04.06.2016 Views

Vergara - 1976 - Physiological and morphological adaptability of ri

Vergara - 1976 - Physiological and morphological adaptability of ri

Vergara - 1976 - Physiological and morphological adaptability of ri

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

TENIPERATLTRE AND CHEMICAL KINETICS OF FLOODED SOILS 263<br />

pot <strong>and</strong> actual field conditions, <strong>and</strong> it is necessary‘ to conduct expe<strong>ri</strong>ments to fill the gaps between<br />

the two conditions.<br />

‘1".~\.\-1.~\NE2 I guess you use Pc-o: on the basis <strong>of</strong> the idea that CO; is poisonous. But I don‘t<br />

think that CO; is harmful to the growth <strong>of</strong> <strong>ri</strong>ce plants.<br />

Ponnomperrlma: Chang <strong>and</strong> Loomis <strong>and</strong> also Vlamis <strong>and</strong> Davis have shown that excess CO;<br />

retards the growth <strong>of</strong> <strong>ri</strong>ce.<br />

‘rZuraNc: Even with the same values <strong>of</strong> PCO_., the amount <strong>of</strong> total carbon dioxide va<strong>ri</strong>es<br />

greatly with pH. Figure 2 gives us a different impression about CO; formed or present in the<br />

soil <strong>and</strong> in the soil solution. I think it is suitable for this lcjnd <strong>of</strong> discussion to use total CO;<br />

in stead <strong>of</strong> Poop. How do you feel about it?<br />

Ponnampenlma: PCO; is a measure <strong>of</strong> H_CO.. As pH increases HLCO, decreases because <strong>of</strong><br />

l-ICU? formation. PCO: is preferable because it is a direct measure <strong>of</strong> l-I_.C(J,-_ which is believed<br />

to be the harmful species.<br />

T. YOSHIDAI Usually the increase in PCO; is accompanied by a decrease in P0, Concerning<br />

the C0_ injury you mentioned in your paper. what is the relation between them’?<br />

Ponmrmpe<strong>ri</strong>rma; In upl<strong>and</strong> soils Poo; <strong>and</strong> P0; may vary reciprocally. In submerged soils<br />

P01 is virtually zero while PCO- may range from 0.1 to 0.7 atm. According to some plant physiologists.<br />

excess CO.- ean injure plants even in the presence <strong>of</strong> c1.<br />

T. YOSHIDAC I guess your values <strong>of</strong> NFL-N in Fig. 5 are thirty high. Did you add some<br />

nitrogen source in your incubation expe<strong>ri</strong>ment’? And did <strong>ri</strong>ce plants st<strong>and</strong> in this expe<strong>ri</strong>ment‘?<br />

If so. was not injury observed‘?<br />

Ponnamperuma: The values are high but not uncommon in lowl<strong>and</strong> tropical <strong>ri</strong>ce soils. No<br />

nitrogen was added <strong>and</strong> there were no <strong>ri</strong>ce plants.<br />

NIX: If the reactions desc<strong>ri</strong>bed are biochemical. then presumably some <strong>of</strong> the differences<br />

between soils from different regions are due to differences in soil microtlora. It would be interesting<br />

to seed ste<strong>ri</strong>lized soil with cultures from different soil sources in order to examine this<br />

question. It could be expected that rnicrotlora from different climatic environments would<br />

have different thermal requirements for maximum activity.<br />

Ponnamperuma: ‘res. some <strong>of</strong> the differences may be due to dittcrenccs in mier<strong>of</strong>lora. But I<br />

would add that some soil properties such as organic matter content. kind <strong>and</strong> content <strong>of</strong> clay‘,<br />

<strong>and</strong> presence <strong>of</strong> enzyme inhibitors or activators. etc.. could also influence the kinetics.<br />

T. YOSHIDAI Dr. Nishiyamas presentation this morning indicated that temperature affects<br />

the root development <strong>and</strong> activity <strong>of</strong> <strong>ri</strong>ce. l|1 your expe<strong>ri</strong>mental results under greenhouse conditions.<br />

the direct temperature effect on <strong>ri</strong>ce roots. other than chemical kinetics in soil. might be<br />

a major factor in the poor <strong>ri</strong>ce growth <strong>and</strong> yield at the temperature below 20°C or at 4ST.<br />

Ponnamperuma: There is no question that temperature affects root metabolism. but it may<br />

not be the major factor.<br />

GHILDYAL: D0 you think that nit<strong>ri</strong>fication inhibitors in ceflain soils are responsible for<br />

reducing nitrogen losses?<br />

Pomwmperuma: Yes. in test tubes <strong>and</strong> pots, not in the field.<br />

T. ‘rostrum: You discused va<strong>ri</strong>ous chemical factors to account for the det<strong>ri</strong>mental effect on<br />

<strong>ri</strong>ce growth at certain temperature regimes. Do you have any figures on the quantities <strong>of</strong> these<br />

chemicals in soil that were det<strong>ri</strong>mental to <strong>ri</strong>ce growth under your expe<strong>ri</strong>mental conditions such<br />

as the <strong>ri</strong>ce va<strong>ri</strong>ety that you used?<br />

Pormamperztma: I agree. But plants grew in ltilaahas clay" both at 15"‘ <strong>and</strong> 45°C. while on<br />

other soils they died. So there is a temperature-induced soil effect in addition to the direct<br />

effect <strong>of</strong> temperature on the roots. Yes. there are va<strong>ri</strong>etal differences in tolerance to inju<strong>ri</strong>ous<br />

soil conditions. The levels that physiologists have given for toxicities <strong>of</strong> CO, organic acids, or<br />

iron serve only as a guide.<br />

PHUNG: If I saw your first slide correctly, the Eh's were markedly different among temperature<br />

treatments.<br />

Ponnamperuma: No. only at 38°C was the Eh markedly different from those at 15'“. 20"‘. <strong>and</strong><br />

30°C. This may be due to the higher rate <strong>of</strong> O_ consumption at 38° than at the other temperature<br />

du<strong>ri</strong>ng the hour or tvro that elapsed between submergence <strong>and</strong> Eh measurement.<br />

PHUNG: In Fig. 4. is NO,-'\' (ppm) expressed on a soil basis or as nitrate-N in the soil solulion‘?<br />

Pormampe<strong>ri</strong>rma: NO; is ppm N in the soil solution.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!