The SRA Symposium - College of Medicine
The SRA Symposium - College of Medicine
The SRA Symposium - College of Medicine
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Papers<br />
• Revised implementation plan – to inform the EC <strong>of</strong> any deviation from the original proposal.<br />
This must be completed before the deviation is made to avoid any abatement <strong>of</strong> future financial<br />
claims.<br />
• Revised Joint programmes <strong>of</strong> activity – to inform the EC <strong>of</strong> the redistribution <strong>of</strong> workload in<br />
production <strong>of</strong> the revised implementation plan.<br />
• Plan for using and disseminating the knowledge.<br />
• Science and society reporting questionnaire.<br />
• Reporting on the implementation <strong>of</strong> the gender action plan (only for Integrated Projects (IPs)<br />
and Networks <strong>of</strong> Excellence (NoEs)).<br />
• Questionnaire on workforce statistics (for all projects except IPs and NOEs).<br />
• Socio-economic reporting questionnaire.<br />
<strong>The</strong> frequency <strong>of</strong> these reports will be specified in the contract but will be a multiple <strong>of</strong> 6 months,<br />
most commonly at 12 or 18-month intervals. This is unlike US reports which will be required no<br />
more frequently than quarterly and at least annually.<br />
Financial Management<br />
<strong>The</strong> project Consortium management budget must be used to meet the cost <strong>of</strong> audit certification,<br />
the cost <strong>of</strong> calls for proposals, obtaining any financial security such as bank guarantees when<br />
requested by the EC, and any other management activities at the Consortium level not covered<br />
by any other activity (such as coordination <strong>of</strong> intellectual property management and promotion<br />
<strong>of</strong> gender equality within the project). This budget heading is limited to 7% <strong>of</strong> total budget for the<br />
project. Any <strong>of</strong> these management costs in excess <strong>of</strong> each <strong>of</strong> the participating partner’s negotiated<br />
share <strong>of</strong> the management budget will be regarded as non-eligible.<br />
<strong>The</strong> EC regards all identifiable indirect taxes, including sales tax or import duties, as non-eligible<br />
costs, so your systems must be able to separate out these elements <strong>of</strong> indirect taxes from the eligible<br />
expenditure items to which they relate.<br />
Timesheets<br />
<strong>The</strong> US effort-reporting requirement is to monitor the percentage level <strong>of</strong> activity and the percentage<br />
contribution <strong>of</strong> capped salary costs. <strong>The</strong> EC effort-reporting requirement is to monitor the<br />
whole-time hours <strong>of</strong> effort for individuals involved with the project. Percentages are not acceptable<br />
as these hours are then converted using a standard rate into person months. This evidence is<br />
required irrespective <strong>of</strong> whether or not the EC is requested to pay some or all <strong>of</strong> the salary costs<br />
relating to this involvement.<br />
Audit<br />
Within EC Framework 6, and it is likely Framework 7, more emphasis is being placed on the<br />
responsibility <strong>of</strong> the University or Non-pr<strong>of</strong>it to evidence the accuracy <strong>of</strong> the cost statements<br />
submitted than in previous funding rounds. <strong>The</strong> release <strong>of</strong> the next block <strong>of</strong> cash funds will not<br />
be made unless the necessary audit certification has been received. Unlike the US value threshold<br />
<strong>of</strong> $500k triggering the need for audit certification, in EC funding such certification is required to<br />
accompany the periodic cost statement submitted irrespective <strong>of</strong> the value <strong>of</strong> award. Only in cases<br />
where no cost statement is due within an annual reporting period, but the financial contribution<br />
is in excess <strong>of</strong> Euro 750k (with one certificate required per partner in receipt <strong>of</strong> amounts above<br />
this limit during the period), is the value <strong>of</strong> the award relevant. <strong>The</strong> audit certification is similar<br />
for both EC and US funding and is deemed to be an “independent” certification as the audit firm<br />
selected are independent <strong>of</strong> both the University/Non-pr<strong>of</strong>it and <strong>of</strong> the funder. A special Clause<br />
39 has been recently added to provide organisations in receipt <strong>of</strong> less than Euro150k exemption<br />
182 2005 <strong>Symposium</strong> Proceedings Book