04.06.2016 Views

Vergara - 1976 - Physiological and morphological adaptability of ri

Vergara - 1976 - Physiological and morphological adaptability of ri

Vergara - 1976 - Physiological and morphological adaptability of ri

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

458 CLIMATE ANT) RICE<br />

Table 2. Partial correlation coefficient: <strong>of</strong> tho relative docrollinq rate <strong>of</strong> loaf are: with<br />

(1) the percentage total nitrogen content <strong>of</strong> loaves. (2) moon temperature, <strong>and</strong> (3) nolar<br />

radiation du<strong>ri</strong>ng tho former half (A) <strong>and</strong> latter half (8)01 grain-filling pe<strong>ri</strong>od, calculated<br />

for 1987-1971 (Miynaku at al.. 1915}.<br />

Number o1<br />

Station '12.34 '13.24 ‘1423 samples<br />

A Akita 0.281 0.102 0.203 10<br />

Sendai 0.496 0.805" 0.393 9<br />

Takada Er Fuiiui 0.132 0.075 —0.098 10<br />

Nagano 0.548 0.009 0.122 10<br />

Konosu 0.263 0.112 0.025 10<br />

Fukuyama --0.001 0.524 0.449 10<br />

Chikugo 0.591 —0.289 0.135 10<br />

Pooled 0.003 — 0 .046 0.178 69<br />

B Akita 0.012 0.837" 0.144 1O<br />

Sendai 0.390 0.223 0.747 9<br />

Takada 8 Fukui —0.545 0.341 0.012 10<br />

Nagano --0.185 - 0.044 0.292 10<br />

Konosu -— — — —-<br />

Fukuvama ~-0.768‘ 0.655 0.546 10<br />

Chikugo 0.563 0.767‘ ——0.672 10<br />

Pooled —0.370"‘ 0.318‘ 0.090 59<br />

wSdgnificant at sifiafiinii i‘? ('51 level.<br />

after heading <strong>and</strong> in the following 3-week pe<strong>ri</strong>od. with the nitrogen content <strong>of</strong><br />

leaf blades (2). mean daily temperature (3). <strong>and</strong> solar radiation (4). using the<br />

IBP field expe<strong>ri</strong>ment data (part <strong>of</strong> which is shown in Fig. 2). LRDR was calculated<br />

according to the following equation:<br />

LRDR = e4-<br />

‘ —4=<br />

Am. —<br />

i.)<br />

where A. <strong>and</strong> A; denote leaf area index at time t, <strong>and</strong> t1, respectively‘. The results<br />

are shown in Table 2.<br />

Du<strong>ri</strong>ng the earlier pe<strong>ri</strong>od no correlation was significant in any items at any<br />

stations, except for a single item at Sendai. where temperature W35 very closely<br />

correlated with LRDR (rm. = (1.885. significant at 1% level). However. du<strong>ri</strong>ng<br />

the later pe<strong>ri</strong>od, nitrogen content was in most cases negatively correlated. reaching<br />

a significant level at liukuyania <strong>and</strong> also in the pooled data (rm, = 0.3?0.<br />

significant at the 1% level). On the other h<strong>and</strong>, temperature was positively<br />

correlated. reaching significant levels at Akita, Chikugra, <strong>and</strong> in the pooled<br />

data (rm, = 0.318. significant at the 5% level). In contrast. solar radiation<br />

showed no consistent tendency".<br />

From these results it has been concluded that in the earlier half <strong>of</strong> the grainfilling<br />

pe<strong>ri</strong>od. leaf area decrease had no close relationship with nitrogen. temperature.<br />

or radiation. except for the case at Sendai where it was significantly<br />

correlated with temperature. ln the latter hall" <strong>of</strong> the pe<strong>ri</strong>tid. nitrogen content<br />

<strong>and</strong> temperature seemed to exert considerable influence on leaf area decrease;<br />

the lower the nitrogen content <strong>and</strong> the higher the temperature the greater the<br />

decrease in leaf area tended to be.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!