the seedling supply. Plantation<br />
establishment costs incurred by I - government<br />
would be about 22%. The rest v, uld be paid by<br />
the private sector or <strong>part</strong>icipatio-, institutions<br />
and community groups. The goernment could<br />
recover about 50% of the estah::hment costs<br />
<strong>for</strong> the rehabilitation and re<strong>for</strong>estation of<br />
encroached <strong>for</strong>est reserve land through<br />
intermediate and final timber harvest proceeds<br />
under one option, and up to 97% under another.<br />
Economic analysis. The FIRR is.estimated<br />
from 23-44% depending on the activity, ie. farm<br />
<strong>for</strong>estry under agro<strong>for</strong>estry yields a return of<br />
44%, while a village woodlot is only 23%. The<br />
EIRR <strong>for</strong> planting isestimated from 24% <strong>for</strong><br />
commercial woodfuel plantations to 38% <strong>for</strong><br />
rehabilitation of encroached <strong>for</strong>est reserve land.<br />
For the entire project, the EIRR would be 18%,<br />
without <strong>research</strong> and development activities the<br />
rate would be 19%. The switching value would<br />
be a 36% increase in cost and a 26% decrease in<br />
benefits at an interest rate of 12%.<br />
UNDPIBRD. 1987. Thailand: Northeast Regional Woodfuels Supply Pre-investment Study. (Draft).<br />
IBRD Staff appraisal reports:<br />
1979. India: Uttar Fradesh Social Forestry Project. No. 2386a-IN.<br />
1980. India: Kandi Watershed and Area Development Project, Punjab. No. 2174a-IN.<br />
1981. India: West Bengal Social Forestry Froject. No. 3434-IN.<br />
1983. India: Karnataka Social Forestry Project. No. 4590a-IN.<br />
1983. India: Himalayan Watershed Management Project, Uttar Pradesh. No. 4317-IN.<br />
1985. India: National Social Forestry Project. No. 5591b-IN.<br />
1980. Nepal: Community Forestry Development and Training Project. No. 2663a-NEP.<br />
1983. Nepal: Second Forestry Project. No. 4353-NEP.<br />
1985. Sri Lanka: Fourth Tree Crops Project. No. 5265-CE.<br />
73