04.12.2012 Views

The SRA Symposium - College of Medicine

The SRA Symposium - College of Medicine

The SRA Symposium - College of Medicine

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Many institutions are focusing on increasing external funding, either through gifts, and/or grants<br />

and contracts. <strong>The</strong> sponsored programs <strong>of</strong>fice cannot increase the number and dollar <strong>of</strong> grants and<br />

contracts simply by requesting our faculty and staff increase their submissions. Instead, we must<br />

familiarize ourselves with the strengths and weaknesses <strong>of</strong> our institutions; develop collaborations<br />

and programs focused on those strengths, and strategies for procuring funding to support such<br />

programs.<br />

Challenges for Higher Education in the Twenty-First Century<br />

Papers<br />

<strong>The</strong> downturn in the U.S. economy in 2000 had immediate and far reaching repercussions for<br />

higher education funding. For example, higher education competes for state resources with programs<br />

such as Medicaid, elementary and secondary education, transportation and the department<br />

<strong>of</strong> corrections, to name a few. Because institutions <strong>of</strong> higher education have the capacity to raise<br />

funds through tuition, legislators <strong>of</strong>ten feel that education organizations have more flexibility to<br />

survive than traditional state agencies that are solely reliant on general appropriated funding. For<br />

this reason, in many states, higher education was targeted with a disproportionate share <strong>of</strong> the<br />

budget cuts.<br />

As an example, funding for public institutions in the State <strong>of</strong> Illinois has been declining since<br />

2002. Hebel (2004) reports that funding for Illinois public institutions declined 1.7% in 2004 and<br />

States in the Great Lakes area continue to lag behind the rest <strong>of</strong> the nation in rebounding from the<br />

economic recession in the early 2000s. Additionally, even states whose economies that have begun<br />

rebounding have not returned to pre-2000 funding levels for institutions <strong>of</strong> higher education.<br />

While these funding cuts have certainly made it difficult to manage the daily operations <strong>of</strong> an institution<br />

<strong>of</strong> higher education, the greater challenge is in providing the new programs and services<br />

our society and governments require with these limited resources.<br />

First, the primary challenge to higher education institutions today is in providing access and personalized<br />

service to a larger, further diversified, population <strong>of</strong> students. In 2009, it is projected that<br />

3.2 million students will graduate from high school, the largest class in the country’s history. <strong>The</strong><br />

largest class to graduate previously was in 1977. In 1977, 51% <strong>of</strong> the graduates went on to pursue a<br />

postsecondary education, in 2005, 68% <strong>of</strong> high school graduates enroll in college (Selingo, 2005).<br />

Nontraditional or adult students are returning to university or community college campuses taking<br />

college courses at <strong>of</strong>f-site locations, or enrolling in classes <strong>of</strong>fered through their employer, or enrolling<br />

on-line to receive an additional degree or more training. Adult students need this flexibility. By<br />

the end <strong>of</strong> 2005, 1.2 million college students will be enrolled in college fully online, up from 438,000<br />

in 2002. By 2007, that number is expected to jump to 1.7 million (Selingo, 2005). Tuition costs at<br />

institutions <strong>of</strong> higher education continue to rise, principally because <strong>of</strong> decreasing support from<br />

state governments. This is causing an increasing amount <strong>of</strong> college costs borne by students and<br />

families. Access and affordability for students is being threatened. High academic achievers among<br />

low-income students have limited opportunities to attend college. <strong>The</strong>y are no more likely to attend<br />

college than the lowest performing wealthy students. It is becoming that universities are attracting<br />

principally higher and middle income students and less lower-income students.<br />

A recent survey developed by Chicago Public Schools illuminates the problem <strong>of</strong> low income,<br />

minority students going to college (Cholo, 2005). About a third <strong>of</strong> Chicago Public Schools high<br />

school graduates who planned to attend college did not enroll in the fall semester. <strong>The</strong>re were<br />

18,172 students that graduated from Chicago Public Schools in 2004. <strong>The</strong> percentage <strong>of</strong> 8,741<br />

Black students that attended college was 46%, Latino students numbered 6,198 and 38 % attended,<br />

White students numbered 2,206 with 60.2% attending and 999 Asian students graduated with 76%<br />

attending college.<br />

2005 <strong>Symposium</strong> Proceedings Book 153

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!