04.12.2012 Views

The SRA Symposium - College of Medicine

The SRA Symposium - College of Medicine

The SRA Symposium - College of Medicine

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

have done. <strong>The</strong>re is no sustained effort to develop indigenous knowledge, despite the availability<br />

<strong>of</strong> this advantage. This is a serious omission since indigenous knowledge is what should secure for<br />

Africa a niche in the globalizing world economy, as is the case with the developing countries <strong>of</strong> the<br />

east.<br />

Because <strong>of</strong> the continent’s low level <strong>of</strong> development <strong>of</strong> science & technology, 54 African countries<br />

are now poorer than they were in 1990 (Hewett 2004:10) despite the fact that some OECD countries<br />

have been moving their R&D operations to the developing world (mainly India, China and<br />

Singapore). Apart from the science and technology infrastructure that these countries have, they<br />

also have the advantage <strong>of</strong> much cheaper labour. For example, South Africa pays US$2.17 per hour<br />

in manufacturing against US 60 cents in India and US 50 cents in China (Mouton 2004:12). <strong>The</strong><br />

challenge for Africa is for it to upgrade its technology intensive products. In fact, India is applying<br />

what it calls its 18th Century technology (meaning indigenous technology) as one <strong>of</strong> the means<br />

<strong>of</strong> attaining its planned economic growth <strong>of</strong> 7-8% <strong>of</strong> its GDP. India’s biotechnology industry is<br />

growing and is expected to compete with that <strong>of</strong> the West very soon. In view <strong>of</strong> India’s success,<br />

Kenyatta University in Kenya has set up a Faculty <strong>of</strong> Traditional <strong>Medicine</strong>. This paper argues that<br />

the development <strong>of</strong> indigenous technology is only possible through a well managed innovation<br />

system which is based on a strong science system, with adequate funding systems. It is recognized,<br />

however, that the region does not have sufficient resources to fund a sustained innovation system,<br />

given that in the US, Heher reports 1 invention disclosure for US$2.5m <strong>of</strong> research expenditure<br />

[or between 20 and 50 papers published] (Heher 2004:11). This paper will use as cases, South<br />

Africa, Zimbabwe, Lesotho and Botswana.<br />

South Africa<br />

Papers<br />

South Africa has historically been the economic hub <strong>of</strong> the region. It is much more developed than<br />

any <strong>of</strong> the SADC countries in all respects, especially in terms <strong>of</strong> the infrastructure for technology<br />

based innovation. <strong>The</strong> country has moved from a situation in the 1980s where its science and technology<br />

institutions were autonomous and unrelated to a position where the country now boasts<br />

the most elaborate S&T infrastructure and the best functional research management system in the<br />

region. In particular, South Africa has a fairly well developed and relatively well funded science<br />

system with tertiary institutions and research councils. It also has a technology and innovation<br />

system which is backed by scientific councils, R&D institutions and an S&T administrative structure<br />

that is championed by the Department (Ministry) <strong>of</strong> Science & Technology which oversees<br />

a number <strong>of</strong> advisory councils on research and innovation. In that country, research and innovation<br />

management is done at different levels <strong>of</strong> the science and technology systems, in the public as<br />

well as the private sector. For example, there is an overarching framework within which all public<br />

S&T endeavours operate, whether in the tertiary institutions, in the public sector or in the private<br />

sector. This is the National Research & Development Strategy which was adopted in 2002, and<br />

through which the government has re-defined the country’s science and technology system as a<br />

national system <strong>of</strong> innovation.<br />

<strong>The</strong>n there is an elaborate structure for promoting and funding innovation. <strong>The</strong> major funding<br />

body for the public tertiary institutions is the government, which gives these institutions a subvention<br />

to cover the greater part <strong>of</strong> their budgets. <strong>The</strong> government specifies that 10% <strong>of</strong> the subvention<br />

it gives is for research. In addition, there are many other ways in which the government funds<br />

not just the science system (i.e. tertiary institutions and research councils) but the technology development<br />

and transfer (or innovation) activities. Central to the government’s effort in this regard<br />

is the National Research Foundation (NRF) which, as an intermediary institution between policy<br />

and research providers, operates different funding schemes as a way <strong>of</strong> implementing the National<br />

Research & Development Strategy. NRF’s funding system is multi-pronged in that it aims to grow<br />

both the country’s science system as well as its innovation, through different funding programmes.<br />

2005 <strong>Symposium</strong> Proceedings Book 165

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!