06.12.2012 Views

aistand south~ern afrkca - (PDF, 101 mb) - USAID

aistand south~ern afrkca - (PDF, 101 mb) - USAID

aistand south~ern afrkca - (PDF, 101 mb) - USAID

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

qualified staff at LIC& haa been a cause of<br />

concern for some time now. Out of the 47 LICs<br />

only seven are manned by qualified livestock<br />

assistants (LAs).<br />

The shortage of staff has been caused, in part,<br />

by a perceived lackofopportunities for personnel<br />

career advancement in the department. This is<br />

evidenced by the fact that a few LAs sought and<br />

obtained transfers to other departments of the<br />

ministry. There has also been an alarming staff<br />

turnover throughout the years. The staff<br />

shortagesituatior has probably been aggravated<br />

by the adoption of the International Monetary<br />

Fund-sponsored structural adjustment programmes.<br />

Success has been achieved in t he organisation<br />

of farmers into associations of wool and mohair<br />

growers tf-rough education and persuasion.<br />

Nowvr, the marketing associations are riddl2d<br />

with problems that undermine their very<br />

existence. To illustrate the point: there were<br />

10,484 me<strong>mb</strong>ers of WGA in 1985/86 and 4060<br />

mohair grower association me<strong>mb</strong>ers during the<br />

same period (Hunter, 1987). However, data<br />

obtained for the 1990/91 wool season suggest<br />

thattheme<strong>mb</strong>ershipofWGAhaddeclinedtoless<br />

than half (4932) and that of mohair growers had<br />

increased slightly (4854). The cause for this<br />

apparent disintegration of the associations can<br />

arguably be traced back to the shortage of<br />

advisory staff at the grassroots level. When<br />

farmers do not obtain adequate advice then the<br />

chances for disillusionment and break up of the<br />

groups are high. There exists an urgent need to<br />

fill this gap, as it is more cost effective to work<br />

with organised groups than with individuals.<br />

Success has been achieved in convincing some<br />

farmers to improve their flocks through breeding<br />

with improved rams. However, the character of<br />

land tenure in Lesotho has not helped those<br />

farmers solve their management problems,<br />

Progressive farmers have defined a breeding<br />

season and they actually plan for it but there are<br />

many instances ofewes being impregnated in the<br />

communal range. This has greatly slowed, if not<br />

completely impeded, efforts to improve stock,<br />

Disease control problems, especially aheep<br />

scab can also be blamed on the chaacter of the<br />

land tenire system. Those flocks that have been<br />

dipped graze together with undipped flocks,<br />

rendering the dipping ineffective. The problem is<br />

not confined to sheep scab only, it also includes<br />

internal parasites. A few farmers have taken the<br />

advice of dosing their animals regularly for<br />

internal parasites, but this exercise is futile<br />

given that the animals graze on the same range<br />

as undosed flocks. This probably explains why<br />

only 18% of the sheep and goat owners dosed<br />

their animals according to departmental<br />

recommendations in 1984/85 (Hunter, 1987).<br />

Farmers still attached 'alue to nu<strong>mb</strong>ers rather<br />

than quality and, as a result, the recommended<br />

annual culling of unproductive and off-type<br />

217<br />

animals has not been adhered to by the majority<br />

of farmers.<br />

Land degradation in Lesotho ic thought to be<br />

a result of overstocking and overgrazing. The<br />

management of rangelands is a responsibility ( f<br />

chiefs who historically were effective<br />

administrators. Apparently that effectiveness<br />

has now been undermined (Mlotsamai, 1990) and<br />

negligence has crippled the institution. Many<br />

reasons have been cited as contributing L this<br />

lack of effectiveness. One school of thught<br />

points to the problems facing government in<br />

providing the logistical support and manpower<br />

to enforce regulations. Chiefs, however, have<br />

voiced dissatisfaction with the manrei in which<br />

trespassers are punished by the courts. In many<br />

cases such people are not even brought to justice<br />

and if they are, fines may not be meted out<br />

according to the law. This, coupled with the delay<br />

by courts in administering justice, makes<br />

enforcement of regulations difficult.<br />

Suggested framework for future<br />

development prograrimc<br />

The grazing fee regulation, depending on its<br />

enforcement, will go a long way in improving the<br />

rangeland. Government would do -well to<br />

speedily gazette the regulations for their timely<br />

implementation. The re-adjustment phase in the<br />

initial years could be rough but farmers will<br />

eventually become accustomed to it as they have<br />

to other taxes.<br />

Bocause of the inacoessibility of some areas<br />

by road and, therefore, the , npracticability of<br />

putting up new shearing sheds, the informal<br />

traders wool and mohair "hawkers" (Hunter,<br />

1987) must be revewed. It may be necessary to<br />

re-legalise them to reduce or to completely<br />

out-compete smuggling thereby releasing more<br />

wool fr saic through the formal marketing<br />

channels.<br />

Government shcv:!d effectively work itselfout<br />

of the marketing structures. Some farmers are<br />

known to dislike LPMS because they see theni as<br />

an agency designed to make profit for the<br />

Government. The marketing ofwool and mohair<br />

should be handed over to WMGA9, albeit<br />

gradually, and maintenance of shearing sheds<br />

and payment of staff thereof would effectively<br />

ceade to be the responsibility ofgovrnment.<br />

Synthesis of the development case sudies<br />

Since the early days of Basotho nationhood wool<br />

and mohair have been major sources of income<br />

for rural farmers in many regions of Lesotho,<br />

especially in the remote mountain areas.<br />

Hence government has had to erect<br />

structures for the continued growth and<br />

development potential of Lesotho's most<br />

important export product. The programmes by<br />

necessity had to include policy issues on range<br />

management and small stock production,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!