12.07.2015 Views

2011 report to congress - U.S.-China Economic and Security Review ...

2011 report to congress - U.S.-China Economic and Security Review ...

2011 report to congress - U.S.-China Economic and Security Review ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOBSECTION 2: CHINA’S ‘‘AREA CONTROLMILITARY STRATEGY’’IntroductionDuring the <strong>2011</strong> <strong>report</strong> cycle, the Commission examined <strong>China</strong>’smilitary strategy. At its core, this strategy provides guidance <strong>to</strong> thePeople’s Liberation Army (PLA) on how <strong>to</strong> defeat a technologicallysuperior opponent <strong>and</strong> can be summarized as having three themes.First, it emphasizes degrading an opponent’s technological advancesin an effort <strong>to</strong> level the playing field. Second, it is a militarystrategy that prioritizes striking first in a conflict <strong>to</strong> seize the initiative.Third, its geographic focus centers on controlling <strong>China</strong>’speriphery, especially the western Pacific Ocean. Over the past decade,these themes have been reflected in <strong>China</strong>’s military modernizationefforts. As a result, it appears that the PLA is acquiringimproved capacities <strong>to</strong> counter U.S. military capabilities <strong>and</strong> exploitU.S. military weaknesses. Furthermore, because the focus of<strong>China</strong>’s military strategy has exp<strong>and</strong>ed beyond just a Taiwan scenario,it increasingly impacts <strong>China</strong>’s neighbors, especially those inthe western Pacific Ocean. Finally, the strategy’s emphasis onstriking first opens the door <strong>to</strong> the possibility of miscalculations<strong>and</strong> inadvertent conflict.As a note of clarification, although <strong>China</strong>’s military strategy iscommonly referred <strong>to</strong> as an ‘‘antiaccess’’ or ‘‘area denial’’ strategyin western writings, 157 this Report will refer <strong>to</strong> this strategy as an‘‘Area Control Strategy.’’ Referring <strong>to</strong> <strong>China</strong>’s strategy as an ‘‘antiaccess’’or ‘‘area denial’’ strategy posits an overly U.S.-centric viewpoint,giving the impression that this strategy is intended solely <strong>to</strong>prevent U.S. forces from approaching <strong>China</strong> in the event of a conflict.While deterring, delaying, or denying U.S. forces from operatingalong <strong>China</strong>’s periphery is still a key PLA goal, the Commission’s2009 Annual Report <strong>to</strong> Congress demonstrated that PLA missionshave exp<strong>and</strong>ed. 158 Additional contingencies now include, forexample, the defense of <strong>China</strong>’s disputed terri<strong>to</strong>rial claims in theEast <strong>and</strong> South <strong>China</strong> Seas.* As such, a continued U.S.-centric approachdownplays the point that <strong>China</strong>’s military strategy can bejust as effectively used against other militaries throughout EastAsia. Conventionally armed missiles that can target U.S. bases <strong>and</strong>forces in East Asia can just as easily strike Japanese, Philippine,or even Vietnamese bases <strong>and</strong> forces in the event of a conflict.Summarizing the Commission’s findings from a hearing, factfindingtrips <strong>to</strong> the U.S. Pacific Comm<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> Asia, <strong>and</strong> staff research,this section of the Report describes the PLA’s Area ControlStrategy <strong>and</strong> the implications for the United States <strong>and</strong> East Asia.* For more on recent PLA activities in the South <strong>and</strong> East <strong>China</strong> Seas, see section 1 of thischapter.(182)VerDate Nov 24 2008 13:46 Nov 10, <strong>2011</strong> Jkt 067464 PO 00000 Frm 00194 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6601 G:\GSDD\USCC\<strong>2011</strong>\067464.XXX 067464

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!