08.08.2015 Views

Economic Report of the President

Report - The American Presidency Project

Report - The American Presidency Project

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The volume <strong>of</strong> international financing is reflected in Table 32,which describes current-account positions, net <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>ficial transfers,for broad country groupings, as compiled and projected by <strong>the</strong>OECD. The table provides an indication <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> orders <strong>of</strong> magnitudeinvolved, but specific numbers should not be overemphasized sinceeven <strong>the</strong> historical numbers are subject to substantial margins <strong>of</strong>error. The projections for 1981 are particularly uncertain because <strong>the</strong>assumption <strong>of</strong> a constant real oil price that underlies <strong>the</strong>se projectionsis at risk on account <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Iran-Iraq struggle.Very large financing needs will persist over <strong>the</strong> next several years.While <strong>the</strong> OPEC surplus is expected to decline if oil prices do notrise sharply again, <strong>the</strong> decline will be more than matched by a projectedimprovement in <strong>the</strong> current-account positions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> largerOECD countries. The deficits <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> smaller OECD countries willremain roughly unchanged at levels that—while broadly financeable—arenever<strong>the</strong>less viewed as a problem by <strong>the</strong> countries <strong>the</strong>mselves.The already substantial deficits <strong>of</strong> a number <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> non-oil developingcountries are projected to rise fur<strong>the</strong>r, but whe<strong>the</strong>r financingon <strong>the</strong> scale implied by such deficits will be forthcoming mustremain a question <strong>of</strong> serious concern.TABLE 32.—Global current-account balances, exclusive <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>ficial transfers, 1978-81[Billions <strong>of</strong> U.S. dollars; OECD basis]Country 1978 1979 1980' 1981 2OECDOPECBis Seven »O<strong>the</strong>r .. ..Non-oil developing countries..O<strong>the</strong>r «Residual« . . .28355-30%-9%7-132-1570-47-3-47-14-33120-62-6-5-1221%-33%1 Preliminary.* OECD projection.:i United States, Japan, Germany, France, United Kingdom, Italy, and Canada.4 Centrally planned economies, Gibraltar, Malta, South Africa and Yugoslavia.A Reflects statistical errors and asymmetries. Given <strong>the</strong> very large gross flows <strong>of</strong> world balance <strong>of</strong> payments transactions,statistical errors and asymmetries easily give rise to world totals (balances) that are significantly different from zero.Source: Organization for <strong>Economic</strong> Cooperation and Development (OECD).At an aggregate level, <strong>of</strong> course, <strong>the</strong> borrowing needed to financedeficits must be matched by <strong>the</strong> lending that surplus countries undertake.The relative ease, compared to expectations, with which <strong>the</strong>"recycling" <strong>of</strong> funds was carried out after <strong>the</strong> first oil-price shock nodoubt owes a great deal to this "adding-up" property. The sharp increasesin liquidity arising from massive inflows <strong>of</strong> OPEC funds into<strong>the</strong> major national and Eurocurrency banks provided <strong>the</strong> funding for<strong>the</strong> large increase in lending by <strong>the</strong>se banks to <strong>the</strong> deficit countries.86-69-94202

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!