06.12.2012 Views

aistand south~ern afrkca - (PDF, 101 mb) - USAID

aistand south~ern afrkca - (PDF, 101 mb) - USAID

aistand south~ern afrkca - (PDF, 101 mb) - USAID

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

harvest and livestock sales. The study also<br />

included the development of a technological<br />

package which emphasised utilisation of crop<br />

residues and kitchen waste for feeding dairy<br />

cattle. Good management of crops and livestock<br />

coupled with good records were seen as key<br />

elements. This study showed favourable<br />

economic returns (Table 1) (Biwi, 1987).<br />

Table 1. Revenue and expenditure from a twohectareintgratedfarmat<br />

Kizin tanlStation,<br />

Zanzibar.<br />

Revenue Expenditure Profit<br />

Year (TSh) (TSh) (TSh)<br />

1N=8 35,870.55 13,382.50 2=488.05<br />

1983/84 111,780.35 14,006.00 97,774.35<br />

Source: Ow (1987<br />

The high profit margin shown in 1983/84 was<br />

influenced by the extra revenue from the sale of<br />

sugar-cane sticks grown on the farm. In addition,<br />

milk productien was about three times that of<br />

the previous year and prices rose from TSh 4 to<br />

TSh 6 per litre. Sugar-cane tops were used to feed<br />

the dairy cattle. The breakdown of expenditure<br />

and sales are shown in Tables 2 and 3.<br />

On-farm research<br />

On-farm research was conducted to assess the<br />

acceptability of the technological package to<br />

farmers and their adoption ofit. The target group<br />

was farmers owning two to five hectares of land<br />

and practising an integrated crop-livestock<br />

farming system. This study involved 14 smallholder<br />

dairy farmers in Unguja and Pe<strong>mb</strong>a<br />

(Biwi, 1990). There was a good response in terms<br />

of adoption of the technological package.<br />

Farmers were advised to feed their dairy<br />

cattle on elephant grass (Pennisetum purpureum),<br />

Guatemala grass (Tripsacum laxum),<br />

Gliricidia sepium, Leucaena leucocephala and<br />

banana stems, all grown on the farm, and homemade<br />

concentrate (one part coconut cake and<br />

three parts rice bran with molasses). Milk yields<br />

were monitoied; milk yields and fat-corrected<br />

milk yield for Unguja were 1940 kg/cow per<br />

lactation and 2165 kg/cow per lactation,<br />

respectively. These yield8 were similar to those<br />

found in Pe<strong>mb</strong>a. Most of the cattle in Unguja<br />

were Jerseys, while those in Pe<strong>mb</strong>a were of<br />

Sahiwal composite. These levels of production<br />

were satisfactory.<br />

Artificial Insemination (A) was used onfarm.<br />

The nu<strong>mb</strong>er of inseminations per<br />

conception was 2 and 3.4 for Unguja and Pe<strong>mb</strong>a,<br />

respectively. Calving intervals were 13.1 months<br />

and 14.3 months for Unguja and Pe<strong>mb</strong>a, respectively.<br />

The poorer reproductive performance in<br />

Table 2. Revenue and expenditure from a two-hectare crop-livestock integratedfarm at Kizi<strong>mb</strong>ani,<br />

Zanzibar,1982/83.<br />

Year<br />

1982W3<br />

Expandlture<br />

Salary<br />

Tractor services<br />

Fertiliser<br />

Seeds<br />

Insecticides<br />

Cattle feed<br />

Veterlna-ry drugs<br />

Payment of loan<br />

Payment interest on loan<br />

Income<br />

Milk<br />

Bananas<br />

Maize<br />

Cassava<br />

Cow peas<br />

Sugar-cane<br />

Vegetables<br />

US$I , TSh 23 In19828.<br />

Unit<br />

Price/unit<br />

(TSh)<br />

Total cost<br />

(TSh)<br />

1702 hrs 3hr 5106.00<br />

7.3 acres 220/acre 1606.00<br />

1479 kg 0.25/kg 369.75<br />

- 135.00<br />

- 100.00<br />

2331.5 kg 0.50/kg 1165.75<br />

-- 500.00<br />

- 2000.00<br />

- 2400.00<br />

Total 13,382.50<br />

2627.45 kg 4/kg 10,509.80<br />

1205.05 kg 1.50/ko 1808.25<br />

11,450 cobs 1/cob 11,450.00<br />

5150 kg 1/kg 5150.00<br />

35 kg 7/kg 245.00<br />

12,575 canes 0.50/cane 6287.50<br />

- 420.00<br />

Total 35,870.55<br />

174

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!