08.08.2015 Views

Economic Report of the President

Report - The American Presidency Project

Report - The American Presidency Project

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

given standard, as <strong>the</strong> reward and <strong>the</strong> cost rise, so does <strong>the</strong> reduction<strong>of</strong> wage inflation. Second, <strong>the</strong>re is some trade<strong>of</strong>f between standardand reward. That is, a program with a high standard and a lowreward may cost <strong>the</strong> same as a program with a lower standard andhigher reward. Third, for a given budgetary cost, a low-standard, highrewardcombination tends to be more effective in reducing wageinflation than a high-standard, low-reward combination. The selection<strong>of</strong> that combination may create a problem <strong>of</strong> credibility. A TIP that isrelatively effective in restraining pay increases for a given cost willtend to have lower compliance rates than a program with a higherstandard and lower reward but which has less <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> desired effect oncompensation. This happens because higher standards put morepeople in compliance who do not have to modify <strong>the</strong>ir wage behavior.TABLE 7.—Estimated effects and compliance rates <strong>of</strong> various pay TIPsStandard — Reward(percent)$12 billion budgetary cost: 27 — 2Y27y 2 _ 2V*8 - 2 .$16 billion budgetary cost: 27 - 37y 2 - 2%.8 - 2V 2 .Compliance rate(percent)*50 255 961.854.659.865.3Effect onwage inflation(percentagepoints)-0 9387-.79-1.09-1.01-.911 Percent <strong>of</strong> workers in establishments that have an average pay raise less than or equal to standard.2 Net tax expenditure less reduction in Federal compensation. Federal Government pay increase assumed to comply withstandard—reduced from assumed economy-wide wage increase in absence <strong>of</strong> pay TIP.Source: Council <strong>of</strong> <strong>Economic</strong> Advisers.A TIP should be judged not only on its initial impact, but on itsfull effect over a 2- or 3-year period. A TIP continued for 2 yearswith a reduced pay standard in <strong>the</strong> second year could make a significantcontribution to lowering inflation.PRICE TIPSExperience with incomes policies here and abroad, including <strong>the</strong>pay and price standards, suggests that a pay TIP is easier to administerand likely to cause fewer distortions than a price TIP. Never<strong>the</strong>less,a price TIP may be a necessary complement to a pay TIP becauserestraints on pay alone, even with a reward TIP, might appearinequitable. Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, a price TIP could speed up <strong>the</strong> effect <strong>of</strong> apay TIP by shortening <strong>the</strong> lag between <strong>the</strong> lowering <strong>of</strong> pay increasesand <strong>the</strong>ir effect on price increases.It would be unrealistic to set a single price standard for all firms.Productivity growth among industries varies substantially, as dochanges in <strong>the</strong> prices <strong>of</strong> raw materials and o<strong>the</strong>r costs <strong>of</strong> production.65

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!