08.08.2015 Views

Economic Report of the President

Report - The American Presidency Project

Report - The American Presidency Project

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

derground water resources once thought virtually unlimited, shouldnow be priced to more appropriately reflect <strong>the</strong>ir limited availability.FUTURE CAUSES OF RISING FOOD PRICESWhen food prices soared upward in 1973, many economists saw itas a temporary deviation from <strong>the</strong> longer-term trend, and <strong>the</strong> apparentreturn <strong>of</strong> surplus production in 1976-77 helped support thisnotion. But food prices did not fall to <strong>the</strong>ir earlier trend line (Chart6). While exhibiting <strong>the</strong> same increase in variability as commodityprices, food prices remained high relative to o<strong>the</strong>r prices throughout<strong>the</strong> 1970s, and additional price increases are likely for at least <strong>the</strong>first half <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 1980s.The Rising Demand for OutputProjected increases in exports and in <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> grain domesticallyfor animal feed indicate sustained upward pressure on commodityprices for <strong>the</strong> next several years. O<strong>the</strong>r economic forces will placestill more pressure on agricultural resources, particularly cropland.Rising energy prices, for example, are increasing <strong>the</strong> demand for naturalfibers, primarily cotton. High sugar prices and <strong>the</strong> expandinguse <strong>of</strong> sugarcane for ethanol production in Latin America are expectedto double <strong>the</strong> demand in <strong>the</strong> United States for corn as a sweetenerby 1985.But perhaps most important is current energy policy which encourages<strong>the</strong> production <strong>of</strong> alcohol fuels from corn. This policy implies<strong>the</strong> need for an additional 370 million bushels <strong>of</strong> corn and a 5percent increase in corn cropland by <strong>the</strong> end <strong>of</strong> 1982. The ethanolproduced from <strong>the</strong> corn would replace about 60,000 barrels <strong>of</strong> oilper day—about 1 percent <strong>of</strong> U.S. oil imports. O<strong>the</strong>r things beingequal, such an increase in demand would increase <strong>the</strong> season averageprice <strong>of</strong> corn about 10 percent. The high cost <strong>of</strong> producing ethanoland <strong>the</strong> higher corn price, even when <strong>of</strong>fset by <strong>the</strong> value <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ethanolby-products and an increase in export earnings, would meanthat <strong>the</strong> Nation was paying nearly twice <strong>the</strong> present world price foreach barrel <strong>of</strong> foreign oil displaced. The benefits <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> gasohol programmay be substantial and difficult to quantify, but its costs arelarge and its pressures on cropland significant. Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, given<strong>the</strong> incentives already authorized, <strong>the</strong> amount <strong>of</strong> corn required forgasohol could more than double by 1985.Pressures on Farm Input UseBy itself, a growing demand for agricultural products would notnecessarily mean rising real prices. Advances in crop yield and o<strong>the</strong>rproductivity gains throughout much <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> postwar period made itpossible to increase production in line with steadily growing demandwithout bringing high-cost, marginal resources into use. But this is121

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!