04.06.2016 Views

Vergara - 1976 - Physiological and morphological adaptability of ri

Vergara - 1976 - Physiological and morphological adaptability of ri

Vergara - 1976 - Physiological and morphological adaptability of ri

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

234 CLIMATE AND RICE<br />

Rule <strong>of</strong> carbon ossmitntion (QCOZ-rrfzhetd/hr)<br />

7<br />

6_<br />

O | | | | | | | 1 I | I<br />

O OI 0.2 O3 0.4 O5 O6 OT O8 O9 IO Ii t2<br />

l-iql" hlfitiity (cul- cm'2 - min")<br />

4. Relationship between light intensity <strong>and</strong> photosyntlhetic<br />

rates in <strong>ri</strong>ce populations with ho<strong>ri</strong>zontal leaves<br />

t‘ ‘l <strong>and</strong> vertical leaves (O<br />

O) (Tanak1l972)<br />

The relationships between leaf angle <strong>and</strong> photosynthesis in a <strong>ri</strong>ce population<br />

with LA] <strong>of</strong> 7.1 were observed by T. Tanaka (I972). The light density fell<br />

gradually as light penetrated into the population with vertical leaves, but<br />

rapidly as it entered the population with ho<strong>ri</strong>zontal leaves. For example, at<br />

heading time. 90 <strong>of</strong> the daylight was intercepted in the vertical distance <strong>of</strong> 30<br />

cm in the <strong>ri</strong>ce population with ho<strong>ri</strong>zontal leaves. while the percentage intercepted<br />

in the same vertical distance in the <strong>ri</strong>ce population with vertical leaves<br />

was 50% <strong>of</strong> the daylight. Figure 4 shows that the photosynthesis in the population<br />

with vertical leaves increased with light intensity <strong>and</strong> did not reach saturation.<br />

while in the population with ho<strong>ri</strong>zontal leaves, it increased with light<br />

intensity up to about 0.6 cal -cm'* - min-k <strong>and</strong> above this became light-saturated.<br />

In this expe<strong>ri</strong>ment. the grain yield in the <strong>ri</strong>ce population with ho<strong>ri</strong>zontal leaves<br />

was 33% less than that in the <strong>ri</strong>ce population with vertical leaves. Thus, it<br />

seems that a <strong>ri</strong>ce population with vertical leaves is one <strong>of</strong> the most important<br />

characte<strong>ri</strong>stics for increasing grain yield.<br />

The leaves in a plant population receive light on both obverse <strong>and</strong> reverse<br />

<strong>ri</strong>des. Under diffused solar radiation, the obverse <strong>and</strong> reverse sides <strong>of</strong> leaves<br />

receive light equally. This is true in the population with vertical leaves rather<br />

than in the population with ho<strong>ri</strong>zontal leaves. On the other h<strong>and</strong>, under direct<br />

solar radiation. the leaves in a population receive light strongly on one <strong>of</strong> two<br />

sides. The leaves in the lower layer <strong>of</strong> a population receive more abundant<br />

light under diffused radiation than under direct radiation (Ito, 1971). The<br />

photosynthesis in plant populations such as <strong>ri</strong>ce, soyfbeail, <strong>and</strong> sugar beet<br />

increased with increasing percentage <strong>of</strong> diffused light to total solar radiation<br />

(Kumura. 1968; Ito, 197111‘. Tanaka, 1W2).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!