aistand south~ern afrkca - (PDF, 101 mb) - USAID
aistand south~ern afrkca - (PDF, 101 mb) - USAID
aistand south~ern afrkca - (PDF, 101 mb) - USAID
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Development of feeding strategies<br />
and management systems<br />
The climate in the study area is semi-arid and<br />
therefore water shortage is a constraint in the<br />
improvement of livestock production. In the<br />
more humid areas of Kilimanjaro region in<br />
northern Tanzania where zero-grazing has been<br />
practised for a long time, banana pseudo-stenis<br />
are used as the main source of water to the<br />
stall-fed cattle, sheep and goats.<br />
Incidentally, inedible water melons (Citrullus<br />
vulgaris)are widely p'anted by agropastoralists<br />
in the semi-arid areas of central Tanzania with<br />
one hectare producing 5-10 tonnes of water<br />
melon fruits (Kusekwa et al, 1991). The, uad of<br />
water melons as an alternative sourca of water<br />
for cattle has recently been studied (Shayo,<br />
1992). Results showed that the water content in<br />
water melon fruit- was 95% and the proportion<br />
of the dry seeds in the whole fruit w'as about 2%.<br />
Shayo (1992) did not find any significant<br />
differences in the daily water intake (P> 0.05)<br />
between the two groups ofyoung bulls provided<br />
with either drinking water or water melons<br />
(Table 1). There was also no significant<br />
diff,rence (P> 0.05) in daily hay intake between<br />
the two treatments. The animals in both<br />
treatments did not show any sigp-s of disease<br />
throughout the one-month experimental period,<br />
Browse<br />
Feed energy and crude protein availability have<br />
been identified as the most crucial nutrients in<br />
livestock production in the tropics especially in<br />
the dry seasons (Wilson and Minson, 1980; Adu<br />
and Adamu, 1982; Van Soest, 1982). The<br />
nutritive value of the natural pastures and<br />
cereal residues during the dry season is below<br />
optimum for supporting growth and milk production,<br />
therefore supplementation of energy<br />
and protein is necessary. However, villages in the<br />
Project areas are in remote places and transportation<br />
of commercial supplements is dLicult<br />
and costly, furthermore, the villagers do not have<br />
sufficient incorme to purchase supplements. This<br />
raises the need for supplementation using locally<br />
available feed resources. While locally produced<br />
cereal byproducts and pulses are potential feeds<br />
for ruminants, they are fed to non-ruminants<br />
and are therefore not available to ruminants.<br />
Legumes forage and browse are probably the<br />
best alternative supplement for ruminant<br />
livestock fed on low quality roughages in these<br />
circumstances. Apart from being a source of<br />
quality feed, leguminous trees and shrubs have<br />
many more qualities that give them a<br />
multipurpose value in farming systems; for<br />
example they are a good source of firewood and<br />
for fixing soil nitrogen. A survey in the study area<br />
revealed the existence of common natural trees<br />
and shrubs in the closed areas, which may be<br />
used as a source offeed and they include: Albizia<br />
harveyi; .Albizia patensiana;Delonix elata;<br />
Acaric tortilis and other Acacia species,<br />
Dichrostachyus glomerata and Brachystegia<br />
species.<br />
Acacia pods and water melon ieed meal<br />
Acacia tortilistrees are widely distributed in the<br />
target areas. Their importance in livestock<br />
production is in the value of the leaves and pods<br />
as feed for ruminant livestock (Gwynne, 1969;<br />
Coppock et al, 1987; Tanner et al, 1990). The<br />
project made investigations (Shayo, 1992) on<br />
acacia pods and water melon seed in reference<br />
to chemical composition, yield, digestibility,<br />
ammonia-nitrogen (NH2-N) production in the<br />
rumen and effects on mi'k yield and composition<br />
of Mpwapwa cows. Water melon seeds are a<br />
byproduct obtained after feeding the melon<br />
fruits to animals as a source of water. Estimates<br />
on the yield of Acacia tortilis pod revealed a<br />
range from 28 to 206 kg (mean = 93.4 ± 44.2 SD)<br />
per tree per season where vs water melon seed<br />
production ranged from 30 to 180 kg per ha<br />
depending on spacing and rainfall patterns.<br />
Chemical composition of different components of<br />
Acacia tortilisand Acacia albid,:,pods and water<br />
melons as compared to sunflov.r seed cake and<br />
Cenchrusciliariqhay is provided in Tables 2 and<br />
3 and their in vitro digestibility and in sacco<br />
degradability are shown in Tables 4 and 5,<br />
respectively. The data indicates that based on<br />
chemical composition cnd in vitro digestibility,<br />
acacia pods and s,ed, and water melon seeds<br />
Table 1. Daily water and wat, melon intake, and their effect on mature hiy intake by growing bulls.'<br />
Teatment<br />
Free<br />
water<br />
(kg)<br />
Water<br />
melons<br />
(fresh) (kg)<br />
Intake (kglanlmal/day)<br />
Hay<br />
Acacla pods<br />
Water DM Water DM<br />
Water<br />
Watermelons<br />
SE<br />
14.64<br />
-<br />
:t2.73<br />
-<br />
18.36<br />
±k2.79<br />
0.23<br />
-.1<br />
3.41<br />
3.18<br />
+0.21<br />
0.15<br />
0.15<br />
1.35<br />
1.35<br />
1.None of the treatment differences were statistically significant (P< 0.05).<br />
2. Includes water from the hay and from water melons and acacia pods.<br />
3. DM from wate. melon seeds was not included.<br />
205<br />
Total<br />
Water 2 DM 3<br />
15.02 4.76<br />
17.80 5.13<br />
4 2.79 0.20