04.12.2012 Views

The SRA Symposium - College of Medicine

The SRA Symposium - College of Medicine

The SRA Symposium - College of Medicine

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Papers<br />

Readability vs Comprehension: Grade level recommendations assume that consent forms written at<br />

a 6th- 8th grade level will be more understandable than those written at a college grade level. Unfortunately,<br />

that assumption isn’t supported by the evidence. A 2004 review (Hochhauser, 2004b)<br />

<strong>of</strong> comprehension <strong>of</strong> hard-to-read original documents vs easy-to-read revised documents found<br />

only small improvements in reader understanding, perhaps an improvement <strong>of</strong> about 10%-15%<br />

in understanding. But even that degree <strong>of</strong> improvement was weakened by the way comprehension<br />

was measured. Of the nine studies reviewed, only two addressed the validity and reliability <strong>of</strong> the<br />

comprehension measures. Unless such measures are shown to be both valid and reliable, their reliance<br />

on “face validity” is scientifically meaningless. Equally important is that comprehension was<br />

<strong>of</strong>ten measured by true-false or multiple choice questions. But true-false measures suffer from the<br />

limitation that since there are only two choices, a respondent can get half the answers correct by<br />

guessing; multiple choice questions have a similar problem, ins<strong>of</strong>ar as a question with four choices<br />

can be answered correctly 25% <strong>of</strong> the time by guessing. With such scientifically weak comprehension<br />

measures, the assumption that the recommended 6th- 8th grade consent form will significantly<br />

increase comprehension over a 14th grade consent form remains to be proven.<br />

Writing at a 6th-8th grade level: Even if the recommended goal for a consent form is a 6th-8th<br />

grade reading level, reaching that goal will be difficult, if not impossible. Because readability formulas<br />

calculate grade level based on the average number <strong>of</strong> words in a sentence and the average<br />

number <strong>of</strong> syllables in a word, the only way to get a consent form down to a 6th-8th grade level is<br />

to write shorter sentences with fewer words. Flesch’s Reading Ease score (Flesch, 1949) estimates<br />

that documents written at a 6th-8th grade reading level will average 14-17 words per sentence and<br />

139-147 syllables per 100 words. Given technical language <strong>of</strong> a typical consent form, it’s unlikely—if<br />

not impossible—to write consent forms at that recommended level. Writers can “write to the<br />

formula” (e.g., changing one long sentence into three shorter sentences) but readability researchers<br />

do not recommend that strategy because it <strong>of</strong>ten results in shorter, but choppier sentences that<br />

don’t communicate very well and might not improve comprehension. Paradoxically, consent forms<br />

written at a statistically more “readable” level may not be more “understandable.”<br />

<strong>The</strong> Subject<br />

Understanding informed consent: Because research shows that documents rewritten to lower grade<br />

levels do not improve comprehension very much, it’s crucial to ask what comprehension means<br />

to both researchers and prospective subjects. What researchers communicate isn’t always what’s<br />

understood.<br />

As noted above, consent form comprehension studies show that consent forms written at lower<br />

grade levels don’t improve comprehension very much. But because <strong>of</strong> study limitations, even those<br />

small improvements may not generalize to understanding informed consent in the clinical trial<br />

setting. While those studies that found some improvement in comprehension with consent forms<br />

written at lower grade level, those studies <strong>of</strong>ten used consent forms that were fairly brief, anywhere<br />

from 300 to 1,000 words, while Sharp’s (2004) analysis <strong>of</strong> oncology consent forms found them<br />

to average eleven pages and about 2,700 words. But it may be worse than that. Sharp’s analysis<br />

only included the typical informed consent form—not the newer consent forms that <strong>of</strong>ten include<br />

HIPAA information. Although the FDA does not require HIPAA information to be part <strong>of</strong><br />

the consent form which would require it to be reviewed by the IRB, many sponsors have added<br />

HIPAA information to the consent form instead <strong>of</strong> including it as an addendum—which does not<br />

have to be reviewed by the IRB. Additional HIPAA information can add another 500-900 words<br />

to the consent form, making the typical oncology consent form about 3,500 words long—over ten<br />

times as long as some consent forms in the comprehension studies.<br />

2005 <strong>Symposium</strong> Proceedings Book 107

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!