06.12.2012 Views

aistand south~ern afrkca - (PDF, 101 mb) - USAID

aistand south~ern afrkca - (PDF, 101 mb) - USAID

aistand south~ern afrkca - (PDF, 101 mb) - USAID

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

country relies on the development of both crops<br />

and livestock. In cognizance of this fact the<br />

government set up a nu<strong>mb</strong>er of agricultural<br />

projects in which livestock are a major<br />

component. ISABU, a government institution<br />

with a mandate to conduct agricultural research<br />

in the country, initiated a project in 1960 of<br />

crossing Sahiwal with Ankole. This was followed<br />

by a selection programme of the crosses in 1975<br />

at Rukoko and in 1978 at Mahwa.<br />

After many years of on-station research work<br />

the scientists felt that it was important to<br />

introduce the crosses on-farm. Government<br />

statistics indicate that the total national cattle<br />

herd has declined in the past 10 years partly due<br />

to the shrinkage of grazing areas and the<br />

demand fcr beef. In consideration of the positive<br />

productive livestock the interactions government felt between that an crops integrated and<br />

agricultural approach was the most expedientt<br />

ensure contindty in crop and livestock<br />

development,<br />

In pursuit of this policy, Kisozi was identified<br />

as a suitable site for on-farm research is it was<br />

representative of the high-altitude areas; its<br />

proximity to the Kisozi Research Station was an<br />

added advantage. The target group was the<br />

smallholder farmer who grew crops and raised<br />

livestock. The ISABU scientists put together a<br />

package of technologies that comprised a<br />

Sahiwal and Ankole cross, an improved cow shed<br />

and a feed production programme. However,<br />

before on-farm introduction the scientists made<br />

a survey to characterise and identify potential<br />

cooperating farmers,<br />

The following questions were put to the<br />

farmers:<br />

" Do you have your own land?<br />

" Do you live on your own land?<br />

" Do you derive most of your income from the<br />

land?<br />

" Do you have less than three head of livestock?<br />

" Have you established a plot of cultivated<br />

pastures?<br />

" Do you agree to participate in the ISABU<br />

proposal on livestock improvement and its<br />

emphasis on the integration with crops?<br />

Methodology and time sequence<br />

The farmers who were identified were asked to<br />

fulfil a set of conditions including construction of<br />

a simple cow shed and the establishment ofa plot<br />

of THpsacum laxum. In 1986, six farms<br />

participated in the programme after adhering to<br />

the stipulated conditions. They were given an<br />

in-calf Sahiwal and Ankole crossbred heifer on<br />

credit at a cost equivalent of US$ 65 which had<br />

to be repaid in four instalments. In 1987, fifteen<br />

additional participating farmers joined the<br />

programme and in 1988 and 1989 the nu<strong>mb</strong>er<br />

increased by 12 and by six, respectively,<br />

Burundese farmers have traditionally kept<br />

cattle for milk and manure production, therefore<br />

47<br />

their acceptance of the package was not difficult.<br />

Government also encourages farmers to keep<br />

livestock to improve their standard of living.<br />

However, the cost of a oregnant heifer is<br />

generally prohibitive for peasants, when this is<br />

compared with the per capita income of US$ 250<br />

per year. Furthermore, the scarcity of land does<br />

not favour raising large rumirants.<br />

Implementation of the pr'gramme<br />

The main objective of the project was to<br />

characterise the livest-:k production system and<br />

to identify alternatives that promote livestock<br />

and agricultural production.<br />

Achievements and failures<br />

The research programme emphasised on-farm<br />

introduction of improved cattle and feed<br />

production. production To o assess im the pro programme, game different difeed<br />

indices on the suitability of the technologies onfarm<br />

were set, including liveweight changes of<br />

offspring and milk<br />

Concurrently,<br />

and manure production.<br />

several forage species were introduced<br />

on-farm to improve animal nutrition and<br />

to eventually establish the adoption of a zerograzing<br />

programme. The adaptability of the<br />

introduced forage species and their productivity<br />

was studied and the manure produced on the<br />

farms was used to fertilise arable crops. A<br />

comparative analysis of the impact of manure<br />

on crop production was made. In addition,<br />

traditional milk processing technology was<br />

critically analysed during the later phase of the<br />

programme. The adaptation of the introduced<br />

Sahiwal-Ankole crossbred in the rural area was<br />

assessed by measuring production parameters of<br />

herd multiplication, milk production, fecundity<br />

and mortality rates (Tables 4, 5, 6 and 7) and<br />

manure production (Table 8).<br />

Table 4. Herd growth rate and mortality rates<br />

on-larni and on-station.<br />

Station On-farm<br />

Calving rates (%) 69 77.8<br />

Moraiy rates (%) 1.6 2.6<br />

Growth of the herd 29.3 32.1<br />

per annum ()<br />

All of these indices, with the exception of<br />

mortality, showed better performance on-farm<br />

than on-station.<br />

The use of animal manure to improve soil<br />

fertility has been a long standing practice in<br />

Burundi. Participating farmers were<br />

encouraged to put bedding (in the form of grass)<br />

in the sheds and this was mixed with animal<br />

dung to produce farmyard manure. As the<br />

manure accumulated it was deposited into a<br />

covered pit outside the shed to reduce the level<br />

of leaching. The careful handling of manure<br />

resulted in high levels of recovery (Table 8).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!