04.06.2016 Views

Vergara - 1976 - Physiological and morphological adaptability of ri

Vergara - 1976 - Physiological and morphological adaptability of ri

Vergara - 1976 - Physiological and morphological adaptability of ri

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

cntnyrn AND NUTRIENT LIPTAKE or RICE Roors 267<br />

Fujifs ( 1961) work broadened the scope <strong>of</strong> root studies <strong>of</strong> lowl<strong>and</strong> <strong>ri</strong>ce. It<br />

presented a comprehensive theory on the emergence <strong>and</strong> elongation <strong>of</strong> roots<br />

that has hitherto been regarded as extremely complicated. At the same time, he<br />

established a <strong>morphological</strong> basis for the interpretation <strong>of</strong> tl1e interrelation <strong>and</strong><br />

interdependence between ae<strong>ri</strong>al <strong>and</strong> underground organs.<br />

From a similar point <strong>of</strong> vie w, Inosaka (1962) who investigated the branching,<br />

connection, <strong>and</strong> development <strong>of</strong> vascular bundles in lowl<strong>and</strong> <strong>ri</strong>ce, stressed the<br />

importance <strong>of</strong> nodes in the formation <strong>of</strong> roots <strong>and</strong> ae<strong>ri</strong>al organs.<br />

Kawata et al. (I963), following the work <strong>of</strong> Fujii (1961) <strong>and</strong> lnosaka (1962).<br />

car<strong>ri</strong>ed out a detailed survey on the formation <strong>of</strong> root systems <strong>of</strong> lowl<strong>and</strong> <strong>ri</strong>ce<br />

grown in a paddy field. They added new discove<strong>ri</strong>es to the theory <strong>of</strong>Fujii (1961)<br />

<strong>and</strong> constructed a unique theory They claimed that Fujifs theory was defective<br />

in that it combined the two rows <strong>of</strong> roots that emerged above <strong>and</strong> below a node<br />

<strong>and</strong> regarded them as nodal roots <strong>of</strong> the said node. Kaivata et al. (1963) thought<br />

it more reasonable to assume a"shor1 unit," a concept similar to the “leafintemode<br />

unit" presented by Shannan (1941) in corn, as the fundamental growth<br />

unit <strong>of</strong> <strong>ri</strong>ce (Fig. 2). because comparatively thin roots emerging below a node<br />

elongate simultaneously with the thick roots that emerge in the upper region <strong>of</strong><br />

the adjacent lower node. Upper <strong>and</strong> lower roots <strong>of</strong> a shoot unit, however, show<br />

some differences in <strong>morphological</strong> features; the upper roots. usually thinner than<br />

the lower ones, tend to extend ho<strong>ri</strong>zontally or obliquely‘ upwards. dist<strong>ri</strong>buting<br />

densely in the upper <strong>and</strong> middle lafrer <strong>of</strong> furrow soil. As a result. a superficial<br />

root mat develops at the surface <strong>of</strong> paddy soil. which plays an important role in<br />

upper<br />

roots<br />

Sh»! llit<br />

Kuuutu e1 alt 9N)<br />

fillt<br />

m" '99" Cmh-structrn unit<br />

lshinlfl 8 Ttlflllill I963]<br />

2. Diagrammatic representation <strong>of</strong> unit concept.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!