aistand south~ern afrkca - (PDF, 101 mb) - USAID
aistand south~ern afrkca - (PDF, 101 mb) - USAID
aistand south~ern afrkca - (PDF, 101 mb) - USAID
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
qualified staff at LIC& haa been a cause of<br />
concern for some time now. Out of the 47 LICs<br />
only seven are manned by qualified livestock<br />
assistants (LAs).<br />
The shortage of staff has been caused, in part,<br />
by a perceived lackofopportunities for personnel<br />
career advancement in the department. This is<br />
evidenced by the fact that a few LAs sought and<br />
obtained transfers to other departments of the<br />
ministry. There has also been an alarming staff<br />
turnover throughout the years. The staff<br />
shortagesituatior has probably been aggravated<br />
by the adoption of the International Monetary<br />
Fund-sponsored structural adjustment programmes.<br />
Success has been achieved in t he organisation<br />
of farmers into associations of wool and mohair<br />
growers tf-rough education and persuasion.<br />
Nowvr, the marketing associations are riddl2d<br />
with problems that undermine their very<br />
existence. To illustrate the point: there were<br />
10,484 me<strong>mb</strong>ers of WGA in 1985/86 and 4060<br />
mohair grower association me<strong>mb</strong>ers during the<br />
same period (Hunter, 1987). However, data<br />
obtained for the 1990/91 wool season suggest<br />
thattheme<strong>mb</strong>ershipofWGAhaddeclinedtoless<br />
than half (4932) and that of mohair growers had<br />
increased slightly (4854). The cause for this<br />
apparent disintegration of the associations can<br />
arguably be traced back to the shortage of<br />
advisory staff at the grassroots level. When<br />
farmers do not obtain adequate advice then the<br />
chances for disillusionment and break up of the<br />
groups are high. There exists an urgent need to<br />
fill this gap, as it is more cost effective to work<br />
with organised groups than with individuals.<br />
Success has been achieved in convincing some<br />
farmers to improve their flocks through breeding<br />
with improved rams. However, the character of<br />
land tenure in Lesotho has not helped those<br />
farmers solve their management problems,<br />
Progressive farmers have defined a breeding<br />
season and they actually plan for it but there are<br />
many instances ofewes being impregnated in the<br />
communal range. This has greatly slowed, if not<br />
completely impeded, efforts to improve stock,<br />
Disease control problems, especially aheep<br />
scab can also be blamed on the chaacter of the<br />
land tenire system. Those flocks that have been<br />
dipped graze together with undipped flocks,<br />
rendering the dipping ineffective. The problem is<br />
not confined to sheep scab only, it also includes<br />
internal parasites. A few farmers have taken the<br />
advice of dosing their animals regularly for<br />
internal parasites, but this exercise is futile<br />
given that the animals graze on the same range<br />
as undosed flocks. This probably explains why<br />
only 18% of the sheep and goat owners dosed<br />
their animals according to departmental<br />
recommendations in 1984/85 (Hunter, 1987).<br />
Farmers still attached 'alue to nu<strong>mb</strong>ers rather<br />
than quality and, as a result, the recommended<br />
annual culling of unproductive and off-type<br />
217<br />
animals has not been adhered to by the majority<br />
of farmers.<br />
Land degradation in Lesotho ic thought to be<br />
a result of overstocking and overgrazing. The<br />
management of rangelands is a responsibility ( f<br />
chiefs who historically were effective<br />
administrators. Apparently that effectiveness<br />
has now been undermined (Mlotsamai, 1990) and<br />
negligence has crippled the institution. Many<br />
reasons have been cited as contributing L this<br />
lack of effectiveness. One school of thught<br />
points to the problems facing government in<br />
providing the logistical support and manpower<br />
to enforce regulations. Chiefs, however, have<br />
voiced dissatisfaction with the manrei in which<br />
trespassers are punished by the courts. In many<br />
cases such people are not even brought to justice<br />
and if they are, fines may not be meted out<br />
according to the law. This, coupled with the delay<br />
by courts in administering justice, makes<br />
enforcement of regulations difficult.<br />
Suggested framework for future<br />
development prograrimc<br />
The grazing fee regulation, depending on its<br />
enforcement, will go a long way in improving the<br />
rangeland. Government would do -well to<br />
speedily gazette the regulations for their timely<br />
implementation. The re-adjustment phase in the<br />
initial years could be rough but farmers will<br />
eventually become accustomed to it as they have<br />
to other taxes.<br />
Bocause of the inacoessibility of some areas<br />
by road and, therefore, the , npracticability of<br />
putting up new shearing sheds, the informal<br />
traders wool and mohair "hawkers" (Hunter,<br />
1987) must be revewed. It may be necessary to<br />
re-legalise them to reduce or to completely<br />
out-compete smuggling thereby releasing more<br />
wool fr saic through the formal marketing<br />
channels.<br />
Government shcv:!d effectively work itselfout<br />
of the marketing structures. Some farmers are<br />
known to dislike LPMS because they see theni as<br />
an agency designed to make profit for the<br />
Government. The marketing ofwool and mohair<br />
should be handed over to WMGA9, albeit<br />
gradually, and maintenance of shearing sheds<br />
and payment of staff thereof would effectively<br />
ceade to be the responsibility ofgovrnment.<br />
Synthesis of the development case sudies<br />
Since the early days of Basotho nationhood wool<br />
and mohair have been major sources of income<br />
for rural farmers in many regions of Lesotho,<br />
especially in the remote mountain areas.<br />
Hence government has had to erect<br />
structures for the continued growth and<br />
development potential of Lesotho's most<br />
important export product. The programmes by<br />
necessity had to include policy issues on range<br />
management and small stock production,