08.08.2015 Views

Economic Report of the President

Report - The American Presidency Project

Report - The American Presidency Project

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

iodic tax reductions will be both feasible and necessary in <strong>the</strong> yearsahead as inflation and economic growth push taxpayers into higherbrackets and raise average effective tax rates.TIPs are novel, and most people are unfamiliar with ei<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> opportunities<strong>the</strong>y present or <strong>the</strong> difficulties <strong>the</strong>y pose. It is <strong>the</strong>reforehighly unlikely that a TIP could take effect in 1981. But itwould be useful for <strong>the</strong> public in general, and <strong>the</strong> Congress in particular,to begin evaluating <strong>the</strong> pros and cons <strong>of</strong> TIPs so that when <strong>the</strong>time comes for <strong>the</strong> next round <strong>of</strong> Federal tax cuts a TIP program willbe seriously considered.INCREASING INVESTMENT, SUPPLY, AND PRODUCTIVITY<strong>Economic</strong> policy must place greater emphasis on supply-orientedmeasures during <strong>the</strong> decade <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 1980s for a number <strong>of</strong> reasons.First, an increase in <strong>the</strong> growth <strong>of</strong> aggregate supply, and especially in<strong>the</strong> growth <strong>of</strong> productivity, can raise <strong>the</strong> growth <strong>of</strong> output and employmentthat is consistent with a steady reduction in inflation.Second, reducing this country's vulnerability to higher oil importbills will require a substantially increased investment in alternativeenergy sources over <strong>the</strong> next 10 years. Finally, even if inflationwere not a problem, a speedup in <strong>the</strong> lagging rate <strong>of</strong> productivitygrowth would be essential to maintain <strong>the</strong> historic advance in ourstandard <strong>of</strong> living.The remainder <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> chapter summarizes what has been happeningto productivity in <strong>the</strong> United States and briefly examines some <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> reasons why <strong>the</strong> rate <strong>of</strong> productivity growth has declined. It alsoexamines <strong>the</strong> need to increase <strong>the</strong> share <strong>of</strong> national resources allocatedto capital formation and <strong>the</strong> Administration's response to thatneed. Finally, it discusses <strong>the</strong> relationship between demand- andsupply-side policies, and suggests how <strong>the</strong>y must be integrated.PRODUCTIVITYAdvances in productivity are <strong>the</strong> foundation <strong>of</strong> advances in ourstandard <strong>of</strong> living. Increases in output per worker lead to increases inreal income. Healthy increases in productivity can free <strong>the</strong> fundsneeded to improve <strong>the</strong> conditions <strong>of</strong> disadvantaged groups whilelessening <strong>the</strong> need for sacrifice elsewhere. Thus, when productivitygrowth declines, <strong>the</strong>se o<strong>the</strong>r advances also are delayed. But expectations<strong>of</strong> a rising living standard persist. They perpetuate demands forreal income gains which can no longer be met and which lead to inflationaryincreases in wages and to growth in government spending.Since <strong>the</strong> mid-1960s, <strong>the</strong> growth rate <strong>of</strong> labor productivity hasbeen declining from its postwar highs. In recent years <strong>the</strong> decline hasbeen so marked as to pose a major challenge to public policy. Be-68

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!