The SRA Symposium - College of Medicine
The SRA Symposium - College of Medicine
The SRA Symposium - College of Medicine
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Papers<br />
• Dramatic Growth in Research Volume<br />
<strong>The</strong> University <strong>of</strong> Michigan’s research volume in fiscal year 1994 was $386 million and is projected<br />
to be $804 million in fiscal year 2005. This dramatic growth placed an increasing burden on central<br />
level administrators and led to the increase <strong>of</strong> unit level staff. As the research funding levels<br />
grew, workloads grew, as did individual frustrations.<br />
• Technological Changes<br />
<strong>The</strong> University <strong>of</strong> Michigan has seen significant changes in the use <strong>of</strong> technology and s<strong>of</strong>tware<br />
in managing research and other institutional administrative functions. <strong>The</strong> Internet, a multi-tier<br />
remote computing application database (Peoples<strong>of</strong>t), and electronic grant submissions all have<br />
affected day-to-day grant management. <strong>The</strong>se changes have necessitated the distribution <strong>of</strong> many<br />
central research administration functions to the unit level. This decentralization created a significant<br />
need for training and communication among unit level administrators.<br />
• Regulatory and Compliance Environment<br />
From A21 to human subjects to export controls, the environment <strong>of</strong> sponsored research regulation<br />
has changed dramatically in the last decade. <strong>The</strong> government’s improved ability to track compliance<br />
(enhanced by its own use <strong>of</strong> improved technology) and the addition <strong>of</strong> new regulatory/compliance<br />
requirements has greatly impacted research administration. Research administrators at<br />
all levels need to be more educated about a wider variety <strong>of</strong> regulations and act as educators and<br />
enforcers <strong>of</strong> those requirements close to where the research is being performed.<br />
• Decentralized Operating Environment<br />
<strong>The</strong> University <strong>of</strong> Michigan has a fairly decentralized operating environment for research administration.<br />
At the unit level over 800 staff are involved in the day-to-day administration <strong>of</strong> research.<br />
According to Jim Randolph, the Senior Associate Director <strong>of</strong> the Division for Research Development<br />
and Administration (DRDA), the University’s philosophy for research administration is “to<br />
surround the principal investigators with well-trained unit level administrators who manage the<br />
administrative details and allow the investigator to focus on the science.” <strong>The</strong> central <strong>of</strong>fices: Office<br />
<strong>of</strong> the Vice President for Research (OVPR); Division for Research Development and Administration<br />
(DRDA); and Financial Operations, Sponsored Programs Office (SPO) are the focal points for<br />
sponsored projects administration.<br />
<strong>The</strong> Impact <strong>of</strong> Change<br />
<strong>The</strong>se changes created a critical need for education, training, and a pr<strong>of</strong>essional community in<br />
research administration at the University <strong>of</strong> Michigan. Due to the growth <strong>of</strong> research, many people<br />
without grant management experience became involved in research administration. <strong>The</strong>y required<br />
education and training to effectively assume their new roles.<br />
<strong>The</strong> University <strong>of</strong> Michigan’s Response<br />
Senior leadership in OVPR, DRDA, Financial Operations, and several units across campus recognized<br />
the impact <strong>of</strong> the change and decided to take action. <strong>The</strong>y embarked on an integrated strategy<br />
to improve the research administration environment at the University <strong>of</strong> Michigan. This strategy<br />
was comprised <strong>of</strong> four components: 1) creating education and training programs; 2) building a<br />
sense <strong>of</strong> community among research administrators; 3) creating cross functional problem solving<br />
teams to build a more collaborative environment; and 4) developing programs for recognition to<br />
foster pr<strong>of</strong>essional identity.<br />
62 2005 <strong>Symposium</strong> Proceedings Book