04.06.2016 Views

Vergara - 1976 - Physiological and morphological adaptability of ri

Vergara - 1976 - Physiological and morphological adaptability of ri

Vergara - 1976 - Physiological and morphological adaptability of ri

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

iyucitocusm<strong>ri</strong>s or THE RICE CROP 135<br />

obtained upward CO, fluxes in the range between l.l <strong>and</strong> 2.1 CO, mgdrn 1.<br />

h-I. When the rate <strong>of</strong> CO1 release from underlying surfaces was relatively‘ large.<br />

the determination <strong>of</strong> CO, fltlX by the aerodynamical method will lead to the<br />

underestimation <strong>of</strong> canopy photosynthesis rates.<br />

Simulation <strong>of</strong>carbon dioxide environment<br />

In order to study CO, environment <strong>and</strong> photosynthesis <strong>of</strong> the <strong>ri</strong>ce crop in relation<br />

to wind velocity, radiation intensity’. air temperature, <strong>and</strong> plant growth, an<br />

equation desc<strong>ri</strong>bing the exchange <strong>of</strong> CO: between vegetation <strong>and</strong> the air was<br />

nume<strong>ri</strong>cally" solved by the Runge-Kutta method on an electronic computer<br />

[Uehijima et al. <strong>1976</strong>). The simulated CO2 environment <strong>of</strong> a <strong>ri</strong>ce crop is reproduced<br />

in Fig. 9C. The simulated pattern <strong>of</strong> diurnal change <strong>of</strong> CO, level in the air<br />

above a model <strong>ri</strong>ce canopy was in good agreement with observation (EIA Fig.<br />

9B <strong>and</strong> C). The CO; concentration at sun<strong>ri</strong>se is between 400 <strong>and</strong> 500 ppm, falls<br />

rapidly until 0700. <strong>and</strong> then declines more slowly <strong>and</strong> reaches a minimum around<br />

solar noon. The concentration then begins <strong>ri</strong>sing with decreasing solar radiation.<br />

Figure lOA denotes the daily net photosynthesis <strong>of</strong> a model <strong>ri</strong>ce canopy (L =<br />

4.0. kd = 0.65, P, = 8.64g C02 ~m 1 - day 1) as influenced by air mixing <strong>and</strong><br />

shortwave radiation. When the wind was light (Dun, = 0.3 crn/sec), the <strong>ri</strong>ce<br />

canopy showed a plateau-type response <strong>of</strong> daily net photosynthesis to radiation.<br />

with low photosynthesis. Under windy conditions. the <strong>ri</strong>ce canopy showed a<br />

higher net photosynthesis with less decrease <strong>of</strong> the increasing rate <strong>of</strong> photosynthesis<br />

with radiation. The photosynthesis in the case ol’ Dim, = 0.3 cm/sec<br />

<strong>and</strong> S, = l8 MJ/m day‘ was about 50 percent", that in the case <strong>of</strong> D,_,,,_, = l0.2<br />

cm/sec <strong>and</strong> S, = l8 Mllm day’. Simulated radiation <strong>and</strong> photosynthesis relationship<br />

agreed well with those measured with a <strong>ri</strong>ce canopy by Tanaka (1972). The<br />

loti-"e<strong>ri</strong>ng <strong>of</strong> the canopy photosynthesis in light wind is mainly due to the considerable<br />

depression <strong>of</strong> the CO; level near the canopy <strong>and</strong> the increase <strong>of</strong> plant<br />

respiration du<strong>ri</strong>ng the pe<strong>ri</strong>od <strong>of</strong> daylight hours.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!