06.12.2012 Views

aistand south~ern afrkca - (PDF, 101 mb) - USAID

aistand south~ern afrkca - (PDF, 101 mb) - USAID

aistand south~ern afrkca - (PDF, 101 mb) - USAID

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Table 2. ECF reactons in Mal3: UnguJa ECF lmmunisadon<br />

Group<br />

I<br />

Identity of<br />

animal<br />

Days to<br />

uchlzont<br />

Duration<br />

schizont of<br />

(days)<br />

Day to<br />

pyraxla<br />

Duration of<br />

pyrexla<br />

Cause of<br />

death<br />

(days)<br />

Immunised CB5 30<br />

2<br />

CB9 25<br />

CB11 -<br />

CB12 -<br />

CB15 -<br />

CB16 -<br />

CB17 -<br />

CB20 -<br />

CB21 -<br />

CB22 -<br />

CB23 -<br />

CB24 -,<br />

T mutans<br />

Control CB'7 28<br />

Souroe: Raba (98).<br />

C 8 43<br />

CB13 -<br />

CB14 -<br />

CB18 -<br />

(Aher experiences gained<br />

Immunisation against ECF proved effective in<br />

these trials and field immunisation was started<br />

in 1990. Acceptancn by farmers was good, with<br />

about 500 pure-bred Jerseys, Friesians and their<br />

crosses having beeu immunised. However, the<br />

trials have shown that when immunisation<br />

against ECF has been completed other tickborne<br />

diseases are being detected and are a cause<br />

for concern. The most significant tick-borne<br />

disease to surface is babesiosis.<br />

Experience gained has also ohown that<br />

anaemia and low packed cell volume (PCV) can<br />

be a problem in cattle immunised against T<br />

parva. Othey: researchers (Uilenberg, 1984;<br />

Morzaria, 1988) have reported anaemia and<br />

parasitaemia during exposure of ECFimmunised<br />

cattle. The anaemia syndrome has<br />

been associated with high T. mutans<br />

parasitaemia (Rabia, 1989. Poor nutrition has<br />

also been associated with the anaemia syndrome<br />

and parasitaemia (Biw5, 1')91). From this<br />

experience, it has been recommended that only<br />

115<br />

2 ­<br />

3-<br />

- - --<br />

- 225<br />

- 18<br />

- -<br />

- 32<br />

- 17<br />

- -<br />

- - - -<br />

- - - -<br />

- 56<br />

- 15<br />

11 29<br />

2 44<br />

- 15<br />

-<br />

- -<br />

- - - -<br />

1<br />

-<br />

1 ­<br />

1 ­<br />

1 ­<br />

2 ­<br />

9 ECF (38)<br />

1 ­<br />

6 ­<br />

well-nourished cattle should be immunised, with<br />

further studies being conducted on the possible<br />

pathogenicity of T mutans.<br />

The age at which calves should be immunised<br />

is still in debate. While Rabia (1991) rocommended<br />

six months of age as being optimal,<br />

this was in conflict with studies by de Boorder<br />

(1989) who recommended immunisation of much<br />

younger calves, at between one and two months<br />

ofage. Immiunisation at a later age appears to be<br />

more practical where zero-grazing is practised<br />

and early contact with ticks can be controlled.<br />

This situation is rat possible in natural grazing.<br />

On the other hand, passive immunity from the<br />

mother may interfere with immunisation at a<br />

very early age; in addition, the calf may not be<br />

able to develop an effective immune response<br />

because of its immaturity.<br />

Future prospects<br />

Field ECF immunisation has so far been<br />

successful (Dolan, 1992). Five hundred pure and<br />

crossbred cattle have been vaccinated. Farmer<br />

-<br />

-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!