04.12.2012 Views

The SRA Symposium - College of Medicine

The SRA Symposium - College of Medicine

The SRA Symposium - College of Medicine

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Papers<br />

a historically black university.<br />

Table 2: Mentoring for Grant Funding - Examples <strong>of</strong> Specific Activities<br />

• Information about grant opportunities<br />

• Finding and providing copies <strong>of</strong> successful grants<br />

• Planning or strategy meetings<br />

• Providing written information about the institution and/or institutional<br />

resources<br />

• Nuts and bolts <strong>of</strong> grants: biosketches, other support, letters <strong>of</strong> support<br />

• Assistance with budget preparation<br />

• Review, comments, editing<br />

<strong>The</strong>se programs have provided a nidus for junior investigators in translational and patient-oriented<br />

research and a forum within which mentoring by research administrators is taking place<br />

through a variety <strong>of</strong> activities including seminars, formal presentations, and one-on-one mentoring.<br />

Table 2 lists some <strong>of</strong> the specific one-on-one mentoring activities that take place between<br />

research administrators and junior faculty that facilitate obtaining grant funding.<br />

To evaluate the benefits <strong>of</strong> these services, we have conducted two assessments. <strong>The</strong> first was a<br />

qualitative evaluation in which we asked junior faculty open-ended questions about the “benefits<br />

<strong>of</strong> collaborative efforts between research administrators and junior faculty.” <strong>The</strong> second evaluation<br />

consisted <strong>of</strong> a survey that asked junior faculty to score the importance <strong>of</strong> listed services for preparing<br />

a grant.<br />

Qualitative Evaluation <strong>of</strong> the Role <strong>of</strong> Research Administrators in Mentoring Junior Faculty<br />

Written responses to an open-ended question identified many <strong>of</strong> the activities listed in Table 2 but<br />

each individual respondent focused on just a subset.<br />

“Working with [the Research Administrator] was fundamental in that she has a deep understanding<br />

<strong>of</strong> several aspects <strong>of</strong> grantsmanship that are not frequently communicated by my research<br />

peers and mentors. First, she provided me with information on funding opportunities that would<br />

be most appropriate for my research interests and phase <strong>of</strong> my career. A second factor was her<br />

knowledge on how I should structure the grant text to meet reviewers’ expectations. Above all,<br />

she was able to simplify the concepts I was trying to explain in my proposal. And last, our weekly<br />

meetings determined the pace at which I progressed towards completion. Having deadlines makes<br />

all the difference and gives you a sense <strong>of</strong> accomplishment.” – RP<br />

“When talking about mentoring, most people think automatically about the pr<strong>of</strong>essional and<br />

scientific guidance a new faculty person needs in order to get started on the right track. But my<br />

academic mentor, [Dr X], knew that in addition, I needed to learn more about the process <strong>of</strong> how<br />

to write grants. She encouraged me to seek guidance from our budget and grants <strong>of</strong>fice, where I<br />

was fortunate to wind up working with [Ms Y]. [She] provided access to a wealth <strong>of</strong> information I<br />

had previously been unaware <strong>of</strong>, and also suggested other people on campus and at the NIH who<br />

could be helpful to me. She helped me to organize and prioritize tasks that needed to be completed<br />

prior to grants submission, provided some gentle accountability for the most onerous tasks, and<br />

even read the grant and provided feedback prior to submission. I still remember the first time I<br />

met with [Ms Y]. My comment was, ‘the next deadline is June 1 and I’m not sure I can make it.’<br />

[Ms Y’s] comment was, “Of course you can, and here’s how.” Leaving her <strong>of</strong>fice after our initial<br />

meeting, I was convinced for the first time that I really would be able to get it done.<br />

190 2005 <strong>Symposium</strong> Proceedings Book

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!