The SRA Symposium - College of Medicine
The SRA Symposium - College of Medicine
The SRA Symposium - College of Medicine
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
have done. <strong>The</strong>re is no sustained effort to develop indigenous knowledge, despite the availability<br />
<strong>of</strong> this advantage. This is a serious omission since indigenous knowledge is what should secure for<br />
Africa a niche in the globalizing world economy, as is the case with the developing countries <strong>of</strong> the<br />
east.<br />
Because <strong>of</strong> the continent’s low level <strong>of</strong> development <strong>of</strong> science & technology, 54 African countries<br />
are now poorer than they were in 1990 (Hewett 2004:10) despite the fact that some OECD countries<br />
have been moving their R&D operations to the developing world (mainly India, China and<br />
Singapore). Apart from the science and technology infrastructure that these countries have, they<br />
also have the advantage <strong>of</strong> much cheaper labour. For example, South Africa pays US$2.17 per hour<br />
in manufacturing against US 60 cents in India and US 50 cents in China (Mouton 2004:12). <strong>The</strong><br />
challenge for Africa is for it to upgrade its technology intensive products. In fact, India is applying<br />
what it calls its 18th Century technology (meaning indigenous technology) as one <strong>of</strong> the means<br />
<strong>of</strong> attaining its planned economic growth <strong>of</strong> 7-8% <strong>of</strong> its GDP. India’s biotechnology industry is<br />
growing and is expected to compete with that <strong>of</strong> the West very soon. In view <strong>of</strong> India’s success,<br />
Kenyatta University in Kenya has set up a Faculty <strong>of</strong> Traditional <strong>Medicine</strong>. This paper argues that<br />
the development <strong>of</strong> indigenous technology is only possible through a well managed innovation<br />
system which is based on a strong science system, with adequate funding systems. It is recognized,<br />
however, that the region does not have sufficient resources to fund a sustained innovation system,<br />
given that in the US, Heher reports 1 invention disclosure for US$2.5m <strong>of</strong> research expenditure<br />
[or between 20 and 50 papers published] (Heher 2004:11). This paper will use as cases, South<br />
Africa, Zimbabwe, Lesotho and Botswana.<br />
South Africa<br />
Papers<br />
South Africa has historically been the economic hub <strong>of</strong> the region. It is much more developed than<br />
any <strong>of</strong> the SADC countries in all respects, especially in terms <strong>of</strong> the infrastructure for technology<br />
based innovation. <strong>The</strong> country has moved from a situation in the 1980s where its science and technology<br />
institutions were autonomous and unrelated to a position where the country now boasts<br />
the most elaborate S&T infrastructure and the best functional research management system in the<br />
region. In particular, South Africa has a fairly well developed and relatively well funded science<br />
system with tertiary institutions and research councils. It also has a technology and innovation<br />
system which is backed by scientific councils, R&D institutions and an S&T administrative structure<br />
that is championed by the Department (Ministry) <strong>of</strong> Science & Technology which oversees<br />
a number <strong>of</strong> advisory councils on research and innovation. In that country, research and innovation<br />
management is done at different levels <strong>of</strong> the science and technology systems, in the public as<br />
well as the private sector. For example, there is an overarching framework within which all public<br />
S&T endeavours operate, whether in the tertiary institutions, in the public sector or in the private<br />
sector. This is the National Research & Development Strategy which was adopted in 2002, and<br />
through which the government has re-defined the country’s science and technology system as a<br />
national system <strong>of</strong> innovation.<br />
<strong>The</strong>n there is an elaborate structure for promoting and funding innovation. <strong>The</strong> major funding<br />
body for the public tertiary institutions is the government, which gives these institutions a subvention<br />
to cover the greater part <strong>of</strong> their budgets. <strong>The</strong> government specifies that 10% <strong>of</strong> the subvention<br />
it gives is for research. In addition, there are many other ways in which the government funds<br />
not just the science system (i.e. tertiary institutions and research councils) but the technology development<br />
and transfer (or innovation) activities. Central to the government’s effort in this regard<br />
is the National Research Foundation (NRF) which, as an intermediary institution between policy<br />
and research providers, operates different funding schemes as a way <strong>of</strong> implementing the National<br />
Research & Development Strategy. NRF’s funding system is multi-pronged in that it aims to grow<br />
both the country’s science system as well as its innovation, through different funding programmes.<br />
2005 <strong>Symposium</strong> Proceedings Book 165