04.12.2012 Views

The SRA Symposium - College of Medicine

The SRA Symposium - College of Medicine

The SRA Symposium - College of Medicine

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Poster Abstract<br />

2005 <strong>Symposium</strong><br />

Annual Meeting <strong>of</strong> the Society <strong>of</strong> Research Administrators International<br />

Milwaukee, WI<br />

October 16-19, 2005<br />

Principal Author: Martha F. Nelson, RN MS MPA<br />

Author Affiliation: Office <strong>of</strong> Clinical Trials<br />

United Health Services Hospitals, Inc.<br />

Author Email: Martha_Nelson@uhs.org<br />

Author Address: 33-57 Harrison Street<br />

Johnson City, NY 13790<br />

USA<br />

Secondary Authors: none<br />

Title: Performance Evaluation Metrics for Research Administrators<br />

Abstract:<br />

Poster Abstracts<br />

With current brouhaha over lapses in accountability and responsibility among industry leaders,<br />

performance management is becoming a strategic imperative for organizations. Some organizations<br />

have led by developing clear policies, firm controls and commitment to excellence. In developing<br />

that culture, an organization needs to define specific targets using measurable tools, allocate<br />

resources, and connect processes with its core values and principles. <strong>The</strong> Campaign for Excellence<br />

(C4E) celebrating its third year at UHSH identified six key pillars that affect overall performance<br />

<strong>of</strong> employees. Using the pillars People, Service, Quality, Finance, Growth, Community, the author<br />

designed a Leader Evaluation Metrics for performance measurement. Each pillar carries a<br />

weighted value. Goals with concurrent results are scaled 1-5, (1 Poor -5 Excellent). By multiplying<br />

these factors, one gets an average score for that area. Add up scores for each pillar, an overall<br />

performance score is reached where 5.0 is the highest. Devised for self-evaluation, the process is<br />

reported quarterly to senior management. Taking this deliberative approach, the metrics’ form<br />

becomes a formal mechanism to honestly document and report with integrity one’s accomplishments.<br />

Moreover, it presents a locus to reward and recognize achievement which creates an incentive<br />

that enables one to seek exemplary performance.<br />

2005 <strong>Symposium</strong> Proceedings Book 15

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!