08.08.2015 Views

Economic Report of the President

Report - The American Presidency Project

Report - The American Presidency Project

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

elude government investments in local infrastructure and investmentsubsidies to encourage expanding firms to replace contracting ones.Whatever combination <strong>of</strong> policies is chosen, efforts to cushion <strong>the</strong>shocks <strong>of</strong> adjustment should not <strong>the</strong>mselves discourage adaptation.TABLE 13.—Long-term unemployment as percent <strong>of</strong> labor force, 1973-80YearUnitedStatesGermanyFranceUnitedKingdom19731974 ...1975197619771978197919801 Not available.Note.—Long-term unemployment is defined as 15 weeks or longer for <strong>the</strong> United States, 14 weeks for <strong>the</strong> United Kingdom,and 3 months for France and Germany.Source: Organization for <strong>Economic</strong> Cooperation and Devefopment.0.891.002.632.411.921.341.141.710.430.942.382.402.342.251.92(M1.571.662.643.063.473.724.42n1.221.111.802.733.253.403.350)THE DILEMMA OF INDUSTRIAL POLICYChapter 1 <strong>of</strong> this <strong>Report</strong> and <strong>the</strong> preceding sections <strong>of</strong> this chapterdescribe an economy facing increased pressure to adjust to changingeconomic circumstances in a period <strong>of</strong> restrained growth. The increasein Federal involvement in areas previously considered to be<strong>the</strong> domain <strong>of</strong> private decisionmakers has also been detailed. Therecognition that increased adjustment is needed and that <strong>the</strong> resourcesto smooth <strong>the</strong> path <strong>of</strong> this adjustment are limited, has ledsome to propose an explicit "industrial policy" to guide <strong>the</strong> broadcollection <strong>of</strong> Federal activities affecting individual industries and sectors.These proposals, and <strong>the</strong> conflicting pressures <strong>the</strong>y have created,illustrate <strong>the</strong> dilemma stated at <strong>the</strong> beginning <strong>of</strong> this chapter:Increased Federal involvement in <strong>the</strong> economy carries with it both<strong>the</strong> potential to improve and <strong>the</strong> threat <strong>of</strong> reducing <strong>the</strong> economy'sefficiency and adaptability.The steel industry, for example, faces a major financial burden incomplying with clean air and water mandates. It is also beset withmajor problems <strong>of</strong> economic adjustment because <strong>of</strong> vigorous foreigncompetition, technological evolution, changes in labor and raw materialcosts, and geographic and compositional shifts in <strong>the</strong> demand forsteel. Similarly complex circumstances have been developing in <strong>the</strong>auto sector for several years. In 1980 <strong>the</strong> combination <strong>of</strong> recessionand sharply higher gasoline prices focused public attention on <strong>the</strong>domestic industry's longer term problems <strong>of</strong> coping with foreigncompetition, improving productivity, and retooling to meet <strong>the</strong>127

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!