08.08.2015 Views

Economic Report of the President

Report - The American Presidency Project

Report - The American Presidency Project

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

some countries, and in <strong>the</strong> United States a more formal incomespolicy has played a role. Wage moderation may also have reflected<strong>the</strong> higher average levels <strong>of</strong> unemployment and associated labormarket slack that prevailed in 1979. In some countries—especiallythose where <strong>the</strong> oil-price shock has been absorbed most rapidly suchas Germany and Japan—wage moderation may reflect an implicitsocial consensus under which unavoidable reductions in real incomesare accepted by wage earners in <strong>the</strong> understanding that <strong>the</strong> distribution<strong>of</strong> income will not <strong>the</strong>reby be shifted to <strong>the</strong>ir disadvantage.Although <strong>the</strong> adjustment to <strong>the</strong> recent runup in oil prices has proceededrelatively smoothly in most countries, it cannot be denied that<strong>the</strong> process is very costly. While <strong>the</strong> increased oil bill due to <strong>the</strong> pricerises <strong>of</strong> 1979-80 amounts to about 2V2 percent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> combined GNP<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> OECD member countries, <strong>the</strong> cost in lost output is muchlarger. Taking into account <strong>the</strong> effects <strong>of</strong> both <strong>the</strong> oil-price rise itselfand <strong>the</strong> restrictive monetary and fiscal policies it called forth, <strong>the</strong>OECD estimates that <strong>the</strong> level <strong>of</strong> GNP in <strong>the</strong> OECD member countriesmay be some 6 percent, or about $500 billion, lower by <strong>the</strong> beginning<strong>of</strong> 1982 than it would have been in <strong>the</strong> absence <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> oilpricerise. While this estimate might be somewhat on <strong>the</strong> high side, itis never<strong>the</strong>less clear that even smooth adjustment cannot preventmajor secondary repercussions.RISKS IN THE OUTLOOKExcluding <strong>the</strong> United States, real GNP in <strong>the</strong> major industrialcountries is projected to rise at about a 2 percent annual rate from<strong>the</strong> second half <strong>of</strong> 1980 to <strong>the</strong> first half <strong>of</strong> 1982—a pace unlikely tobe rapid enough to prevent some fur<strong>the</strong>r increases in unemployment.Inflation rates in <strong>the</strong> industrial countries outside <strong>the</strong> United Statesare projected to slow—averaging about 8.5 percent by <strong>the</strong> first half<strong>of</strong> 1982, as compared to 11 percent in <strong>the</strong> second half <strong>of</strong> 1980.The possibility <strong>of</strong> worse outcomes cannot be dismissed, however.In particular, one cannot be entirely confident that <strong>the</strong> pattern <strong>of</strong>wage moderation will continue, inasmuch as <strong>the</strong> reasons for it are notfully understood. A continuation <strong>of</strong> relatively restrictive monetaryand fiscal policies in most countries is widely viewed as necessary tocontain this risk, but <strong>the</strong>se policies may also slow recovery by morethan is now projected. More critically, <strong>the</strong> situation in <strong>the</strong> oil marketis once again precarious following <strong>the</strong> interruption <strong>of</strong> supplies fromIran and Iraq. A fur<strong>the</strong>r large increase in oil prices in 1981 could undermine<strong>the</strong> still fragile process <strong>of</strong> consolidation and recovery. Thefollowing section addresses this issue in more detail.190

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!