aistand south~ern afrkca - (PDF, 101 mb) - USAID
aistand south~ern afrkca - (PDF, 101 mb) - USAID
aistand south~ern afrkca - (PDF, 101 mb) - USAID
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
country relies on the development of both crops<br />
and livestock. In cognizance of this fact the<br />
government set up a nu<strong>mb</strong>er of agricultural<br />
projects in which livestock are a major<br />
component. ISABU, a government institution<br />
with a mandate to conduct agricultural research<br />
in the country, initiated a project in 1960 of<br />
crossing Sahiwal with Ankole. This was followed<br />
by a selection programme of the crosses in 1975<br />
at Rukoko and in 1978 at Mahwa.<br />
After many years of on-station research work<br />
the scientists felt that it was important to<br />
introduce the crosses on-farm. Government<br />
statistics indicate that the total national cattle<br />
herd has declined in the past 10 years partly due<br />
to the shrinkage of grazing areas and the<br />
demand fcr beef. In consideration of the positive<br />
productive livestock the interactions government felt between that an crops integrated and<br />
agricultural approach was the most expedientt<br />
ensure contindty in crop and livestock<br />
development,<br />
In pursuit of this policy, Kisozi was identified<br />
as a suitable site for on-farm research is it was<br />
representative of the high-altitude areas; its<br />
proximity to the Kisozi Research Station was an<br />
added advantage. The target group was the<br />
smallholder farmer who grew crops and raised<br />
livestock. The ISABU scientists put together a<br />
package of technologies that comprised a<br />
Sahiwal and Ankole cross, an improved cow shed<br />
and a feed production programme. However,<br />
before on-farm introduction the scientists made<br />
a survey to characterise and identify potential<br />
cooperating farmers,<br />
The following questions were put to the<br />
farmers:<br />
" Do you have your own land?<br />
" Do you live on your own land?<br />
" Do you derive most of your income from the<br />
land?<br />
" Do you have less than three head of livestock?<br />
" Have you established a plot of cultivated<br />
pastures?<br />
" Do you agree to participate in the ISABU<br />
proposal on livestock improvement and its<br />
emphasis on the integration with crops?<br />
Methodology and time sequence<br />
The farmers who were identified were asked to<br />
fulfil a set of conditions including construction of<br />
a simple cow shed and the establishment ofa plot<br />
of THpsacum laxum. In 1986, six farms<br />
participated in the programme after adhering to<br />
the stipulated conditions. They were given an<br />
in-calf Sahiwal and Ankole crossbred heifer on<br />
credit at a cost equivalent of US$ 65 which had<br />
to be repaid in four instalments. In 1987, fifteen<br />
additional participating farmers joined the<br />
programme and in 1988 and 1989 the nu<strong>mb</strong>er<br />
increased by 12 and by six, respectively,<br />
Burundese farmers have traditionally kept<br />
cattle for milk and manure production, therefore<br />
47<br />
their acceptance of the package was not difficult.<br />
Government also encourages farmers to keep<br />
livestock to improve their standard of living.<br />
However, the cost of a oregnant heifer is<br />
generally prohibitive for peasants, when this is<br />
compared with the per capita income of US$ 250<br />
per year. Furthermore, the scarcity of land does<br />
not favour raising large rumirants.<br />
Implementation of the pr'gramme<br />
The main objective of the project was to<br />
characterise the livest-:k production system and<br />
to identify alternatives that promote livestock<br />
and agricultural production.<br />
Achievements and failures<br />
The research programme emphasised on-farm<br />
introduction of improved cattle and feed<br />
production. production To o assess im the pro programme, game different difeed<br />
indices on the suitability of the technologies onfarm<br />
were set, including liveweight changes of<br />
offspring and milk<br />
Concurrently,<br />
and manure production.<br />
several forage species were introduced<br />
on-farm to improve animal nutrition and<br />
to eventually establish the adoption of a zerograzing<br />
programme. The adaptability of the<br />
introduced forage species and their productivity<br />
was studied and the manure produced on the<br />
farms was used to fertilise arable crops. A<br />
comparative analysis of the impact of manure<br />
on crop production was made. In addition,<br />
traditional milk processing technology was<br />
critically analysed during the later phase of the<br />
programme. The adaptation of the introduced<br />
Sahiwal-Ankole crossbred in the rural area was<br />
assessed by measuring production parameters of<br />
herd multiplication, milk production, fecundity<br />
and mortality rates (Tables 4, 5, 6 and 7) and<br />
manure production (Table 8).<br />
Table 4. Herd growth rate and mortality rates<br />
on-larni and on-station.<br />
Station On-farm<br />
Calving rates (%) 69 77.8<br />
Moraiy rates (%) 1.6 2.6<br />
Growth of the herd 29.3 32.1<br />
per annum ()<br />
All of these indices, with the exception of<br />
mortality, showed better performance on-farm<br />
than on-station.<br />
The use of animal manure to improve soil<br />
fertility has been a long standing practice in<br />
Burundi. Participating farmers were<br />
encouraged to put bedding (in the form of grass)<br />
in the sheds and this was mixed with animal<br />
dung to produce farmyard manure. As the<br />
manure accumulated it was deposited into a<br />
covered pit outside the shed to reduce the level<br />
of leaching. The careful handling of manure<br />
resulted in high levels of recovery (Table 8).