multipurpose tree species research for small farms: strategies ... - part
multipurpose tree species research for small farms: strategies ... - part
multipurpose tree species research for small farms: strategies ... - part
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
The strength of the concept is that the physical<br />
environment is comprehensively described,<br />
discussing more than soils or land units. It places<br />
the <strong>research</strong>er in atposition to examine integral<br />
aspects of the environment and how they influence<br />
farmers' decisions. The <strong>research</strong>er isable to<br />
model the interactions between the environment,<br />
the farming practice and the impact of the<br />
technology. Agroecosystems are units of broad<br />
agroecosystem zones that use soils, climate,<br />
geomorphology and topography to identify and<br />
delineate subcomponents. The agroecosystem<br />
approach allows the <strong>research</strong>er to identify specific<br />
technologies <strong>for</strong> the subcomponents of the<br />
agroecosystem zone.<br />
Farming Systems Research and Development<br />
FSRD involves the detailed examination of the<br />
farm. The concept is best summarized by Shaner<br />
et al. (1982:13),<br />
as an approach to agricultural <strong>research</strong> and<br />
development that views the whole farm as a<br />
system; and focuses on the interdependencics<br />
between the components under the control of<br />
members of the farm household and how these<br />
components interact with the physical,<br />
biological, and socioeconomic factors not under<br />
the household's control. Farming systems are<br />
defined by their physical, biological, and<br />
socioeconomic setting and by t]e farm families'<br />
goals and other attributes, access to resources,<br />
choices of productive activities (enterprises)<br />
and management practices.<br />
Comprehensive reviews on FSRD<br />
methodologies provide the foundation <strong>for</strong><br />
understanding the technique (Shaner et al. 1982;<br />
Remenyi 1985; Hildebrand 1986; Collinson 1987;<br />
CIMMYT !988). The system provides a sound<br />
basis <strong>for</strong> analyzing the economic rationale to<br />
explain why a farmer makes a <strong>part</strong>icular decision,<br />
The detailed economic analyses that accompany<br />
FSRD allow <strong>research</strong>ers to identify areas where<br />
<strong>research</strong> could be directed through er-ante<br />
analysis. The economic studies coupled with a<br />
familiarity of the biological components of the<br />
system can quickly allow <strong>research</strong>ers to develop<br />
practical <strong>research</strong> programs. An important aspect<br />
of FSRD is that it is multidisciplinary where<br />
scientists operate as a team. This allows the group<br />
to examine the wide range of components that<br />
make up the average farming system.<br />
Diagnosis and Design<br />
D & D orients the <strong>research</strong> program towards<br />
fully understanding where MPTS can be<br />
126<br />
incbrporated into the farming system. D & D<br />
arose out of the International Council <strong>for</strong><br />
Research in Agro<strong>for</strong>estry's (ICRAF) necd to<br />
focus on the potential of agro<strong>for</strong>estry in the<br />
farming system. Rain<strong>tree</strong> (1987a; 1987b)<br />
discusses the methodology in detail as "a<br />
methodology <strong>for</strong> the diagnosis of land<br />
management problems and design of<br />
agro<strong>for</strong>estry solutions." The key features of D &<br />
D are flexibility, speed and repetition.<br />
The main advantage islinking agro<strong>for</strong>estry<br />
to the farming system. Care isneeded to avoid a<br />
bias towards <strong>tree</strong> crops in the system, compared<br />
to other options the farmer may pursue. The<br />
er-anteapproach isintended to ensure that<br />
<strong>research</strong>ers place all options in their proper<br />
perspective.<br />
Farmer First and Last<br />
The end user must be consulted throughout<br />
the whole <strong>research</strong> and development (R & D)<br />
process. Without consulting the farmer the<br />
above methodologies will lead to <strong>research</strong>er<br />
bias. Chambers (1983) and Chambers and<br />
Ghildyal (1985) have made <strong>research</strong>ers aware of<br />
the need to involve farmers in the R & D<br />
process. Resource rich farmers may be more<br />
responsive to the <strong>research</strong>er's program but the<br />
needs of the <strong>small</strong>-scale, resource poor farmers<br />
must be the focus of the <strong>research</strong>.<br />
Farmers involved in the <strong>research</strong> program<br />
will provide essential feedback to the <strong>research</strong>er<br />
about the interaction of the introduced<br />
technology with the farmer's other activities,<br />
and what un<strong>for</strong>eseen benefits the system may be<br />
providing. In the initial stages of a <strong>research</strong><br />
program to evaluate the use of <strong>tree</strong> legumes to<br />
icrease soil fertility and animal production in<br />
NTT, farmers advised the <strong>research</strong>ers that the<br />
greatest benefit they saw in the system was the<br />
reduced weed buildup. This was more<br />
important to them than the need to increase soil<br />
fetility,which was not immediately apparent.<br />
This resulted in a redirection of the <strong>research</strong><br />
program to use the <strong>tree</strong> crops to reduce weed<br />
competition in the garden.<br />
Case Studv<br />
Incorporating MPTS into the Farming Systems<br />
in NTT<br />
NTT islocated in the Lesser Sunda Islands<br />
of eastern Indonesia. The province consists of<br />
the islands of Flores, Sumba, Alor and the