multipurpose tree species research for small farms: strategies ... - part
multipurpose tree species research for small farms: strategies ... - part
multipurpose tree species research for small farms: strategies ... - part
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
The farmers' choice of <strong>species</strong> leads to the<br />
production of a wide variety of seedlings varying by<br />
location, altitude, and even ethnic group. The<br />
timely availability of the seedlings is a major<br />
concern. The nurseries try to have saplings<br />
available early in the planting season to allow good<br />
seedling establishment be<strong>for</strong>e the dry winter<br />
season.<br />
Discussion and Consequences<br />
In government run nurseries the choice of<br />
<strong>species</strong> depends on the interests cf government<br />
officials and the need to meet numerical targets,<br />
rather than on the farmers' needs. This leads the<br />
government nurseries to produce seedlings that are<br />
easily and quickly raised in large numbers -- not<br />
necessarily <strong>species</strong> preferred by farmers.<br />
Government nurseries emphasize community<br />
planting and are not involved in planting on-private<br />
and. This is <strong>part</strong>ially due to the farmers' belief<br />
that if <strong>tree</strong>s are planted on private land, the whole<br />
site will be reclassified as government controlled<br />
<strong>for</strong>est. This belief has been countered in the LAC<br />
ECA by effective promotion by the field staff and<br />
extensive publicity about government <strong>for</strong>estry laws.<br />
However, it still persists in the minds of people in<br />
other <strong>part</strong>s of the country. This problem is a major<br />
factor impeding the expansion of planting on<br />
private land.<br />
The government field staff and the local<br />
communities do not relate well due to a lack of<br />
contact. Fiekl visits are rarely made by senior<br />
officers due to time constraints. Another problem<br />
is that the field staff are usually posted in areas<br />
entirely different from their own, and are unaware<br />
of the different social structure and ethnic<br />
conditions of the hills. These problem's mean that<br />
there is very little chance of getting proper<br />
feedback from the farmers. Furthermore, the<br />
government field staff is usually not familiar with<br />
the local MPTS. This makes it unlikely they will<br />
raise seedlings of such <strong>species</strong>, given the lack of<br />
<strong>research</strong> in<strong>for</strong>mation on these <strong>tree</strong>s.<br />
LAC's approach in the field receives more<br />
feedback, making it easier to orient extension<br />
towards farmers' needs. A good example is that<br />
until this year, 1989, Nepalese <strong>for</strong>esters have<br />
recognized only one variety ofFicus semicordata.<br />
Farmers have insisted that there are two distinct<br />
varieties. !ocaliv known as Rai khanyu and Khasru<br />
khanyu. They are actually quite different in their<br />
physical appearance and in phenological<br />
characteristics. Farmers say that Rai khanyu is a<br />
good fodder <strong>tree</strong>, while Khasru khanyu is not.<br />
Khasru khanyu is usually found at lower elevations<br />
113<br />
of the mid-hills (up to 1,400m) whereas Rai<br />
khanyu is found up to 1,800m or sometimes<br />
higher. LAC has always produced Rai khanyu<br />
which is what the farmers want, whereas the<br />
government nurseries have usually produced<br />
Khasru khanyu. Khasru khanyu seeds are<br />
readily available and raising its seedlings is<br />
much easier.<br />
In the same way, farmers have also identified<br />
two varieties of Ficus roxburghii. One is called<br />
Nimaro and is the preferred fodder <strong>for</strong> altitudes<br />
up to 2,000m. The other is called Totne which<br />
grows at lower elevations (up to 1,400m).<br />
Farmers use different production management<br />
systems <strong>for</strong> each type found on their land.<br />
Again, this is a difference not recognized by the<br />
government nurseries.<br />
The LAC approach has had a significant<br />
impact on the number of seedlings produced<br />
and distributed. During the 1988/89 monsoon<br />
342,000 seedlings were produced, 80 percent of<br />
which were MPTS. Of the total seedling<br />
production, 56 percent were distributed<strong>for</strong><br />
planting on private land and the rest went <strong>for</strong><br />
community planting (LAC 1989). This clearly<br />
indicates that private planting in the LAC's<br />
ECA is becoming increasingly popular. This<br />
contrasts with the government's program in<br />
adjacent areas which is almost completely<br />
oriented to communily planting. The<br />
government field staff is unable to produce<br />
MPTS that people want, leading to a lack of<br />
interest in planting on private land. However,<br />
this could change ffbudgetary problems in the<br />
government system were resolved. At the same<br />
time, the focus of the field staff would need to<br />
change towards a mixture of community and<br />
private planting rather than on community<br />
planting alone.<br />
Conclusion<br />
LAC has found that the farmers' own<br />
knowledge can be successfully utilized in an<br />
MPTS extension program. Furthermore, this is<br />
necessary in view of Nepal's need to combat the<br />
over-exploitation of <strong>for</strong>est resources by planting<br />
more MPTS on private land. The present<br />
Government program is'not oriented towards<br />
planting MPTS on priate land. However, th<br />
program potentially could be targeted towards<br />
MPTS extension by adapting their field<br />
activities, with training to modify the field stiff's<br />
attitudes.