08.08.2015 Views

Economic Report of the President

Report - The American Presidency Project

Report - The American Presidency Project

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

and construction helped to reduce <strong>the</strong> adult male unemployment ratebelow that <strong>of</strong> adult females.Unemployment duration leng<strong>the</strong>ned significantly in 1980. In <strong>the</strong>last quarter <strong>of</strong> 1979, before <strong>the</strong> recession began, 48 percent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>unemployed had been looking for work for less than 5 weeks, andonly 8.5 percent, or 524,000 people, had been without jobs for 27weeks or more. By <strong>the</strong> last quarter <strong>of</strong> 1980 about 1.1 million people,or 14 percent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> unemployed, had been looking for work for 27weeks or more. Many <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se workers were eligible for up to 39weeks <strong>of</strong> unemployment compensation, with additional benefits if<strong>the</strong>ir job loss was due to foreign competition or if <strong>the</strong>ir firms orunions provided supplemental unemployment benefits.During <strong>the</strong> 4 years <strong>of</strong> economic expansion from 1976 to 1979 <strong>the</strong>civilian labor force grew at an average annual rate <strong>of</strong> 2.8 percent.The rise in unemployment during 1980 dampened this growth to 1.3percent. After increasing by about 1 percentage point per yearduring <strong>the</strong> last half <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 1970s, <strong>the</strong> female labor force participationrate grew by about one-half, rising to 51.6 percent in 1980. The malelabor force participation rate <strong>of</strong> 77.4 percent was down slightly over<strong>the</strong> year.PRICE DEVELOPMENTSInflation dominated <strong>the</strong> economic news in 1980 as it did in 1979.The implicit price deflator for GNP rose 10.0 percent over <strong>the</strong> 4quarters <strong>of</strong> 1980, substantially faster than <strong>the</strong> 8.1 percent rate <strong>of</strong> increasein <strong>the</strong> deflator during 1979 (Table 18). The producer priceindex for finished goods increased 11.7 percent from December 1979to December 1980, following a 12.6 percent rise during <strong>the</strong> preceding12 months. For <strong>the</strong> 12 months ending in November 1980, <strong>the</strong>CPI increased 12.6 percent, <strong>the</strong> same as over <strong>the</strong> correspondingperiod in 1979. These measures all reflected energy pricesurges early in <strong>the</strong> year and farm price increases late in <strong>the</strong> year. Themost disappointing news, however, was <strong>the</strong> acceleration in variousprice measures which exclude <strong>the</strong> direct effects <strong>of</strong> such special factorsas energy and food. As explained in Chapter 1, such measures are<strong>of</strong>ten used as a proxy for <strong>the</strong> "underlying" rate <strong>of</strong> inflation. After remainingsurprisingly stable during most <strong>of</strong> 1979 in <strong>the</strong> face <strong>of</strong> verylarge oil-price increases, <strong>the</strong>se measures showed significant increasesin 1980.The spring decline in aggregate demand brought rapid changes in<strong>the</strong> prices <strong>of</strong> certain sensitive industrial commodities. Sharp decreaseswere registered by producer prices <strong>of</strong> nonferrous metals aswell as lumber and wood products. These price reductions had animportant—if temporary—moderating influence on producer pricemeasures. Excluding food and energy, producer prices <strong>of</strong> crude ma-148

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!