08.08.2015 Views

Economic Report of the President

Report - The American Presidency Project

Report - The American Presidency Project

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Federal budget achieved a surplus. In 1974, when ano<strong>the</strong>r inflationarysurge occurred, <strong>the</strong> deficit was quite small.TABLE 4.—Governmental surplus or deficit and gross national product, 1958-80[Amounts in billions <strong>of</strong> dollars]YearFiscal years—unifiedbudgetFederal surplus ordeficit (-) 1AmountAs percent<strong>of</strong> GNPCalendar years—government sector, national income andproduct accountsFederal surplus ordeficit (-)AmountAs percent<strong>of</strong> GNPFederal and State and localsurplus or deficit (-)AmountAs percent<strong>of</strong> GNP19581959-2.9-12.9-0.7-2.7-10.3-1.1-2.3-.2-12.6-1.6-2.8-.3I960....196119621963...1964...1965...1966....1967....1968 Z1969«..3-3.4-7.1-4.8-5.9-1.6-3.8-8.7-25.23.2.1-.7-1.3-.8-1.0-.2-.5-1.1-3.0.43.0-3.9-4.2.3-3.3.5-1.8-13.2-6.08.4.6-.7-.7.1-.5.1-.2-1.7-.7.93.1-4.3-3 8.7-2.3.5-1.3-14.2-6.09.9.6-.8-.7.1-.4.1-.2-1.8_J 1.019701971....1972.... •••"1973....1974....•••••-2.8-23.0-23.4-14.9-6.1-.3-2.2-2.1-1.2-.4-12.4-22.0-16.8-5.6-11.5-1.2-2.0-1.4-.4-.8-10.6"-19.4-3.37.8-4.7-1.1-1.8-.3.6-.3197519761977...1978..1979-53.2-73.7-53.6-59.2-40.2-3.6-4.5-2.9-2.8-1.7-69.3-53.1-46.4-29.2-14.8-4.5-.3.1-2.4-1.4-.6-63.8-36.5-18.3-.2-11.9-4.1-2.1-1.0.0.51980 \-73.8-2.9-62.3-2.4-34.8-1.3' Includes <strong>of</strong>f-budget outlays.2 A 10-percent income tax surcharge was introduced in July 1968—thus entering calendar year 1968 but fiscal year 1969.3 Preliminary.Sources: Department <strong>of</strong> Commerce (Bureau <strong>of</strong> <strong>Economic</strong> Analysis), Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Treasury, and Office <strong>of</strong> Management andBudget.If government budget deficits are <strong>the</strong> cause <strong>of</strong> inflation, it shouldmake no difference whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> deficit occurs at <strong>the</strong> Federal, State,or local level. For example, <strong>the</strong> Federal revenue-sharing program,which grants Federal tax revenues to State and local governments,has <strong>the</strong> effect <strong>of</strong> reducing State and local deficits (or increasing <strong>the</strong>irsurpluses) by increasing <strong>the</strong> Federal deficit. If <strong>the</strong> program wereeliminated, but both levels <strong>of</strong> government continued to tax <strong>the</strong> sameamount and maintain <strong>the</strong> same level <strong>of</strong> services, <strong>the</strong> Federal deficitwould be reduced—but <strong>the</strong> total deficit, and its inflationary consequences,would be unchanged. In fact, principally because <strong>the</strong> Stateand local governments accumulate funds to pay employee pensioncosts, <strong>the</strong>ir budgets usually show a surplus. As <strong>the</strong> figures in <strong>the</strong> finalcolumn in Table 4 show, <strong>the</strong> combined budgets <strong>of</strong> Federal, State,and local governments have ei<strong>the</strong>r showed a surplus or a very smalldeficit during <strong>the</strong> past two decades, except during recessions and for2 years when Federal spending on <strong>the</strong> Vietnam war was at its peak.41

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!