The SRA Symposium - College of Medicine
The SRA Symposium - College of Medicine
The SRA Symposium - College of Medicine
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Papers<br />
Integrated Project<br />
Duration – 4 years<br />
Typical costs under an EC FP6 project<br />
Full Cost (FC) Model<br />
Research Euros (€) Demonstration Activities Euros (€)<br />
Principal Principal<br />
Investigator 10% FTE 30,000 Investigator 1% FTE 3,000<br />
Research Research<br />
Assistant (3yrs) 90% FTE 117,450 Assistant 10% FTE 13,050<br />
Technician 50% FTE 69,000 Consumables 50,000<br />
Consumables 10,000<br />
Travel 18,000<br />
Equipment Purchase 6,000<br />
Equipment access 5,000<br />
Sub total 295,450a Sub total 26,050a<br />
Overheads Overheads<br />
(indirect costs/F&A) (indirect costs/F&A)<br />
@ actual rate <strong>of</strong> 90% 265,905b @ actual rate <strong>of</strong> 90% 23,445b<br />
Total 561,355 Total 49,495<br />
EC funds 50% for Research 280,677.50c EC funds 35% for Demonstration 17,323.25c<br />
Training activities Euros (€) Management Activities Euros (€)<br />
Principal Principal<br />
Investigator 5% FTE 15,000 Investigator 1%FTE 3,000<br />
Examiners 5,000 Administration 6,000<br />
Audit Certification 8,000*<br />
Sub total 20,000a Sub total 17,000a<br />
Overheads Overheads<br />
(indirect costs/F&A) (indirect costs/F&A)<br />
@ actual rate <strong>of</strong> 90% 18,000b @ actual rate <strong>of</strong> 90% 8,100b<br />
[*8,000 excluded as a subcontract cost]<br />
Total 38,000 Total 25,100<br />
EC funds 100% for Training 38,000c EC funds 100% for Management 25,100c<br />
Actual Total Direct Cost <strong>of</strong> the Project [total <strong>of</strong> a] (€) 358,500<br />
Actual Total Indirect Cost (F&A) is 90% <strong>of</strong> Actual Total Direct Cost (€) 322,650<br />
Actual Total Cost <strong>of</strong> the Project (Direct + Indirect/F&A) (€) 681,150<br />
Total Indirect Costs (F&A) that can be claimed under the<br />
FC cost model (I.e. Actual Indirect Cost <strong>of</strong> 90% - Subcontract costs) [total <strong>of</strong> b] (€) 315,450<br />
Total funding paid by the EC for activity type [total <strong>of</strong> c] (€) 361,100.75<br />
Match funding required [Actual Total Cost <strong>of</strong> Project – EC Funding (c)] (€) 320,049.25<br />
Match funding required as a percentage <strong>of</strong> Actual Total Cost <strong>of</strong> Project 47%<br />
* please note that overheads (indirects/F&A) are not payable on subcontracts, including Audit<br />
Certificates.<br />
This comparison <strong>of</strong> EC costing models shows that the FC model is the one to favour, as it provides the<br />
higher net financial return between the two costing models. It is also the default model. Under the FC model<br />
you are able to negotiate your institutional cost rate (F&A) with the EC, as long as you are able to demonstrate<br />
and account for these costs in your financial accounting system by project. If you are unable to do so,<br />
you are only left with the FCF option, whereby your University or Non-pr<strong>of</strong>it will have to accept the arbitrary<br />
“indirect flat rate cost” <strong>of</strong> 20%, which will be significantly lower than your actual indirect cost rate base<br />
(F&A). A University and Non-pr<strong>of</strong>it that is using the FCF costing methodology can move to a FC model as<br />
soon as they are able to demonstrate the required financial accounting criteria. <strong>The</strong> rationale as to why the<br />
EC only pays 50% towards research is because the EC<br />
176 2005 <strong>Symposium</strong> Proceedings Book