04.12.2012 Views

The SRA Symposium - College of Medicine

The SRA Symposium - College of Medicine

The SRA Symposium - College of Medicine

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

In particular, the process <strong>of</strong> searching for, applying for, and managing extramural funding is new<br />

territory for these “grant virgins.” Beyond coming up with interesting and novel science, they must<br />

learn the language <strong>of</strong> sponsored research, with its R01’s, F&A, Fastlane and Commons. <strong>The</strong>y must<br />

also learn business practices, policies and processes for their institution and sponsoring agencies.<br />

Mentoring<br />

Mentoring is the standard method that academic medical centers use to teach junior faculty the<br />

skills they need to be an academic researcher. Mentoring has been much described in the literature,<br />

with many definitions and descriptions <strong>of</strong> responsibilities. While there is some disagreement<br />

about terminology, most <strong>of</strong> the research community agrees that mentoring should involve training<br />

and guidance on technical scientific skills as well as career development issues (Werner 2004,<br />

Connor 2000, Bauchner 2002). Table 1 highlights the most commonly identified responsibilities <strong>of</strong><br />

mentoring.<br />

Table 1: Responsibilities <strong>of</strong> the Mentor<br />

• Developing research skills<br />

• Selecting and conducting research projects<br />

• Conducting research ethically<br />

• Presenting research findings<br />

• Completing and submitting manuscripts<br />

• Guidance on balancing work/home life<br />

• Promoting one’s career<br />

• Networking<br />

• Obtaining research funding<br />

• Listening and problem solving<br />

FN: Bauchner 2002; Pololi 2002, IOM 1997 Mott 2002,<br />

Greggs-McQuilkin 2004, Waugh 2002, Tobin 2004,<br />

Ramanan 2002, Connor 2000, Shea 1995, Mason 2003,<br />

Schrubbe 2004, Waugh 2002,Werner 2004<br />

Papers<br />

Most academic medical centers rely on a traditional mentoring system for junior faculty, where<br />

there is one mentor who trains and guides the mentee. One <strong>of</strong> the drawbacks <strong>of</strong> this model is<br />

inherent to the one-on-one model: the mentee only learns what the mentor knows. <strong>The</strong> mentor’s<br />

experience is based on a sample <strong>of</strong> one – his or her personal experience, which may not always<br />

match the mentee’s needs (Waugh 2002, IOM 1997). Another drawback <strong>of</strong> this model is that the<br />

best mentors are usually highly sought leaders, which means that they have less time to spend with<br />

individual mentees (Pololi 2002, Connor 2000, Bauchner 2002). A major criticism <strong>of</strong> the mentored<br />

learning experience is that the mentor does not have enough time to give adequate attention to the<br />

mentee (Mason 2003, Bauchner 2002, Waugh 2002).<br />

Research Administrators<br />

Research administrators in academic institutions are typically involved in supporting investigators<br />

in the procurement or management <strong>of</strong> research funding. This role may take various forms, from<br />

assisting in budget development to ensuring compliance with sponsor regulations to overseeing<br />

a departmental or institutional portfolio <strong>of</strong> sponsored research funding. <strong>The</strong>re are a few areas<br />

<strong>of</strong> knowledge, however, that are common across many research administrators. <strong>The</strong>se individuals<br />

typically have an in-depth familiarity with the various funding mechanisms and agencies that<br />

sponsor research. <strong>The</strong>y know the project timelines and budgetary implications <strong>of</strong> the funding<br />

mechanisms and which sponsors are more likely to sponsor which kind <strong>of</strong> research. Research administrators<br />

also generally know how the review process works for various funding agencies. <strong>The</strong>y<br />

frequently have access to information about who in the institution is doing what kinds <strong>of</strong> research<br />

2005 <strong>Symposium</strong> Proceedings Book 187

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!