29.11.2012 Views

multipurpose tree species research for small farms: strategies ... - part

multipurpose tree species research for small farms: strategies ... - part

multipurpose tree species research for small farms: strategies ... - part

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Applying Fanning Systems Research Concepts and Methods to the<br />

Development of Multipurpose Tree Species<br />

Richard Hawkins, Achmad Rachman and Hasil Sembiring<br />

The extension to <strong>small</strong> farners of agro<strong>for</strong>cstry<br />

technology involving multipurp ,e<strong>tree</strong> <strong>species</strong><br />

(MPTS) lags behind what is perceived to be<br />

technically feasible. This is similar to the situation<br />

encountered by annual.crop <strong>research</strong>ers and<br />

extensionists 15-20 years ago, which led to the<br />

growth of farming systems <strong>research</strong> (FSR)<br />

concepts and methods.<br />

FSR concepts and methods are reviewed <strong>for</strong><br />

relevance to <strong>research</strong>, extension, and policy making<br />

involvin MPTS technology. The broad approach<br />

to FSR involves a progression from defining<br />

production problems andopportunities <strong>for</strong> better<br />

use ot available production resources, through<br />

design and evaluation of improved technology, to<br />

extension of the new practices on a wider scale.<br />

To use this approach with MiITS, more<br />

emphasis will need to be placed on refining<br />

methods <strong>for</strong> technology testing. Methods currently<br />

used in FSR have not focused on evaluating<br />

technologies providing multiple products over a<br />

period or several years, or which affect long-term<br />

sustainability through soil fertility and erosion<br />

control. In spite of the original intentions of FSR<br />

practitioners, the <strong>part</strong>icipation of farmers in the<br />

design and evaluation of technology also needs to<br />

bc increased.<br />

Current <strong>research</strong> plans and preliminary results<br />

of the Uplands Agriculture Conservation Project<br />

in Java are discusscd. These activities include<br />

farmer meetings, surveys, and experiments<br />

managed by both <strong>research</strong>ers and farmers.<br />

Background<br />

In the early 1970s, there was concern that the<br />

roducts of agricultural <strong>research</strong> were not<br />

enefitting many resource poor farmers of the<br />

world. New technology was usually aimed at<br />

maximizing the yield of a <strong>part</strong>icular commodity,<br />

and did not take into account the compromises<br />

necessary to maximize the overall productivity or<br />

economic return of the whole farm. Researchers<br />

Upland Agriculture (nsarvaion Projet<br />

Salatip, Indonesia<br />

Centre <strong>for</strong> SiLs Research<br />

UACP in Qntirl and East Java, Indonesia<br />

155<br />

with fertile <strong>research</strong> stations, and somebody<br />

else's money, did not take into account the<br />

aspirations, resource base and cash limitations<br />

that determine farmers' choices. Research was<br />

needed to adapt improved technology to<br />

farmers' conditions, a situation not unlike that<br />

concerning technology <strong>for</strong> MPTS today.<br />

Farming systems <strong>research</strong> (FSR) quickly<br />

became the popular remedy <strong>for</strong> this concern.<br />

Just as quickly, FSR included an almost<br />

bcwildering array of different procedures and<br />

termino!ogies. Most of these differences in<br />

procedure can be attributed to the production<br />

environment and problems being addressed by<br />

farmers when procedures were being developed<br />

(Harrington et a/. 1989). Despite the<br />

differences in emphasis and <strong>part</strong>icular <strong>research</strong><br />

methods, most of the procedures share a broad<br />

similarity in underlying philosophy and overall<br />

approach. Fundamental to this approach, and<br />

to what will be referred to as FSR in this paper,<br />

are three points (adapted from Harrington el<br />

al.):<br />

- a diagnostic function, to enable the selection<br />

of <strong>research</strong> priorities relevant to the farmer's<br />

circumstances;<br />

- evaluation of tle interaction between the<br />

introduce'd technology and other components<br />

of the farming system, to determine the<br />

overall impact; and<br />

- the conduct of much of the <strong>research</strong> and<br />

development on-farm, where farmers can<br />

actively <strong>part</strong>icipate in the evaluation of the<br />

techhology.<br />

The objectives of this paper are to review the<br />

utility of FSR methods <strong>for</strong> developing MPTS<br />

technology, assess current and future trends,<br />

and give examples from an FSR project in<br />

Central Java.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!