04.06.2016 Views

Vergara - 1976 - Physiological and morphological adaptability of ri

Vergara - 1976 - Physiological and morphological adaptability of ri

Vergara - 1976 - Physiological and morphological adaptability of ri

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

306 (tux-tats AND RICE<br />

Fertilizer is not used in deep water areas even as a basal application. Apparently<br />

the annual silt deposit is sufficient to maintain soil fertility‘ at a constant<br />

level. <strong>and</strong>/or the va<strong>ri</strong>eties shoiv no positive response to added fertilizer.<br />

Yield <strong>of</strong> floating <strong>ri</strong>ce is around 0.4 to 1.0 tfha in Af<strong>ri</strong>ca (Oka <strong>and</strong> Chang.<br />

n.d.)'. 1.5 to 2.0 tfha in Thail<strong>and</strong> which is higher or comparable to the national<br />

average for the non-floating <strong>ri</strong>ce area (Mo<strong>ri</strong>shima, 1964; Yantasast et al., 19110);<br />

3.6 t/ha in Southern Manipur, India (Singh, 1962); 0.9 t/ha in Madras, India<br />

(S<strong>ri</strong>nivasan, 1966); around 2.4 t/ha for the heavy yielders in Bangladesh (Ah<br />

<strong>and</strong> Sen, I955; Alim et at. 1962) or 3 t/ha under optimum conditions (Chowdhury<br />

<strong>and</strong> Zaman, 1970). A maximum yield <strong>of</strong> 9.9 t/ha was obtained in India<br />

(Singh. 1962).<br />

In many deep water <strong>ri</strong>ce areas, floating <strong>ri</strong>ce is the only crop grown, so that<br />

prospe<strong>ri</strong>ty depends to a great extent on its success.<br />

FACTORS AFFECTING<br />

THE SURVIVAL OF SUBMIERGED RICE PLANTS<br />

The ability to survive under complete submergenee is different from the<br />

ability to elongate. In floating nee, the ability to sun~‘ive ctsmplete submergence<br />

is necessary where the <strong>ri</strong>se in water level is too rapid for the internodcs to eateh<br />

up by elongation. Similar factors such as light, temperature, <strong>and</strong> carbohydrate<br />

content affect the elongation <strong>and</strong> survival <strong>of</strong> submerged <strong>ri</strong>ce plants. HOWCVCI".<br />

more studies have been done on the latter than on ivater level-internode elongation.<br />

Submergenee inhibits the formation <strong>of</strong> leaf pigments although the plants may<br />

not be suffe<strong>ri</strong>ng from light deficiency (Varga <strong>and</strong> Varga, 1967). Leaves under<br />

water die <strong>and</strong> only those above the water level are alive.<br />

Age <strong>of</strong> the plant<br />

Resistance to submergenee in terms <strong>of</strong> survival increases with the age <strong>of</strong> the<br />

seedlings (Kondo <strong>and</strong> Okamura, 1932; Alim et al., 1962; Palada. 1970;<br />

Chowdhuiy’ <strong>and</strong> Zainan. 1970). Richha<strong>ri</strong>a <strong>and</strong> Parasuram (1963) noted that the<br />

vegetatiitely’ propagated tillers had higher resistance to submergenee. Tillers in<br />

this case are older <strong>and</strong> therefore more resistant. The use <strong>of</strong> older seedlings<br />

(TO-day-old) as in the practice <strong>of</strong> “double transplanting“ also increases the<br />

resistance to submergence.<br />

In terms <strong>of</strong> grain yield. rather than survival. Konclo <strong>and</strong> Okarnura (1932)<br />

studied the effect <strong>of</strong> submergence with ‘varying ages <strong>of</strong> the plant from 25 to 97<br />

day's after sowing. varying temperatures <strong>of</strong> 20° to 40°C <strong>and</strong> different duration <strong>of</strong><br />

submergenee from 2 to lO days. Their findings showed that the harmful effect<br />

<strong>of</strong> submergence on grain yield is least at seedling stage <strong>and</strong> worst at flovre<strong>ri</strong>ng.<br />

When tiowe<strong>ri</strong>ng is over. damage to grain yiield increases as harvest approaches.<br />

The direct cause <strong>of</strong> this decrease in grain yield differed according to each growth<br />

pe<strong>ri</strong>od-either inhibition <strong>of</strong> tille<strong>ri</strong>ng. anthesis, <strong>and</strong> grain development, or germination<br />

<strong>of</strong> grains on the panicle.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!