- Page 1: 2005 Symposium Proceedings The SRA
- Page 7: Dear Colleagues and Friends, Octobe
- Page 10 and 11: Table of Contents Karen M. Wilson.
- Page 13: Poster Abstracts
- Page 16 and 17: Poster Abstracts Poster Abstract 20
- Page 18 and 19: Poster Abstracts Poster Abstract 20
- Page 20 and 21: Poster Abstracts Poster Abstract 20
- Page 22 and 23: Poster Abstracts Poster Abstract 20
- Page 24 and 25: Poster Abstracts Poster Abstract 20
- Page 26 and 27: Poster Abstracts Poster Abstract 20
- Page 28 and 29: Poster Abstracts Poster Abstract 20
- Page 30 and 31: Poster Abstracts Poster Abstract 20
- Page 32 and 33: Poster Abstracts Contributed Poster
- Page 34 and 35: Poster Abstracts Poster Abstract 20
- Page 37: Papers
- Page 40 and 41: Papers The principles of respect fo
- Page 42 and 43: Papers The narrative approach, on t
- Page 44 and 45: Papers References Agre, P., Campbel
- Page 48 and 49: Papers Introduction Day by day soci
- Page 50 and 51: Papers Brent: Karl has been a great
- Page 52 and 53: Papers Karl: During my time at the
- Page 54 and 55: Papers Work Hard. Another very impo
- Page 56 and 57: Papers External Resource Acquisitio
- Page 58 and 59: Papers Generally speaking, fundrais
- Page 60 and 61: Papers Organizations and websites t
- Page 62 and 63: Papers Public HBCUs and smaller chu
- Page 64 and 65: Papers There are key databases avai
- Page 66 and 67: Papers 2. Basic Institutional Compo
- Page 68 and 69: Papers The Utility of Gender, Race,
- Page 70 and 71: Papers As a three hospital health c
- Page 72 and 73: Papers References Amdur, R., Banker
- Page 74 and 75: Papers • Dramatic Growth in Resea
- Page 76 and 77: Papers • Cross Unit Collaboration
- Page 78 and 79: Papers The Development, Implementat
- Page 80 and 81: Papers Background: IRBs in AMCs hav
- Page 82 and 83: Papers Institutional Quality Improv
- Page 84 and 85: Papers Institutional Audit Findings
- Page 86 and 87: Papers References: Burke, G.S. (200
- Page 88 and 89: Papers Table 1 Total Number of Prot
- Page 90 and 91: Papers Sunday, December 7, 2003. D
- Page 92 and 93: Papers Similarly, the OGE audit ind
- Page 94 and 95: Papers Changes to 5 C.F.R. §5501.1
- Page 96 and 97:
Papers * * * However, § 5501.106(c
- Page 98 and 99:
Papers 4. Conclusion The NIH Februa
- Page 100 and 101:
Papers Within the context of a mana
- Page 102 and 103:
Papers As illustrated (Figure 1) th
- Page 104 and 105:
Papers Figure 3. Recommendation lev
- Page 106 and 107:
Papers References Australian Vice-C
- Page 108 and 109:
Papers The Problem and Its Statemen
- Page 110 and 111:
Papers ated directly or indirectly
- Page 112 and 113:
Papers Table 1: Survey Respondents
- Page 114 and 115:
Papers Conclusions With the creatio
- Page 116 and 117:
Papers APPENDIX 2 I. Research Admin
- Page 118 and 119:
Papers facing patients being recrui
- Page 120 and 121:
Papers Even if prospective subjects
- Page 122 and 123:
Papers sponsors must have some idea
- Page 124 and 125:
Papers 4) Heuristics: Since the con
- Page 126 and 127:
Papers Hochhauser, M. Informed Cons
- Page 128 and 129:
Papers How “readable” are conse
- Page 130 and 131:
Papers of vowels per word, some on
- Page 132 and 133:
Papers followed by 39 side effect b
- Page 134 and 135:
Papers References Chall, J.S. & Dal
- Page 136 and 137:
Papers Coping involves the effort t
- Page 138 and 139:
Papers Conclusion Defense mechanism
- Page 140 and 141:
Papers of Pennsylvania in 2000. In
- Page 142 and 143:
Papers for board members, reviewing
- Page 144 and 145:
Papers Focusing on “Development
- Page 146 and 147:
Papers Figure 1: Total UB Internal
- Page 148 and 149:
Papers Figure 3: Academic staff vie
- Page 150 and 151:
Papers Respondents’ evaluations o
- Page 152 and 153:
Papers 140 2005 Symposium Proceedin
- Page 154 and 155:
Papers ing proposals, the greater t
- Page 156 and 157:
Papers Abstract “Best Practices
- Page 158 and 159:
Papers INSTITUTIONAL ERA PLANNING A
- Page 160 and 161:
Papers process than an end product;
- Page 162 and 163:
Papers realization of the benefits
- Page 164 and 165:
Papers State and private institutio
- Page 166 and 167:
Papers Institutions of higher educa
- Page 168 and 169:
Papers Typically, all interactions
- Page 170 and 171:
Papers Figure 2 There are nine pers
- Page 172 and 173:
Papers Questions that can be discus
- Page 174 and 175:
Papers Using the innovation success
- Page 176 and 177:
Papers students in non-science subj
- Page 178 and 179:
Papers For example, to address inno
- Page 180 and 181:
Papers The second is the Botswana T
- Page 182 and 183:
Papers manpower is not trained, and
- Page 184 and 185:
Papers European and Federal Funding
- Page 186 and 187:
Papers As the majority of US Univer
- Page 188 and 189:
Papers Integrated Project Duration
- Page 190 and 191:
Papers up to these terms (called
- Page 192 and 193:
Papers Collective responsibility -
- Page 194 and 195:
Papers • Revised implementation p
- Page 196 and 197:
Papers Conclusion SRA is an interna
- Page 198 and 199:
Papers Virgin Territory: The Role o
- Page 200 and 201:
Papers and in which disciplines. Th
- Page 202 and 203:
Papers a historically black univers
- Page 204 and 205:
Papers Benefits of Working with Jun
- Page 206 and 207:
Papers Human Subjects Research and
- Page 208 and 209:
Papers observational and could do v
- Page 210 and 211:
Papers ted on patients at l’Hopit
- Page 212 and 213:
Papers The pastor of the Bergen hos
- Page 214 and 215:
Papers it was at any rate an imposs
- Page 216 and 217:
Papers The Environmental Protection
- Page 218 and 219:
Papers of the restriction on the he
- Page 220 and 221:
Papers Mentoring and Motivating: Br
- Page 222 and 223:
Papers more importantly, individual
- Page 224 and 225:
Papers with little or no cash outla
- Page 226 and 227:
Papers better outcomes for areas th
- Page 228 and 229:
Papers attention of the research of
- Page 230 and 231:
Papers discussion of each prepropos
- Page 232 and 233:
Papers Appendix A Sample Feedback N
- Page 234 and 235:
Papers Introduction Certification p
- Page 236 and 237:
Papers The list of certified resear
- Page 238 and 239:
Papers Research Question 2 What is
- Page 240 and 241:
Papers 8. Twenty-nine percent (29%)
- Page 242 and 243:
Papers individuals outside their or
- Page 244 and 245:
Papers References Bratton, B. & Hil
- Page 246 and 247:
Papers Never let your sense of mora
- Page 248 and 249:
Papers Lakoff (2002) describes inte
- Page 250 and 251:
Papers place blame at the feet of i
- Page 252 and 253:
Papers Lower, G. (2005, June 27). W
- Page 254 and 255:
Papers Institute of Ecosystem Studi
- Page 256 and 257:
Papers • Collaborative research p
- Page 258 and 259:
Papers How Administrators Can Help
- Page 260 and 261:
Papers How to Develop a Centralized
- Page 262 and 263:
Papers The current trend of selecti
- Page 264 and 265:
Papers References Kaiser Daily Heal
- Page 266 and 267:
Papers 254 2005 Symposium Proceedin
- Page 268 and 269:
Papers 256 2005 Symposium Proceedin
- Page 270 and 271:
Papers Evaluation of Strategies for
- Page 272 and 273:
Papers on research activity; manage
- Page 274 and 275:
Papers 4. Introduction of encourage
- Page 276 and 277:
Papers Table 1 Research Attitudes -
- Page 278 and 279:
Papers Constraints When staff were
- Page 280 and 281:
Papers Houston, D. & Studman, C.J.,
- Page 282 and 283:
Papers to look at the technologies
- Page 284 and 285:
Papers areas of responsibilities. T
- Page 287:
Symposium Future Proposals
- Page 290 and 291:
Symposium Future Proposals Symposiu
- Page 292 and 293:
Symposium Future Proposals Symposiu