06.12.2012 Views

aistand south~ern afrkca - (PDF, 101 mb) - USAID

aistand south~ern afrkca - (PDF, 101 mb) - USAID

aistand south~ern afrkca - (PDF, 101 mb) - USAID

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Table 4. Milk production and reproductive<br />

peronnanceofMpwapwa cattle at<br />

Bereg/.<br />

SD 2<br />

Parameter N' Mean<br />

Milk yield (kg) 3<br />

30 1626 .3<br />

Daily milk yisld 30 5.5 1.1<br />

(kg/d)<br />

Lactation length 30 300 17<br />

(days)<br />

Calving Interval 18 498 97<br />

(days)<br />

Age at first 10 33 9.7<br />

calving (months)<br />

1. Nu<strong>mb</strong>er of observations.<br />

2. Standard deviation,<br />

3. Mill yield for the first three lactaticas and<br />

excludes tho ,,',ount suckled by the calf.<br />

The mean lactation yield of the Mpwapwa<br />

cattle at Berege was within the values reported<br />

on-station (Mpiri, 1982; Mkonyi, 1983, Kasonta,<br />

1988). The similarity was expected since the<br />

general cattle management practices were more<br />

or less similar.<br />

The mean age at first calving was 33 months<br />

and is lower than the range of 37-50 months<br />

reported on-station (Katyega, 1981; Getz et al,<br />

1986; Kasonta, 1988). This might probobly be<br />

due to the fact that farmers mated their heifers<br />

at an earlier age compared to thoue on-station<br />

where a strict mating schedule (after attaining<br />

200 kg or at two years) was adhered to. On the<br />

other hand, it can not be completely ruled out<br />

that heifers on-farm attained an optimum<br />

liveweight at first mating (Stobbs, 1967) much<br />

earlier than those reared on-station. This could<br />

be possible due to a faster growth rate resulting<br />

from better feeding and general management of<br />

the relatively smaller herds.<br />

The mean calving interval of498 days, witha<br />

standard deviation of 97 days is within the range<br />

reported earlier (Das et al, 1986; Kasonta, 1988).<br />

The apparently longer calving interval of .he<br />

Mpwapwa cattle at Berege may be associated<br />

with a nu<strong>mb</strong>er of factors, such as inability of the<br />

farmer to detect heat, early e<strong>mb</strong>ryonic mortality<br />

and the failure by the farmers to obtain the<br />

oreeding bull at the correct time (Kasonta et al,<br />

1990). The long calving intervals of the<br />

Mpwapwa cattle on-station may be attributed to<br />

some level of sub-fertility due to moderate undernutrition<br />

and the rigid mating seasons (Kasonta,<br />

1988).<br />

In general, the milk production and<br />

reproductive performance of the Mpwapwa<br />

cattle under farmer management in Berege does<br />

not differ significantly from that et LPRI,<br />

Mpwapwa. However, some other management<br />

aspects deserve mention at this point. The<br />

86<br />

farmers who were keen to establish and manage<br />

the IFGs, were able to get adequate feeds to carry<br />

their animals through the dry season, hence<br />

maintaining milk production and growth of the<br />

animals for a relatively longer time than those<br />

who were not. This fact may explain the observed<br />

variations performance. in milk production and reproductive<br />

Similarly, a good proportion of the cooperating<br />

farmers, especially those with donkey<br />

carts adopted the technology of collection and<br />

conservation of cereal stovers under shed in the<br />

fields near the cattle kraals fRr use during the<br />

critical feed shortage period. However, the<br />

farmers who did not own donkey-carts stacked<br />

the stover loose in the fields near the homesteads.<br />

It has been deduced that those farmers<br />

who had adopted the feed conservation<br />

strategies that were recommended had adequate<br />

feeds for their 'vestock. This enabled their<br />

animals to remain in production and in good<br />

condition for longer periods (Kasonta et al, 1990).<br />

During the diagnostic survey, it was observed<br />

that a local water melon ecotype was intercropped<br />

in cereal fields, and fed to cattle during<br />

the dry season mainly as a source of water. This<br />

was a local initiative and technology in the area,<br />

that attracted the interest of researchers and<br />

hence warranted further study and development.<br />

A quick survey was conducted in Berege<br />

Village in the 1988/89 season as a follow-up to<br />

this. The objective was to gain an insight to the<br />

melon production characteristics within the<br />

existing farming system (Kusekwa et al, 1990).<br />

The results of the survey revealed that the<br />

spacing between the water melon plants within<br />

the intercrop situation ranged from 0.5 to 11.5 m<br />

giving a plant population of between 1000 to<br />

6000 plants/ha. The fruit nu<strong>mb</strong>ers ranged from<br />

3000 to 20,000 per ha with a fresh weight per<br />

fruit of 1 to 27 kg, giving an estimated one<br />

hectare yield of 5 to 10 tons (Kusekwa et al,<br />

1990). The details of the nutritional aspects of<br />

the water melons have recently been<br />

documented (Shayo, 1992).<br />

Implementation priblems and solutions<br />

The most recent report showed that the<br />

Mpwapwa cattle population at Berege had more<br />

than tripled, i.e. the total populatlon was over 70<br />

(Anon, 1991). About 16 head of cattle, momtly<br />

bulls, had been sold either within the vi!age er<br />

at auction markets outside Berege, at prices<br />

ranging from TSh 65,000 (US$ 217) o T.Sh<br />

120,000 (US$ t100) per animal depending on<br />

where they were sold. There are implications to<br />

this. Fprmers realised that they could mauke<br />

substantial profit by selling their surplus<br />

animals at auction markets rather than within<br />

the village and that if an oppropriate breeding<br />

programme was not adopted, inbreeding would<br />

soon become a serious problem hind.ring further<br />

improvemen', in livestock productivity. To

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!