04.06.2016 Views

Vergara - 1976 - Physiological and morphological adaptability of ri

Vergara - 1976 - Physiological and morphological adaptability of ri

Vergara - 1976 - Physiological and morphological adaptability of ri

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

460 (‘Llhi-XTE iwi) Ricr.<br />

by<br />

1 = Iue a“<br />

where 1,, e <strong>and</strong> k st<strong>and</strong> for the light intensity outside the community, base <strong>of</strong><br />

natural loga<strong>ri</strong>thm. <strong>and</strong> light extinction coefficient, respectively.<br />

Then the mean light intensity, l, for the whole leaf layers would be<br />

-_l F _l0 F 3 _lgr 1 ,PF_ [u _<br />

-<br />

1- FL I¢IF_ Fsui- "dF- TL _Ft ~10 _ kit)<br />

v H)<br />

l‘or arranging the context. I <strong>and</strong> 1" can be replaced by S <strong>and</strong> .-l,<br />

so that the following is obtained<br />

respectively",<br />

S‘: (I —e'*A) (1)<br />

The value <strong>of</strong>k for solar radiation was assumed to be 0.35 in <strong>ri</strong>ce st<strong>and</strong>s (Murata<br />

et al. 1966).<br />

Using the 4-year data, 1967-1970, <strong>of</strong> the IBP field expe<strong>ri</strong>ment, the value <strong>of</strong>f‘<br />

at va<strong>ri</strong>ous growth stages was calculated according to equation (l), <strong>and</strong> the correlation<br />

coefficient between this <strong>and</strong> the corresponding NAR value was calculated.<br />

St<strong>ri</strong>kingly high positive correlations. all significant at 0.1 % level. except<br />

for the single ease <strong>of</strong> Sendai. were obtained:<br />

Akita 9344 (49) Sendai 0.069 (28)<br />

lakada -Fukui 0.581 (36) Nagano 0.823 (36)<br />

Konosu 0.804 (36) liukuyama (1.770 (37)<br />

Chikugt) 0.574 (36) Pooled 0.735 (249)<br />

(Figures in parentheses indicate the number <strong>of</strong> samples.)<br />

The very close correlation was also observed. as shown in Fig. 4, when the<br />

data <strong>of</strong> all the seven stations were pooled. However. those points indicated by<br />

x marks (values observed in the 3-week pe<strong>ri</strong>od just after transplanting) seem to<br />

be exceptions to the general tendency.<br />

Thus, if the deviation <strong>of</strong> actual NAR values from the regression line are taken<br />

at a given station. then it will show the influence <strong>of</strong> factors other than g at the<br />

station at the corresponding level <strong>of</strong> §<br />

Influence <strong>of</strong> physiological age <strong>of</strong> plants<br />

An attempt was then made to remove the influence <strong>of</strong> the next factor. It was<br />

reported earlier that the change with growth <strong>of</strong> photosynthetic activity <strong>of</strong> <strong>ri</strong>ce<br />

leaves could be best represented by the percentage total nitrogen or protein<br />

nitrogen content <strong>of</strong> the leaf blades (Murata et al.. 1957). The same relationships<br />

were generally’ observed irrespective <strong>of</strong> cultural conditions or va<strong>ri</strong>ety<br />

(Murata. 1969; 'l'akano <strong>and</strong> Tsunoda. 1971).<br />

Therefore, by using the analytical data, §~i\=' was calculated <strong>and</strong> its correlation<br />

with NAR was examined. As a result. correlation coefficients considerably

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!