08.08.2015 Views

Economic Report of the President

Report - The American Presidency Project

Report - The American Presidency Project

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

sion relatively well. Although substantial losses are being experiencedby many carriers, most analysts consider <strong>the</strong> general condition <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>industry to be sound. Most importantly, substantial investment inmore fuel-efficient aircraft is continuing.Rising energy prices have caused a different problem for railroadderegulation. Federal legislation enacted in 1976 provided <strong>the</strong> railroadswith increased rate flexibility, but this initial dose <strong>of</strong> "deregulation"proved inadequate. In <strong>the</strong> meantime, <strong>the</strong> booming demand forcoal prompted <strong>the</strong> railroads to raise coal-hauling rates sharply. Thesehigher rates reflect <strong>the</strong> need to generate sufficient revenues to financelarge investments in additional coal-hauling capacity, but <strong>the</strong>ymay also reflect some exercise <strong>of</strong> monopoly power. In any case, <strong>the</strong>rapid increase in coal-hauling rates, and <strong>the</strong> fear <strong>of</strong> even more rapidincreases if <strong>the</strong> ICC controls were lifted, caused opponents <strong>of</strong> fur<strong>the</strong>rderegulation to press for continuing ICC surveillance <strong>of</strong> coal-haulingand o<strong>the</strong>r bulk commodity rates. A compromise was reached thatpermitted a relaxation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ICC's rate-approval authority on a prearrangedschedule. The railroads have been given significant freedomto alter rates to meet shifting market conditions, while rail usershave been given some protection against abuse <strong>of</strong> this freedom. Theresult should be better service and <strong>the</strong> substitution <strong>of</strong> coal for oilwhere lower total coal costs (including <strong>the</strong> cost <strong>of</strong> transportation)warrant.Unexpectedly sharp increases in energy prices are not <strong>the</strong> onlyfactor that has complicated regulatory transitions. Any unforeseen alterationin economic conditions can produce tensions. For example,<strong>the</strong> unprecedented swings in interest rates that occurred in 1980placed additional strains on <strong>the</strong> .already complex deregulation process<strong>of</strong> eliminating statutory differences between <strong>the</strong> various types <strong>of</strong>financial institutions.This discussion leads to one conclusion. Inflexible transition pathsare likely to encounter problems, particularly if <strong>the</strong> period precedingderegulation is stretched out to protect <strong>the</strong> economic positions <strong>of</strong>workers, shareholders, or consumers. Flexible transition paths, on<strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand, can allow industries to wea<strong>the</strong>r even large unanticipatedshocks by permitting innovation. Transition paths should<strong>the</strong>refore be made as flexible as possible. Although <strong>the</strong> political difficulties<strong>of</strong> doing so should not.be underestimated, it seems preferableto dismantle <strong>the</strong> regulatory barriers to efficient pricing relativelyquickly and to take separate action to provide compensation for capitallosses or to prevent windfall gains, if necessary.EFFORTS TO IMPROVE THE PROCESS OF SOCIAL REGULATIONWhile much <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> economic regulation placed on <strong>the</strong> statutebooks over <strong>the</strong> years has been eliminated or substantially reduced,102

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!