08.08.2015 Views

Economic Report of the President

Report - The American Presidency Project

Report - The American Presidency Project

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

increase demand pressures, especially in <strong>the</strong> years immediately followingit. While tax reductions that are effective in raising investmentare essential in a long-term strategy to promote economic growth,business tax cuts, like personal tax cuts, must be designed to fit intoan overall framework <strong>of</strong> fiscal restraint.CONCLUSIONSThis analysis <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> macroeconomic effects <strong>of</strong> Federal tax reductionssuggests several conclusions for <strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong> fiscalpolicy:First, specific investment-oriented tax reductions for business arelikely to increase saving, investment, and productivity by a muchmore significant degree than cuts in personal income taxes.Second, productivity-oriented tax reductions will yield improvementsin <strong>the</strong> inflation rate that are helpful and significant, but still relativelymodest in <strong>the</strong> context <strong>of</strong> a 10 percent underlying inflation rate.Third, <strong>the</strong> supply response, while a critically important feature <strong>of</strong>any tax reduction, will be substantially less than <strong>the</strong> demand response,particularly in <strong>the</strong> short run.Fourth, since reductions in both business and personal taxes will increasedemand faster than supply, <strong>the</strong>y must be designed and carriedout in ways that are consistent with <strong>the</strong> demand restraint needed toreduce inflation.It is sometimes alleged that <strong>the</strong> potentially inflationary effects <strong>of</strong> alarge tax cut can be avoided if <strong>the</strong> Federal Reserve steadfastly pursuesits goal <strong>of</strong> keeping <strong>the</strong> growth <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> monetary aggregateswithin tight targets. But if taxes are reduced while <strong>the</strong> Federal Reservepursues an unchanged monetary policy, aggregate demand willnever<strong>the</strong>less increase, especially in <strong>the</strong> short run. The increase indemand would lead to a rise in interest rates that would dampen <strong>the</strong>increase in aggregate demand but not eliminate it. Additional inflationarypressure would <strong>the</strong>n result.A very large tax cut unaccompanied by <strong>the</strong> necessary spending cutswould lead to both an increase in inflation and a sharp rise in interestrates. Some, and perhaps all, <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> stimulus to investment fromtax reductions would be undone by <strong>the</strong> higher interest rates and <strong>the</strong>greater uncertainty engendered by a new round <strong>of</strong> inflation.Monetary restraint is an absolutely essential element <strong>of</strong> inflationcontrol and reduction. Tax measures focused on increasing supplycan make a significant contribution. But <strong>the</strong>re will be a continuingneed for careful and prudent fiscal policies to restrain demand. Inrecent years <strong>the</strong> Nation has come to appreciate <strong>the</strong> potential value <strong>of</strong>supply-oriented tax policies. In <strong>the</strong> process <strong>of</strong> learning some neededlessons about supply-side economics, however, <strong>the</strong> Nation cannot83

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!